The Faulty Pedestal of American Evangelicalism.

[The following is my reaction to the recent HBO documentary "The Trials of Ted Haggard." Feel free to disagree with my conclusions about the problems inherent to modern evangelicalism. I actually hope I'm wrong about this.]

It’s so easy to mock guys like Ted Haggard; men who preach against homosexuality while soliciting s*x from male pr*st*tutes. There’s a devilish delight inherent to these dramatic falls from grace. It provides vicarious revenge for the spectators feasting on the juicy details.  If we’re honest, we like to see the sanctimonious saint reduced to humiliated sinner. Somehow, it validates our own human weaknesses, our own everyday, mundane failures. But the plight of Ted Haggard ought to rip the veil off the shoddy machinations of American evangelicalism.

Pastor-centric churches are the bulwarks of the evangelical movement. Every mega-church needs its superstar pastor. The more charismatic the personality, the better it is for business. And like Haggard admitted in the recent HBO documentary, The Trials of Ted Haggard, he was “bad for business.” Not only was he banned from ever preaching again, he was banished from the state of Colorado. Essentially, New Life Church ran their pastor out of town. Or to put it in Biblical terms: exiled him outside the camp. But why go to such extreme measures? It was almost as if the church feared Haggard, like he might infect them with some malignant form of disaster.

Of course, this is only possible when a church is organized like a business. If the CEO/head-pastor is fraudulent, the result is a church version of a bank on the brink of financial collapse. Once Haggard’s story was exposed, church board members scrambled to shore up the crumbling infrastructure. They were trying to prevent a run on the bank, so to speak.  Haggard had become a massive financial liability. He had to be publicly destroyed.

So, who’s to blame? It’s myopic to place the whole blame on Haggard. His hypocrisy is a symptom of a bigger problem in the evangelical world. Non-denominational and mega-churches are entirely dependent on one personality. Who, for example, will fill Joel Osteen’s shoes once he retires or if (God forbid) he’s caught cheating on his wife? Can evangelicalism survive the picking off of their tragically flawed leaders? Probably. After all, it’s a time-honored tradition for Protestant churches to spin off and establish “new” churches. That’s been going on since Martin Luther nailed his Ninety-Five Theses to the Castle Church door in Wittenberg. Protestants don’t generally stick around long enough to solve the problem. They just up and start over.

This is how the American evangelical church has become much like American consumer culture. With the dizzying array of “seeker friendly” churches springing up everywhere, why shouldn’t we find a church that makes us feel good about ourselves? On any given Sunday, you can shop from a wide selection of church services—each custom-tailored to a targeted demographic.

Here in Southern California, for example, Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church has 17 services in five different venues, all on the same campus. The preaching is all Warren, but the worship style varies from hymns in one venue to, according to the church website, “a musical concert setting!” in another. When it comes to evangelicalism, the church universal has become the church personal preferential. And all these churches have one thing in common: the superstar pastor front and center.

But when you’re standing on the faulty pedestal of American evangelicalism, there’s nothing to break your fall. And as Ted Haggard discovered, no one to pick you up afterward.

This entry was posted in RecoveringEvangelicalsAnonymous. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Needs Jesus

    i mostly agree with your take on this. it’s really sad to me–things like this happen all the time. my hope is that our churches would taste and see Jesus more instead of looking to our preacher/pastor/priest to be our Jesus.

    being in a church that lost its pastor recently–partly due to unrepentant, blatant sin, i’ve seen how a pastor’s sin can actually “infect” and destroy.We didn’t publicly humiliate him, though, and those who were closest to him have not left him. It’s hard to navigate, but there has to be room for love and grace, while at the same time calling for one in sin to repent and believe.

  • Whitney

    I think strict accountability is needed for any church, especially for its leaders. I know of too many pastors (including my e. free church growing up) who stumbled sexually and had to leave. I think that church handled it poorly and never made it more than “oh, he had to leave.” There was never any care for the congregation who was then left reeling.

    A church has to be centered on the gospel and how it affects God’s people, not just “seeker friendly.” The gospel will be a stumbling block to some, but that should never shame us. Christ himself was shameful to non-believers, but look at how powerful his work was! If there’s anything other than solid, biblical, systematic teaching, something is going to fail. Evangelicalism has nothing to do with the gospel and it being preached. The latter should be the goal of the church.
    Thanks for your thoughts on this – it’s good reading!

  • http://www.conversiondiary.com Jennifer (Conversion Diary)

    Wow, powerful post!

    This was one of the reasons that Eucharist-centered worship always made sense to me (not the biggest reason, of course!) I have to kind of laugh when, at our church, the ushers make sure that everything is silent and utterly reverent during the reading of Scripture and the consecration of the Eucharist…but when our priest starts his sermon they let the latecomers in, everyone gets up and goes to the bathroom and moves around, etc…it must be very humbling for him that it’s so obvious that people really aren’t there to see him. :)

    Thanks for a thought-provoking post!

  • http://flourishingmother.blogspot.com Andrea

    Elizabeth,
    thought this was a great article.
    I watched Haggard on Oprah. Oprah bugged the living crap out of me, but I thought Haggard did a really amazing job explaining the story, his situation, and how he dealt with it-personally and publically. It doesn’t sound like his church did anything like what he did to get through this crisis.

    You have to be wary of the mega churches b/c they are in essence–big business/consumerism–as you said. i am not against mega churches–i think you can find the same attitude in smaller churches as well.

  • http://andi-horton.livejournal.com Andrea

    Powerful post, Elizabeth!

    Like Whitney, I am all for holding Christian leaders/teachers (not just pastors) strictly accountable for their actions and teachings, but at the same time I think we could surely do better by those who do, in all their fallen humanity, stumble, than the brutal “don’t let the door hitcha on your way out” dismissal that seems to be handed to those who falter.

    I don’t know if there is a Biblical precedent for this or not (probably not, this is likely just human li’l ol’ me talking, here) but I find myself much readier to extend grace to those who find they have stumbled, given in to temptation, than I do to those who are discovered to have been knowingly, deliberately using their position of authority to willfully deceive and/or exploit the people in their charge. It seems like those are two different situations and call for two different types of response– but like I said, that is probably just my take on it, and I am really not sure that there is actual Scriptural precedent for that.

  • http://terrysoapbox.blogspot.com terry, ornament of His Grace

    Here’s my take. We belong to a large (2,000?) non-denominational church. And I agree with you that the potential for the pastor to be put on a pedestal exists. But it’s due to a congregation of believers that has bought into the pop culture, celebrity cult mindest and infected the church.

    It is also due to laziness, and status obsession. Much like we cheer afar from the stands as we watch our favorite sports teams play, many Christians go to church week after week to “watch” their favorite preacher perform rather than to worship.

    In recent years, our senior pastor has been delegating preaching to assistant pastors. There is a marked decline in the number of parishoners present when it is known that he is not going to speak. Recently he admonished the congregation that we can pray to God and get answers as well as he can, that he is no closer to God than we are. That his role is not about greater authority, but rather greater responsibility. That we are all equally loved in God’s sight. This in response to people bombarding him with “Pastor, pray FOR me”, rather than “Pastor, pray with me.” What a breath of fresh air in a large church!

    All that to say that it is possible for sound theology to rest in a large church and it is equally possible for false teaching to rule and reign in a small one.

  • Sarah

    I go to a non-denominational church that doesn’t have a pastor so that the focus will NOT be on one man. We have elders and deacons, but they serve the church and do not lord over the church. During worship any man can call out a hymn, read scripture, pray, etc. Our roots are affiliated with the Plymouth Brethren.

  • http://www.gladdentheheart.blogspot.com Charlotte

    I think this is one reason I’m drawn to more liturgical worship, as well. When our church of 300 was started 10 years ago, we were intentional in avoiding the megachurch mentality/way of doing things. We are more liturgical than most churches in our denomination & we have the Holy Feast every week (instead of once a month like some churches in our denomination). At times I wish we could do our liturgy and after the Scripture reading sit in silence for 20 minutes in lieu of a sermon. I think it would be amazing.

    Many times I want to head out to Mass at a local Catholic church, but I can’t get past the theological differences–and I think they wouldn’t let me take the Eucharist. I will probably go one day & just sit in the back and soak it all in.

    Thinking about all of this makes me long for heaven… yet again.

    oh-and–have y’all seen this guy? http://www.internetmonk.com He writes about all of this on his blog. I think I’m a “post-evangelical” like him. On his website, click on “post-evangelicalism” under “categories.” It’s pretty interesting stuff.

  • http://debsueknit.blogspot.com Debbie

    Elizabeth what a great post and well worth reading again. I think that Terry, in comment #6 hit it right on the head. A pastor of a mega-church can only rise as far as those who attend his church participate in his ascension to a pedestal. I attend a church where the attendee on a Sunday will number around 3000. But our pastor is one who would say, and has said, “keep me humble and remind me that I am a man just like you.”

    “Seeker Friendly” churches are often just that, friendly to seekers but unable to nourish those who are ready to move beyond milk into the meat of the word of God.

  • Lori

    “There’s a devilish delight inherent to these dramatic falls from grace.” Do you mean in Christian brothers and sisters? I can’t imagine that. It makes me feel sick and terribly sad, personally. And as far as his church’s response, there seems to be another side to the story, so we shouldn’t be too quick to judge.

  • http://www.belikethesun.blogspot.com Margie

    I’ve been thinking about this, and I think church structure – either pastor-focused, like the evangelical churches – or liturgical makes no difference. It all boils down to sin. The solidly liturgical Episcopal church is ripping itself apart because of the arrogance and reach for power of its leaders (the diocese here has voted to leave the national church, and the lawsuits and ugliness is appalling). And the Catholic church has had its share of leaders abusing power and hurting the sheep they’re to lead. My point is that unless church leaders are willing to show humility and cede their own leadership to Christ, then power will be abused or misused and church members will be led astray. It goes without saying that we Christians need to know the Biblical standards of leadership, and critically evaluate whether or not Biblical truths are being taught and lived by church leaders.

    I loved this post because it got me thinking. Which is why I love your blog so much.

  • http://www.heidijowhatdoyouknow.blogspot.com Heidi Jo

    every church has had or will have scandal. men and women in leadership will fail and people will be hurt.

    i think one of elizabeth’s points that makes so much sense though is, will that in turn destroy the teachings too? will the pedestal of teaching topple over with the fallen leadership, or does the church have something more like a three legged stool, on which to fall back on? something more than that one man or woman’s leadership?

  • http://www.elizabethesther.com Elizabeth Esther

    I am loving the discussion, here.

    Two thoughts:

    1. I am not excusing Haggard’s failures. Every person falls, every person fails. My point (which Heidi Jo touched on) was that the strength of a church ought not be dependent on one personality. It grieves me that a man should be placed under such a heavy burden. And no, I do NOT enjoy seeing pastors fall. I was referring to certain media outlets which gobble this stuff up like candy.

    2. I, personally, have been leaning toward liturgical based worship for awhile. However, I am open to however the Spirit moves our family. In other words, I am not an island. I have a husband and children. My spiritual journey is not all about me. I am content to attend our Presbyterian church but I also enjoy attending Mass. I can find common ground with many different kinds of Christians.

    I guess what I’m saying is: my heart is open. I hope to keep it that way.

  • http://www.minthegap.com MInTheGap

    I think you’re close to the root problem. The root problem is that Christ is not the center of the church– something else is. Modern Evangelicalism has replaced the concept of the Biblical church with a social club, and in some cases a superstar pastor.

    However, this isn’t new and isn’t just something American– even back in the time of the New Testament Paul had to deal with squabbling over this type of thing. Remember the whole discussion of who to follow?

    “I’m a follower of Paul!” “I’m a follower of Apollos!” “I’m a follower of Jesus!”

    So, it seems from the very start, we’ve been a people that has tried to replace following Christ with following a person. And these pastors have allowed themselves to get into positions that encourage it.

    And I also believe it to be wrong to run a Pastor out on a rail. The church is a place for people that are growing more like Christ. God may call a pastor out, but it doesn’t mean that a pastor or any member for that manner should not be forgiven and accepted in the body (albeit not in a pastoral role).

    I guess, in a round about way, what I’m trying to say is the problem has a far deeper root– it’s rooted in a false Christianity dependent on something other than Christ. Fix that and you may call yourself what you may– you’ll be pleasing to God.

  • http://fromtheheartofjoanna.blogspot.com joanna

    I guess that I have a different perspective on this topic – we’ve called three different fairly big (1000-2000) churches home over the last few years – as we’ve moved around the country. All were growing pretty quickly. We’ve visited dozens of churches from a lot of backgrounds over that time – all sizes. Our current church rotates through three main pastors on Sundays, and the “senior” pastor is actually the most dry preacher of them all. So there is more than just the pastor going on.

    Yes, getting hung up on one superstar is not great. I can’t speak to liturgical churches, but small churches can tend to feed narrow perspectives and become ingrown and exclusive without even realizing it.

    I find that big churches aren’t just all about being seeker-friendly, or there to make me feel good about myself. I don’t find that there is less of Christ in the big churches – instead, there is less focusing on details to splinter over and judge over – because there is too much variety! I’ve seen more emphasis on the basic – Jesus has changed our lives – and from there, we’re a motley group, let’s see Him flow through us to the world. Big churches can accomplish big things. Big churches learn to deal with big differences – because they’ve got them right at home.

    Some people excel at a small college, others can thrive best at a big state university – maybe churches are the same?

    I don’t see a crystal clear biblical precedent in favor of big (Acts) or small (epistles?) – so don’t give up on the big churches just yet!

    Incidentally, we visited Saddleback over Christmas break but someone else was preaching (not Warren) – it was still powerful.

    Hi Liz!

  • http://www.simplyeclectic.blgospot.com Suezi Gurzi

    I agree with you but will put this in as well. I am a 15 year member of Saddleback Church. Been in ministry there for a number of years. Not just one ministry. Although we are a “seeker friendly” church I seem to get fed and get a nugget of biblical importance every time i attend a weekend service.
    As far as Pastor Rick being a superstar at church…he is but if you go to smaller churches so are those pastors. I feel that anytime there is someone up front teaching they tend to be put on a pedestal. Saw that happen numerous times in bible studies.
    We have different pastors that will teach from the pulpit throughout the year. Yes, you are correct different venues all weekend. HOw nice to be able to worhsip in a venue that you feel more comfortable at. Does that make sense? Not all of us like to worship quietly, or loudly, or in spanish. But at Saddleback you have an opportunity to go to a venue where you are comfortable and have people their with the same likes. Just my two cents. :)

  • http://www.elizabethesther.com Elizabeth Esther

    Suezi: thank you for sharing your “insider” perspective on Saddleback. You provided a more well-rounded perspective than I did. I can appreciate that. I agree that “pastor-worship” (for lack of a better word?) can happen anywhere…not just in big churches. Thank you for taking the time to read and share your thoughts. :)