The last thing the world needs is another idealistic church-planter

The best thing that can happen to a Christian is the death of his idealism. There is almost nothing more dangerous than an idealistic Christian. This is because an idealist is willing to die for his idealism–and make others die for his idealism, too. 

The tragedy here is that idealism rarely has anything to do with solid, Christian living. A Christian who is concerned with actually living according to Biblical principles will quickly discover that it is a rocky, difficult path.

In other words, holiness is difficult. 

An idealist doesn't have time for holiness because he has bigger things to do. Like plant new churches, compose pithy tweets, flat-iron his hair and rant against Religion. 

But make no mistake: the long journey toward holiness is a fiery crucible. It entails self-denial, invisibility, periods of spiritual despair. It doesn't includes cheering crowds or multi-million dollar book deals. At least, for most of us.

The biggest problem I see in emerging, missional, "transformational" churches is spiritual pride, remarkable chiefly for the grandeur of its delusion. It's as if they somehow believe they are immune from making the exact same mistakes they accuse "Religion" of making.

It's a very strange place to find myself. In many ways, I have not strayed too far from the fundamentalism of my childhood. At the very least, fundamentalism attempts to preach a straightforward Gospel and strives to encourage a holy lifestyle.

Either you're saved or you're damned. It's all pretty simple.

The emerging church seems more concerned with tattoos and competing over, as a weary Emerging Mummy notes, "who is posting more buttons on their blog for the One campaign.

I mean, throw the word Hell into an emerging church conversation and watch them totally freak out. Or try Chastity. Now there's a word you don't hear much in emerging circles. Heck, it's difficult enough to hear the word "sin" from the living room couch-cum-pulpit anymore.

Sometimes I feel like the conversation, the "seeking" never ends anywhere. Because it's journey, not the destination that matters, right? It's like that Miley Cyrus song. IT'S THE CLIIIIMBBBB!

Ugh.

I dunno. Maybe the emerging church and Christian idealists are happy to camp out in some nebulous wilderness where "nuance" is everyone's favorite word. But I'm not.

I need meat, not rice cereal. 

My recommendation is that before any Christian idealist sets off to plant a new church, he should try raising a pack of kids. If you ask me, raising kids is the quickest, non-stop flight to holiness precisely because it destroys your idealism. 

But that idealism is replaced by something much, much better: sacrificial love. 

RELATED POSTS:
Losing My Idealism
Unsustainable Zeal
 

This entry was posted in RecoveringFundamentalist, Religion. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.sdsmith.net SD Smith

    Word up.

  • http://thoughtsnwhatnots.blogspot.com LeAnna

    “I need meat, not rice cereal.” Girl, you preach it. Fluffy messages to tickle ears, that’s what the modern day Church has started serving up 24/7. What has happened to teaching Holy living? Not through legalism, but rather sanctification by grace. What has happened to teaching repentance? Because hello. We’re man living in a world under the law of sin and death. What has happened to the straightforward Gospel? What, it’s not “relevant” to our day and age? Jesus Christ and what He did on Calvary’s cross is the most simple message a person will ever hear. Living holy isn’t easy, but praise God we can’t successfully do it on our own, but rather we can rest assuredly in the fact that HE who began a good work in me is faithful to see it to the end.

  • http://mainelymyles.blogspot.com Jo@Mylestones

    “My recommendation is that before any Christian idealist sets off to plant a new church, he should try raising a pack of kids. If you ask me, raising kids is the quickest, non-stop flight to holiness precisely because it destroys your idealism.
    But that idealism is replaced by something much, much better: sacrificial love.”
    YES! You nailed it. (And I loved what Sarah shared yesterday as well.) This is so refreshing to read.

  • http://www.jesstock.blogspot.com Jess

    So much truth here. What a GOOD post. Thanks!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/censtad Chris Enstad

    What about charity.. any room for that because it doesn’t seem you have any room for it here. Thanks be to God for people called to try new things… why do you care so much if they don’t work perfectly if it might have drawn even one person closer to the faith?

    So judgmental!

  • http://ayoungmomsmusings.blogspot.com/ Young Mom

    I love you. Your awesome! Thats all I have to say.

  • http://www.smoochagator.com Smoochagator

    I think what the world needs is MORE idealists! The older I get, the more worn and cynical I am, but I still try to hold on to the ideas of holiness, love (REAL love – love that doesn’t manipulate or coerce), forgiveness and JOY. I will agree, though, that the world does NOT need people who are false. Who don’t admit that life is hard, and that their faith has been painfully tested at times, and that they continually fall short of their ideals.

  • http://ifmeadowsspeak.blogspot.com/ Tammy@If Meadows Speak….

    Girl! Serve up the steak! I like my medium, thank you. :)

  • http://www.musingsofacatholiclady.blogspot.com/ Michelle

    Love it! Great post. Amen and all that other good stuff.

  • Erin

    I totally agree what I take as your point -that real Christianity addresses the straightforward Gospel with transparent honesty, acknowledges the truth of Hell, and encourages us toward a life of holiness. I don’t agree with your essential terminology. The definition of idealism is “the cherishing or pursuit of high or noble principles, purposes, goals, etc.” It is ideal that we press towards holiness right? Have you ever seen a youth group emboldened to preach the Gospel? Those are some of the most idealistic kids you’ll ever meet. They will certainly get jaded somewhere along their journey. But I appreciate their idealism – their singleminded pursuit of a high principle and calling. Again, I totally appreciate your point, so maybe it’s a little thing to quibble about.

  • http://docprocter.wordpress.com K.C. Procter

    Amen!!

  • http://www.joyinthisjourney.com Joy

    I really appreciate this post.

    To the commenters who quibbled with the word “idealist,” I think perhaps they are concerned that we not lose our optimism and hope. Those things are much more pleasant drivers of effort and especially of sacrifice than is duty and “it’s the right thing to do.”

    We need both. As you pointed out, any parent knows that what we imagine things will be like is never the reality. Sometimes “It’s the right thing to do” is the only thing that will propel me through the hard and often-thankless work of raising a family. But I do it in the hope that one day, I will see fruit from all the labor.

  • http://theextraordinaryordinary.blogspot.com Heather of the EO

    I have so much to say and can’t because I have to rush out the door. I hope to remember to come back later for the conversation.

    I’m often a fence-sitter. I look on both sides of me and I see honest seeking, good-intentioned people and I don’t get too fired up anymore because I just, I don’t know, there’s so much anger in it. You know I love your heart and your thoughts…maybe I’m just overwhelmed with thoughts in response because of my own current situation on my personal journey. And so I’m sensitive to how emotions unleashed (idealistic or the opposite) are dangerous. The truth is, we’re all getting it wrong to some extent. The finger-pointing doesn’t sit well with me. Either way.

    OK, I have to stop…ugh…

  • http://civillascybercafe.blogspot.com Civilla

    Boy, that’s the truth about raising children. All your smugness goes away — just ask me — I have two grown children. They’re doing very well…but what a ride along the way!

  • http://www.rachelheldevans.com Rachel H. Evans

    Elizabeth,

    You know I love you and your writing, but you are starting to sound a lot like the fundamentalists you have worked so hard to distance yourself from.

    As an idealistic church-planter who identifies with the emerging church, I couldn’t help but be disappointed to encounter the same sarcasm, stereotypes, misrepresentation, and judgmentalism that I encounter every day from the hyper-conservative evangelical community here on this blog.

    You are right on a lot of counts, of course. Just be careful of assuming that your religious tradition is the only one that fosters holiness, that you and those who think like you are the only ones who crave meat and not rice, that anyone who has a more nuanced (yes, I said nuanced) perspective on heaven and hell is weak, and that those of us who struggle with doubt or who look at faith as a journey are pathetic and stupid.

    I hope that from our limited interactions, you would know that I don’t fit the caricature you have created.

    Or maybe you think I do. You certainly wouldn’t be alone.

  • http://www.rachelheldevans.com Rachel H. Evans

    P.S. Although I’m getting used to it, you gotta know it hurts a little to hear that the last thing the world needs is someone like me. Ouch!

  • http://bellwhistlemoon.blogspot.com/ mary bailey

    I guess I could google it, but I’ll risk looking dumb here: What exactly is an emerging, missional, transformational church?

  • http://www.rachelheldevans.com Rachel H. Evans

    Hey, Mary. The emerging/ missional/ transformational movements within evangelicalism are hard to explain because everyone seems to have a different perspective on it!

    You can visit my blog to get a little idea of what we emerging/missional folks are like: http://www.rachelheldevans.com

    Also, you might want to read this interview with Phyllis Tickle (an Anglican) about her thoughts on the movement: http://www.outofur.com/archives/2007/03/the_future_of_t.html

    Or you can always check out the Wikipedia page; it’s pretty fair! :-)

    (I would like to add that missional and emerging are VERY different and the people who lump them together rarely have any idea what they are talking about. The missional movement is much more theologically-based and broad. The emerging movement – as hard as it is to define – is more culturally, driven; and is probably more likely to be a fad.)

  • http://www.rachelheldevans.com Rachel H. Evans

    By the way, it was through emerging writers that I developed a more “nuanced” perspective on heaven and hell. I grew up believing that all Catholics went to hell. I no longer believe that – in fact, now I really appreciate the perspective my Catholic brothers and sisters bring to the table – thanks to the emerging church.

    So nuance isn’t always a bad thing.

  • http://www.elizabethesther.com Elizabeth Esther

    RACHEL: And I love you and your writing! I can appreciate how this post would be unsettling. And I apologize for making you feel as if I were personally calling you out. I wasn’t. :) But I can definitely understand how you could take it that way. My apologies. ((hugs))

    This post is reflective of my general frustration with a movement that I feel has gone off a cliff in its attempt to be different than, say, conservative evangelicals or fundamentalists.

    The reason I wrote this post is because I have seen first-hand the destruction caused by idealistic, well-intentioned folks who start their own new churches. Yes, my childhood church was an evangelical, fundamentalist church–but the similarities are striking.

    If I am going to deconstruct what went wrong in my childhood church, I have to be honest and share the similarities I see in new churches.

    Sometimes that means I’m going to step on toes. Maybe I’ll even make mistakes. Maybe this post is one of them.

    Maybe it is a journey, after all. :)

  • http://papuagirlindallas.blogspot.com/ Kacie

    Idealism isn’t all bad. Unwise, undisciplined idealism mixed with pride is very dangerous, but then again, unwise undisciplined cynicism is very dangerous too.

    When you said this: “I dunno. Maybe the emerging church and Christian idealists are happy to camp out in some nebulous wilderness where “nuance” is everyone’s favorite word. But I’m not.”
    I resonate with your words, because I too get to a point when I’m in certain parts of evangelicalism where I wonder what exactly they DO believe. I think there is a danger in not being willing to commit.

    However, I don’t think you can paint all of the emerging church as being this sort of idealist. I think it’s a tendency of my generation, but you’re painting with a broad brush here.

  • http://www.emergingmummy.com Sarah@EmergingMummy

    First of all, thank you so much for linking to my post! I really appreciate it, Elizabeth. I have read your blog for months now and find so much to love and learn from here with you and your journey.

    I wanted to say how much I agree with the commenter, Rachel Hall, above though. My post wasn’t really meaning any of those things (meat vs. rice cereal or nuanced theologies) and the tone here felt a bit harsh. Everyone loves to hate the emerging church – it’s the one thing the rest of Christiandom can agree on! :-) I love my EC brothers and sisters, still see them as family.

    I am another one with fairly “nuanced” theologies, very little black and white, but a deep and abiding love of God. I’m pretty unsure about physical realities of hell, pretty open to universalism and as the years pass, less and less sure about the things I was so certain about before.

    I do appreciate what you are trying to say here and I get that. The tone of it seems off for what you are trying to move away from with the fundamentalism. To be honest, it hurt to have your finger pointed so accusingly at us.

    I don’t think that “spiritual pride” is the hallmark of the EC exclusively. It’s the hallmark, unfortunately, of most of the modern Christian religion.

    In addition, I am wary of making statements like “either you’re saved or you’re damned”. That is between each person and God…I do not wish to be in the position of judging another person’s salvation or if they are “holy enough”. I know that’s not your heart or intent though, but it is how it reads.

    My husband is a die-hard idealist. Always has been, always will be. I’m not much of an idealist. However, he is the greatest example of sacrificial love I’ve ever known. So are many other idealists that I personally know. I don’t think that idealism and sacrificial love are at odds at all. Being disillusioned (gratefully so) is a different thing than being idealistic or not.

    God isn’t disillusioned with any of us – he had no delusions in the first place!

    I may not be paying much attention to the movings and workings therein any longer but I’m not quite so harsh as that one line you linked to would indicate either.

    Thanks for opening this up to comments. I know it’s not easy when there is a big discussion and I appreciate your response already posted here in the comments.

    Love to you, sister.

    Sarah

  • Mompom

    I’m a newcomer to your blog. I get what you are saying, and I get that you aren’t really trying to hurt anyone. I too feel allergic to idealism. Not just misguided idealism (although that is the worst of all), but plain old idealism. Also reinventing the wheel of relgion… I’m allergic to that too. That’s why I became Greek Orthodox. No reinventing the wheel there. There are nuances in how heaven and hell is viewed (that are historical, very historical) and the view of the human and God are quite different. For example the doctrine of original sin is not found in orthodoxy. Instead we have something called ancestral sin, which is similar but does not mean I am guilty for Adam’s sin or anything like that. Instead there is an incredible, loving focus on the human as being created in the image of God. And the path of the Christian is unity with God… like divinity with a small d. Always a small d. So here I go, allergic to idealism based on my history with authoritarian, fundamentalist churches… and I go all idealistic looking for a church with historic authenticity and consistency with the creeds of Christendom. Just my two cents. Sometimes it just easier and more authentic for people to quit trying to reinvent the wheel and just join up with a wheel that’s been spinning for centuries.

  • http://www.morningstarr.typepad.com Dina

    I have been reading an excellent book on Christian History lately and am amazed and at times flabbergasted by the ignorant views held by Christians throughout the ages. However misguided they were, many of them were able to face a martyr’s death without fear because they knew their Savior in such a personal way. Sure, they boobed up on a lot of the smaller issues but in the end their authentic faith was undeniable. Not once in the entire study of church history have I come across a person or church pattern that was perfect, that had everything all figured out. Looking around at so many of my fellow believers and hearing friends share disheartening experiences from their own churches, I am convinced that none of us have got it perfect either. But does the perfectionism of it all really matter? Remember when Jesus rebuked his disciples when they were trying to hold the monopoly of doing miracles and were outraged when others were doing the same? I love the dialogue: John spoke up, “Teacher, we saw a man using your name to expel demons and we stopped him because he wasn’t in our group.” (What? Did they think Jesus was going to give them a hi-five here?! Quite contrare…) Jesus wasn’t pleased. “Don’t stop him. No one can use my name to do something good and powerful, and in the next breath cut me down. If he’s not an enemy, he’s an ally. Why, anyone by just giving you a cup of water in my name is on our side. Count on it that God will notice.” I’m more and more ashamed to hear my voice repeating, like the disciple’s, “but he wasn’t in our group!” So what? Whose side is he, are we on? The final Judgment Day isn’t being delayed on account of a shortage of available judges, there is only One on that day. Why expend so much energy this side of heaven trying to figure out who’s really found the narrow(-est) way? God alone can judge the heart. We’re allies, y’all! Let’s just root for each other from a heart of love as we each seek to follow our shared Savior.

    Much love, EE!!

  • Kat

    I heard plenty about “hell”, “chastity”, and “sin” in the church I came out of. And there was no nuance, not a bit.

    And no grace. Or love. Or mercy. Or oxygen. Or Jesus.

    So I’ll stand with the pithy tweeter who cares about global poverty and AIDS and doesn’t have it all figured out. I did my time with the “meat eaters”, and all I have from that are wounds that will never, ever heal.

  • Cathy

    “My recommendation is that before any Christian idealist sets off to plant a new church, he should try raising a pack of kids.”

    I’ll amend your statement a bit, if you don’t mind. Having nearly finished raising ten kids, I often say that everyone needs a rebellious kid. Praise God, none of my kids have been so rebellious that they’ve totally lost their way, but having a difficult kid will cause you to rely on God like no other, and, the added benefit is that I no longer looked down my long nose at young mothers who were attempting to rein in their kids. ONLY God changes the heart, and while our responsibility it to guide, to talk to our kids about Jesus, God, salvation, theology, etc., on a continuum, it is the work of the Spirit that brings change.

    It helps to live with sinners (my husband, my kids, and, oh, yeah, I qualify, as well) who drive you to understand (in a finite way) the depravity from which God saved you, and to remember to keep it humble.

    Cathy

    PS I realize that this is slightly off topic, so feel free to delete it. No big thang (intentionally misspelled and pronounced w/a twang.)

  • http://theextraordinaryordinary.blogspot.com Heather of the EO

    This post was bumping around my head and heart all day yesterday. I had a lot of time to think because I had to drive about four hours.

    I came back because I’m STILL thinking about it. I appreciated what other commenters who didn’t agree with the tone of the post said, so I don’t need to repeat that. But that’s just it, I wasn’t thinking all day yesterday about which kind of church is right or wrong or what label I agree or don’t agree with…

    I was thinking about the tone. It hit me in the face that I don’t like it, and yet I’VE been carrying it for a very long time. I had to face that what needs to happen for me is that I need to stop. I need to move on. I turned to my Dad in the car after we talked about all the finger-pointing and anger and stereotypes and divisions and I said “I can’t do it anymore, it’s making me sick.” I don’t want to sit with my God and tell Him that what I accomplished for today was to make sure everyone knows that I think a bunch of people, HIS people, are idiots.

    I’m not saying that’s what you did here, I’m talking about how this post turned thoughts over in my mind that needed thinking. I wanted to just be upset and ruminate on all of it and I just can’t anymore. My finger-pointing turned inward and I saw that just because I sit in the middle, not “conservative” and not “idealstic” THAT DOES NOT MAKE ME RIGHT. There is just too much of the self-righteous stuff I claim to hate sitting right here in my heart.

    You said that these people should have kids. I’m guessing many of them do. I just wanted to add that YES, my kids are teaching me sacrifice, but you know what? I fought it. I fought it so hard and I drank it away every night because my selfishness was winning. It didn’t matter that I became a mother…what does matter is what I DO with that NOW. You know what really humbled me? Realizing that I was throwing it away, this beautiful job, this beautiful gift, in the same way we all piss things away no matter what the job or role or stereotype. That’s humbling. In a way there are no words to describe.

    And now, in the coming clean, in the knees to the floor I AM NOTHING? Surrender? Powerlessness? Redemption? twelve step programs and treatment? How the hell did that happen? I don’t know , but I’m finding “church” here because all else is stripped away. Even how much I thought I was sacrificing as a mother. Even that.

    Sorry I wrote a book in your comments. Really. I don’t mean to vent all over you, this is my process. And I’m more thankful for it that I can say. Thank you. Really. Your post triggered something deep within that I needed to see. A mirror of sorts. I hardly know you, I’m not saying you’re doing what I was doing, I’m simply saying something changed in me in this space. So thank you.

  • http://teasinglydiverse.blogspot.com Amanda

    I have really enjoyed reading your blog the past few months. I feel like I’ve gotten to know your heart, so when I read this I ran my reactions through what I assume was the good place you were coming from. I’m not a part of an “emerging church” but I spent a lot of time studying the movement in college and some of my dearest friends and loved ones are those hair-straightening, twittering, idealists you called out in this post.
    I’m not going to say much more, because I think others have expressed my initial reactions (and residual ones, having read this yesterday) and I’ve also read your responses in the comments.
    I’d just add that I think a lot of these movements is also generational. When I read things like this saying the last thing we need is more idealistic church planters, I can’t help but think that what that really says is the last thing the world needs is my generation. I know that’s probably not what you intended to say with this post, really. But it’s a tiny part of what it made me feel, and I thought I’d share that.

  • http://darcysheartstirrings.blogspot.com/ Darcy

    I’ve been thinking about what you wrote here for a few days now. It seems that you and I have very similar backgrouds (extreme fundie church, spiritually abusive system). My need to be right, to understand what I believe about every little point, has left me exhasted. Because there are things in my life that I can’t seem to work out, to reconcile in my mind. And so, I have learned to rest in Who God is and enjoy the journey. I am finally OK with not knowing what I think or believe about matters of doctrine. In my old church, that would have never been OK. Your very salvation depended on your belief in the “right” doctrine. I needed my Emerging friends to give me a different perspective; to teach me to be still and know that He is God, even if that’s the only thing I CAN know. For me, “camping out in a nebulous wilderness” is exactly what I need right now. And the peace and relief has been amazing. Of course, I could be wrong because I don’t really know you, but perhaps you are uncomfortable with that idea because it’s exactly what you need too. I’m looking at this time in my life as part of my own healing-journey…a much needed part.

  • C’est la Bee

    I disagree that an idealist doesn’t have time for holiness. I think an idealist who has Christ as his example and tries to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord will walk in humility, and faithfulness, and goodness with Christ being his ideal, or standard of perfection.

    I don’t think somebody who is ego-centric and prideful has time for holiness. If they are only living according to their own ideals of “being big for God” and their own standard is their idea of perfection, than yes, their idealism is only self-focused. We don’t need more of these either.

    Any church, old, new, emerging, fundamental, evangelical, traditional, transforming can fall into error if they focus on what they are DOING rather than WHO they claim they are following. When we try to make ourselves holy yes it is very difficult, even impossible. When we allow God to make us holy it is far less complicated. There will be trials because scripture tells us that, but that is because the enemy does not want our lives to be seen by others. If we could but live the words we read in Col 3:15-17 -
    Let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in one body; and be thankful. Let the word of £Christ richly dwell within you, with all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with thankfulness in your hearts to God. Whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks through Him to God the Father.

    We would then be living a life of holiness by who we are every day and what we do every day.

  • http://www.minthegap.com MInTheGap

    Could that be why any deacon or pastor of a church should be one that rules his house well? :)