1st McCain/Obama Debate.

I was worried all day. I thought for sure McCain was gonna get decimated by Obama's renowned brilliance. About half way through the debate I realized that I had subconsciously bought the media narrative: that Obama is The One. And wow, he's just. Not.

What a relief!

Let's break down the issues:

1. The Economy:
    A fundamental difference, here. Obama blames the economy on "lax regulation" while McCain faults the lack of personal responsibility and greed. These are two completely different worldviews: one favors ever-more government intervention, the other believes in the soundness of individual freedom. {by the way, I think the bail-out is just ri-dic-ulous}

2. On Spending:
     It seems obvious that in order to deflate gov't waste, we have to cut gov't spending. I think McCain did a great job hammering in Obama's $800 billion in new spending proposals. I loved the idea of a simpler tax code, 2 tax brackets and generous dividends for dependents! Yesssss! Favorite line: (regarding Obama's liberal voting record) "It's hard to reach across the aisle from that far to the left." LOL.

3. Energy Independence:
    Obama wants to be independent from foreign oil in 10 years. And while I agree that this is a huge, pressing issue, this won't happen in 10 years. McCain's proposal: nuclear power facilities by 2030 and off-shore drilling is much more plausible. I think this issue demonstrates Obama's idealism vs. McCain's pragmatism. This is where experience matters.

4. Iran:
    I think McCain hit it out the park with his joke about sitting down with Achma-blah-blah. "So we sit down and Iran says we're gonna to wipe Israel off the map and we say: No you're not? Oh please." I laughed out loud at this, because it honestly just sounds ridiculous. You don't sit down for a chat with bullies. Terrorist/rogue gov'ts understand two things: money & might. I agree with McCain that this could dangerous naivete on Obama's part. However, I do think we have to do more than just remain silent in the face of Iran. I was glad to hear McCain agree that low-level talks are important.

5. Russia:
    Obama tried to mock Bush using the "looked into Putin's eyes" line. McCain brilliantly deflected this by saying he'd looked into Putin's eyes, too, and had seen three letters: KGB. Russia is no laughing matter, but I can totally see this being on SNL or the Jon Stewart show: "I looked into Putin's eyes and I saw….a big bowl of BORSCHT!" LOL! I did notice that Obama's idea of "foresight and anticipation" sounded uncannily like the much maligned 'Bush Doctrine' of pre-emption. Anyone else catch that?

6. Iraq:
    McCain made an excellent point: the problem the next President faces will not be whether or not we should have invaded Iraq. The question will be how to win, when to leave and what we will leave behind. Obama would like to frame the discussion around whether or not we should have invaded–and that's just not the issue anymore. McCain did a great job pointing out the the surge is working; a surge that Obama voted against.

Summary:
   
    McCain was the war-scarred, grizzled, old Lion speaking with depth,
wisdom and experience while "The One we've been waiting for" turned out to be a media darling…pipsqueak. The old Lion proved himself a capable, strong leader who has proven himself on the battlefield and in the Senate.

Even the pipsqueak admitted time and again that "John McCain is right" and "John McCain is absolutely right."

On that point, Obama and I are in complete agreement.

[What issues matter to you? What was your interpretation of the debate? Could McCain/Obama have done better in certain areas? Please share! Comment policy enforced.]

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://carefulwisher.blogspot.com Melissa

    Perfectly said! Bravo! Melissa

  • http://restoringtheyears.blogspot.com Grafted Branch@Restoring the Years

    I was most struck by Obama’s arrogant declaration that as President, he will meet with anyone he chooses, anywhere, at anytime…if he thinks it will keep America safe. It felt like he is looking for a kingship, but the presidency is best received as a servant role.

    I don’t pretend to know everything about McCain, but in addition to policy, I’m voting for principle and character–and it’s hard to beat the P.O.W. code moment he had in Vietnam.

  • http://www.butterville.blogspot.com Sara

    All I kept thinking was how many times Obama said “John is right…” He said it a lot. Wake up people even the media Darling admits it! LOL
    As I reached the finish you summoned it up perfectly. John McCain is absolutly right.

  • http://www.elizabethesther.typepad.com Elizabeth Esther

    GB: yes, Obama did sort of bristle at being told how to run his Presidency—and it did strike me as presumptive. This was countered by McCain saying he wouldn’t presume to say how he would do such-and-such b/c he didn’t even have a Presidential seal, yet!

    One other thing I forgot to mention was that I thought McCain did a great job portraying himself as his own person, an independent thinker; and NOT the Bush clone that the libs make him out to be.

  • Pat

    Pretty much disagree with everything you said. No surprise, right? ;-D Why didn’t McCain ever look at Obama? I thought that was extremely weird. Bottom line: Repubs thought McCain won; Dems thought Obama won; pundits mostly gave it to Obama. Obviously, not a game-changer.
    Looking forward to the Biden/Palin debate!

  • http://www.UsborneConnection.com Tressa

    Did anyone else see the blurbs on the news about body language and the extensive (ad-nauseam) interpretation of McCain and Obama? The consensus was that Obama faired well with the body language and McCain did not. It was thought that McCain should have looked at Obama, when Obama turned directly to him. Yeah, maybe he should have. I undertand that there is a lot of research and study behind this. That being said, I go with McCain and his wisdom and experience and his record.

    The Economy – There’s a great YouTube video posted on http://www.mommylife.net talking about the legislation pushed through that caused the housing mess that caused the bank mess…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5tZc8oH–o&eurl=http://mommylife.net/

    GB – I agree that the presidency is best received as a servant role.

    Russia-Obama-Bush Doctrine
    I noticed that, too. Hmm, I wonder if Obama’s advisors called
    him on that?

    As for what issues matter most to me… I know that this last debate focused on Foreign Policy. All extremely important. What it boils down to for me is the sanctity of life and where my president stands on that issue. Where my president stands on that issue says a lot as to how other issues of importance are handled.

  • http://www.butterville.blogspot.com Sara

    Loved the video Tressa linked.

  • Liesl Marie

    Your summary was great. While each side will thinks their guy won, I’ve also heard that the media and far left are concerned because Obama was supposed to just decimate McCain in the debate and he didn’t do that even in their eyes. Yeah for McCain for holding his own. McCain had more substance to his comments and Obama didn’t really address the questions – i.e. when asked what specifically he cut in his budget because of the bail-out. I was talking with some friends and we all notice how Obama kept calling McCain – “John”. But McCain showed respect and said “Senator Obama.” I whole different level of class!

  • Manda

    http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin426.htm – “McCain Madness”

    It’s a little dated (from back in February) but certainly brings up some important things to think about when it comes to McCain. As for Obama, well I think you alrealy know enough about him :o )

    As for me, I’m voting Chuck Baldwin http://www.baldwin08.com

  • Lori

    Obama also called McCain by the wrong name a couple of times and seemed to have trouble remembering the name of the soldier whose bracelet he was wearing. If McCain had done that, it would be used as proof of his old age. And Obama seemed very naive. It’s great to have ideals and hopes, but the president has to deal with other world leaders as they are, not as he’d like them be.
    Some critics say that McCain talked about things he’s done in the past while Obama talked about things he’ll do in the future. Maybe that’s because he hasn’t done much in the past to talk about!
    I’m already praying for Palin and the debate–and I’m a Canadian!

  • http://www.destrysuffridge.blogspot.com destry

    We noticed that Obama kept calling McCain “John”…it was obvious that it was a deliberate attempt to diminish McCains experience and seniority…to me, it just seemed rude and disrespectful.

    The pressure, the “burden of proof” if you will, of this particular debate was on Obama.

    McCain’s record and history in foreign policy speaks for itself. Obama is the one that needed to shine in this debate in order to boost confidence in his abilities in this area…and while he wasn’t decimated…he certainly did not shine.

    McCain needed to come across as “likable” and a little more “in touch”…the jokes that he made…first regarding the presidential seal and then talking with Achma-blah-blah…did just that.

    On to the next debate…

  • http://www.minthegap.com MInTheGap

    I actually believe Sen. Obama did a fairly good job early on when it came to talking about Sen. McCain’s spending. Not having plans in front of me, the person with the more figures tends to come across as more impressive.

    Sen. Obama seemed to needle Sen. McCain, but he couldn’t come up with a spending plan he didn’t like.

    I felt Sen. Obama had the edge coming out of the debate because of the expectation mismatch. Not that I agreed with him, just my gut-level impression.

  • Emily

    I just found your blog linked from another blog that I love. :) Admittedly, I struggled reading your comments and perspective of the debates and particularly your comments on specific topics (the war and Iran especially). Here’s why: much of your thoughts and reasoning are backed not by fact and history, but by the propaganda our media has fed the masses. Case in point: the war. The history of our involvement in Iraq goes so far beyond the 2003 “invasion” (we haven’t left Iraq since 1990) that discussions seem moot if they lack basic information crucial to understanding the big picture. We as Christians MUST get informed! Some background: my husband attended the Bush inauguration in 2000, we are Christian conservatives who hold a very conservative worldview, my hubby is a newspaper editor and author, etc. And he’s written a book on this war, spending tens of thousands of hours researching FACT (not US media info). SO, all that to say that I am deeply disheartened when fellow believers regurgitate media lies vs. discussing truth. May I send a link?

    http://www.thetruthaboutterror.org/blog/truth-christians/muted-masses-truth-and-americas-angst/