To Bikini or Not to Bikini—THAT is the question, yo!

“Mom, I’m the only one wearing a one-piece,” my oldest daughter told me yesterday after attending a friend’s swim party. “Everyone else is wearing bikinis!”

“Did anyone say anything?” I asked.

“No.”

“I doubt anyone thought you looked weird or out of place,” I offered.

“I know,” she said. “But I felt weird. I felt different.”

And there it is. Part of me wants to repeat what I was told growing up: Christians ARE different. It’s never easy to be different from your peers, but looking back–I’m glad I learned that lesson while I was young. It has given me a certain strength of resolve I wouldn’t have if my parents had been more permissive.

Being different–insofar as it is the kind of different that bespeaks moral virtue–is good!

On the other hand, I don’t want to be so strict that in a few years my daughter will land on Facebook, flaunting her tatted up bikini body. OK, I know that sounds extreme but I just saw it the other day: a very wholesome Christian girl I used to babysit had all these pictures up on FB–posing in her bikini with a huge tattoo across her side.

I can’t say I was super surprised–that girl’s parents were among the strictest, harshest and most extreme I ever knew–but I still felt disappointed. It made me think about my own daughters and I felt this sudden wave of worry: if my daughters ever do that, I’ll be distraught.

And then I think about how hypocritical that is of me–especially since I make very few prohibitions about what my daughters can wear. Still, I feel like I need to draw the line somewhere. I’m drawing it at: Eleven Years Old Is Too Young For A Bikini.

And if she asks when she’ll be old enough, I’m going with: 96 years old.

But my daughter still wants to know why. WHY won’t I let her wear a bikini?

Because….

Because….

Because YOU’RE STILL A LITTLE GIRL!! AND I WON’T HAVE ANYBODY OGLING MY BABY!

*deep breath*

OK. So I didn’t really say that, my brain just exploded inside with those words. What I really said was: “Let me talk to Daddy and I’ll get back to you on that.”

So, I went to talk with my husband about it. I told him about the girl we used to know who is all over FB in her bikini and tattoo.

And he said, “It’s not about control. It’s about relationship.”

That was it.

See? It takes me like 500 words to say exactly what he says in 7 words.

Which I means: it’s not really about the bikini. It’s about my relationship with my daughter.

So, in the context of relationship, I want to have a conversation with my daughter about purity, chastity and why I’m not comfortable with her wearing a bikini. Yet. I just hope I can do this without freaking out.

Got any tips for me?

What are you thoughts on bikinis? Do you allow tankinis?
What sorts of conversations do you have about swimsuits?
Do you outlaw bikinis altogether? Or do you make modified rules?

This entry was posted in Her Royal Mommy-Ness, Parenting--toughest job out there. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://somewiseguy.com ThatGuyKC

    You married a very wise man. Are you compiling a gift size book of his wise quips? I’ll buy a copy.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      It would be a very short book. Pithy, I think is the descriptor. :)

      • Christine

        As a mom of three daughters, my advice is different now that they are 15, 18, and 27. I used to make these issues more of a battle by being over-dictatorial. Looking back, I see how it is much better to begin such a shopping trip with “honey, you have such good judgment, I know we’ll find a bathing suit that we both like” and then shop and have FUN with it. 2-piece, or 1-piece – don’t make an arbitrary rule – try the suits on, and you may find that you and your daughter agree on what looks nice. If not, compromise, and don’t make the mistake of getting in a fight over something so relatively minor.

  • Ashley Anderson

    I don’t have the perfect answer for you, but I have this to offer:

    My mom never needed to battle the bikini. Maybe she never cared. She kept busy fostering those beautiful qualities of her daughters’ personalities and character. Your daughter will one day wear a bikini, be it 15 or 18, but it’s the self-esteem she wears with it that matters.

    • KT

      I have to agree, I don’t feel that bikinis are the issue here, it’s Where she is and what she’s doing while she is wearing her bikini that matters. As for other people (men), you can’t control what they are thinking and if they are really sick enough to think naughty things then they will think just as much in a one piece. Save your battles for something bigger.

  • Mezzanine

    There’s a fair bit of range between one-piece and bikinis. I wear a tank top and “boy shorts” – giving me two piece bathers while still covering up my midriff.

    Maybe you could discuss some of the alternatives with her, and figure out which styles you could both be happy with?

  • http://emaconly.blogspot.com/ Emily M.

    I’m 17 (18 at the end of the summer) and have never worn a bikini. Ever. It’s not the end of the world.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      WHAT?! It’s not the end of the world?! B-b-b-but! Whhhhyyyyy?

  • http://amongwomenpodcast.blogspot.com/ Pat Gohn

    In my house we called it the “no BS” rule. No bellies showing, No boobies showing (including cleavage), no bums/buttocks showing, and in other non-bathing outfits, no bras showing either. It helped that I counterbalanced this “tough” rule with a generous summer wardrobe allowance in other areas, for example, like accessorizing with cute sandals/bags/sunglasses/cover-ups/beach gear, etc while being very strident in this rule.

    • Heather

      I love this and think I will be using this one myself. I also like the summer wardrobe allowance that allows for other cute summer accessories. Great idea!

    • Meg

      This is the most awesome rule ever! I grew up one of 5 girls with 2 brothers and was never allowed to wear bikinis and emerged totally unscathed an empowered as a result. Have you seen how teenage girls wearing nothing parade nervously around the pool? IT is so sad. ANyway, thanks for this discusion Elizabeth but thanks even more to Pat for the most awesome way to state your rule ever. I am totally stealing it…I already have 3 girls!

  • http://thepartythatneverquits.blogspot.com Jen

    My daughter (8) is very long in the body, and incredibly slender. Anything but a one piece looks… Fleshy. Even tankinis are too short. My husband does not want midrif showing. I don’t think she cares, or notices. Plus, she has cute swimmers ;) But had tankinis fit, we would allow those, with either briefs or boylegs.

    Perhaps let your husband talk to your daughter on this one? Dads can offer a completely different perspective on the issue than mums. Or, better yet, do it together. That way you can both be mean ;)

    Maybe, and I think this is what I’ll use on my daughter if the situation ever arises… “Would you walk into school/church/the mall with just your knickers and bra on?” Hopefully the answer would be no, so I would then reply, “ok, so in light of that, are you able to justify a bikini as an appropriate state of attire to be wearing in the pool around everyone?”. Again, hopefully the answer is no. (if it’s not, you’re on your own, I’ve got nuthin’ ;) ) Allow her to (guided) come to the correct conclusion on her own. She’s at an age where she’s wanting to create her own moral standards, while at the same time craving boundaries.

    Anyways, I look forward to hearing the outcome of this :)

    • http://simply-rea.blogspot.com Rea

      I think I’d be careful in using that argument if you have an exceptionally logical child, because of course the reasonable comeback would then be “well, I wouldn’t walk into those places wearing a one-piece swimsuit either” and then once again you are stuck trying to explain why one is ok and the other isn’t.

      But I do agree that guiding her to come up with the conclusion on her own rather than just laying down the law will help to build relationship.

      But then, I have boys so I don’t really have much to say here. I guess unless they suddenly decide they want to wear Speedos, but I think we can all agree that there’s just something wrong with Speedos.

      • Meg

        I would say that as a mother of a boy you should have a place at the table on this discussion. As a mother of boys and girls who I want to raise to be chaste adults I think there is no denying that puberty is a difficutly time for the young male trying to live chastely and bikinis really don’t help in that regard!

    • http://flourishingmother.blogspot.com Andrea@FlourishingMother

      i agree, dads talking to daughters about this is powerful, albeit maybe uncomfortable for both but powerful.

  • http://sevenlittleaustralians.blogspot.com/ Erin

    I was about to answer ‘no’ (daughters 17, 9 & 6) when I remembered my 17yr old currently wears a tankini, so hard to find one pieces. Her tankini (described above) comes down to the top of her boys leg shorts. Which are smart and modest. but no, younger girls do not, forming good boundaries still there.
    My standard answer to these questions; bikini’s, is top too low, pants too tight etc is; “Do you look like a lady?” My mum’s pithy standard was; “tight enough to know you are a woman, loose enough to know you are a lady.” sums it up and the girls ‘get it’ without further discussion.

    I wouldn’t agree to a tankini if a daughter was a boundary pusher, I watched a friend’s daughter who was and as soon as mum’s back was turned, top was folded up etc. Form good habits and boundaries whilst daughter is young, but be flexible enough to realise as daughter grows those boundaries will change a little.

    It is all about communication, why we say no, and dialogue, listening to feedback and occasionally changing your stand. (Not about bikini’s though;)

  • Donna

    I’ve never worn a bikini either, and now that I don’t have the figure for one anymore, kind of wish I did when I had the chance… but I completely understand what you’re saying about your daughter. Mind is nearly 8, hasn’t worn a bikini yet, and probably won’t. And we will probably have the same conversation you are having with your girl. I’m waiting with interest to hear what happens next!

  • Andrea

    I was never allowed to wear a bikini and for the most part was fine with it. I now have a daughter (7mths) and I won’t even put her in a bikini. I am fine with a tankini, that’s what I wear. I don’t do boy shorts or skirts though. Skirts are, well, it looks like you are trying to hide something without really hiding it and boy shorts tend to roll up and then your butt is hanging out or you look weird always unrolling them. I say a tankini is a good compromise. It’s still modest, cute, stylish and it gives you the feeling of a two piece. Plus, it really is all about the communication with your daughter. Talking about what the motive is behind wearing a bikini is what it comes down to, purity, honor etc…

  • Stephanie

    My girls are 2 and 11 months so no need for a bikini talk yet… but I have had discussions with my girlfriends about that subject often, and my little sister who is turning 17. My mom the ever wise woman that she is, has often ask the question- Why does the girl desire to wear a bikini?As, a married woman now I do wear a two piece * a top with a skirt bottom, but I am in tune with my motivation and how to carry myself in the outfit, part of protecting my girls in maybe having a one piece is that they are developing that ability to understand their reponsiblity in how they carry themselves and the affect they have on the opposite sex. Its like giving a car to a child who cannot reach the petals. I wore a two piece when I was 16 and up, and although not perfect I believe looking back I was aware of my responsiblity and tried to act accordingly to that in how I carried myself in that two piece. I often think of that verse, do not awaken or arouse love until it so desires is a huge guideline in these matters. When I was 15, I cut these shorts and my mom had told me not to, and expecting a punishment for disobedience my mom said” she was just sad that I thought my legs would be more attractive if they were shorter, that she wanted me to see how beautiful my legs already were, even in longer shorts. It stuck with me, my mom taught the principle behind the rules. Beauty is fading but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised. My girls will have rules about what they can wear but I desire for the rules to just protect them while I pray God develops in them the character.

  • Laughingmomma

    Sent you an email on subject after your tweet…just checked my email, it didn’t go through until a minute ago…AND then I see your blog post….a day late and dollar short…

  • http://www.lara-thinkingoutloud.blogspot.com Lara Laity

    My mom let me wear a bikini as soon as i wanted to, I had a super modest one at age ten or so, the top was like a sports bra and i didn’t have boobs yet. I had a bra top bikini my freshman year of highschool and I felt uncomfortable in it and then chose to wear more modest suits after that.

    I can’t think of anything bad that ever happened to me because I wore a bikini…or to my parents…or to any men around me.

    Just thought I’d share another side to the story, since everyone above seems to be freaked out about bikinis.

    p.s. my daughter is only 5 so I’m not dealing with this as a parent yet!

    • Kim

      How do you know what did or didn’t happen to the men around you? Just curious, I have teenage sons and they tell me how hard it is at a public beach.

  • http://SheilaScribbles.blogspot.com SheilaScribbles

    This is an issue that has plagued me. My daughter is also 11. We made the decision for no bikinis or 2 piece suits when she was a baby – and I’d see lots of 1 year olds at the pool in 2 piece suits. We also instituted no spaghetti straps. My thinking was that when she was little it was cute, but how could I then say later – that’s not appropriate now? I felt it would be easier to let up than to reign in. We bought her first tankini 2 years ago and she didn’t like it as much as she thought she would. She’s very long waisted and it kept coming up. We just bought one this year and I hesitated because she looks quite grown up in it. She’s already 5’1″ and “developing”. My husband and I have talked this over many times about modesty and appropriateness. I am starting to let up a little, but I am sticking to the rule that “no bra straps” and no butt cheeks should show. She’s a little heavy right now as we wait for puberty to hit (it runs early in my family), and I’m trying to teach her the best I can about modesty and respect for yourself. Growing up super strict (I wasn’t allowed to go swimming with boys or wear pants or make up, etc.), she certainly has it MUCH “looser” than I did – but she still has to deal with what she sees as strict compared to her friends. It’s a journey of discovery for both of us. I pray a lot for wisdom.

  • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

    We don’t tend to fight with our kids over clothes. Too many other things that are much more important, though we (and by ‘we’ I really mean my wife – since I don’t have much advice to offer when it comes to clothes) do tend to steer them away from fashion faux pas. Bikinis vs. one piece swim suits have never been an issue for us at any age. My youngest daughter (14) generally has at least one each two-piece and one-piece bathing suits most years. If she suddenly wanted the skimpiest of string bikinis at this age (which isn’t an issue for us), we would probably discuss it and set a limit there. But it would be with the realization that it would be a limit with a pretty short lifespan. In just a couple of years she might have a part-time job and be driving.

    Especially after our experiences with my older son, we do try to save the battles for things that really matter. And clothes rarely make the cut. In the grand scheme of things, they just aren’t that important. I’ve also never been in the group who believes that a little girl bikini or tankini is somehow automatically “sexualizing” a seven or eight year old. Which is not to say that there isn’t a lot of sexualization of children going on in our culture. There is. But that line is not simply between one-piece and two-piece swimming suits. It’s more complicated than that. Heck, we buy our granddaughter swimming suits each year (because we have better ones down here) and if I recall correctly, one of those this year was a cute little, frilly purple and pink bikini.

    I’ve never understood this particular obsession in some Christian circles. An awful lot of unwarranted attention and focus seems to be placed on it.

    • Lindsey

      Well, I think it’s just simply…a bikini looks like a bra and panties.

  • http://www.andtheycallherblesssed.blogspot.com Jessica

    someone once told me – look in the mirror and see how far down the shirt goes, or how high the skirt goes…. if you would be comfortable with a man walking up and putting his hand there then ok. Because his eyes and then his mind are probably already touching it…. that opened my eyes!

    • Liz Muller

      Um, no – I disagree with this categorically… By this logic I ought to be wearing a burqa. If I went out and some guy touched my neck or my knees if I were wearing a perfectly modest shorts and t-shirt – I’d still freak out. Our boundaries with clothing are not equal to our boundaries with touch.

      Furthermore, it is really quite sexist to accuse men of being this lascivious. Sure, some sex maniacs and sickos out there may be thinking about touching whatever skin on a girl they are looking at happens to be showing, but NOT the vast majority of men.

      I wore a bikini and do consider myself modest. I don’t think I’d allow it though until later in the teenage years though – I do think it’s more of a grown-up clothing item.

  • http://www.thoughts-of-home.blogspot.com Carole

    This is such a tricky thing. Not only are you trying to figure out how to communicate value and worth to your daughter, you’re not wanting to teach her judgementalism at the same time. ‘Cause that’s an easy side effect of convincing her to wear a one piece, isn’t it?

    I grew up not allowed to wear bikinis or strappy tank tops and now I don’t feel comfortable wearing either. It’s been interesting to note that shirts that show more shoulder/and/or neck than usual get compliments from my husband, “Mmmm, I like this shirt on you ’cause I can see your shoulders…” Hunh. To me it’s confirmed that the little things can make a difference. (FWIW)

    I wonder if there’s a way to gently explain that a bikini can take the focus away from who she is as a person, as a young woman. And perhaps discuss together an older age when she will be allowed to make that decision herself. I wonder if she knew that she won’t always have to wear a bikini ….. would help in the interim?

  • http://www.coffeestainedclarity.com Bethany

    Good discussion! I think I’m going to be in the vast minority here, but I’ll offer up my opinion anyway. ::deep breath::

    I was raised in a home with very strict standards of modesty… and I hated those standards. They weren’t mine. They weren’t even my parents’ really… They were the standards taught to them in seminars and conservative publications, and my parents in turn passed them down to me along with the concept that showing body shape was inciting lust.

    However (and I think I’ve commented about this on your blog before), my absurd, baggy bathing suits garnered far more attention than my friends’ normal two-pieces did, and I wanted more than anything to stop standing out by covering up so much. As soon as I could, I spent my babysitting money on a secret halter two-piece that I wore away from home, and I can tell you these three things:
    - Wearing it did not turn me into a slut (I believe how a girl carries herself has far more impact than what clothes she is wearing),
    - The attention I had been getting over my swim attire decreased dramatically, and
    - I slowly began to realize that bathing suit style wasn’t such a big deal after all… to the point that I felt confident and happy reverting back to a one-piece when I went away to college.

    Now that I have young daughters, I do my best not to make a big deal about bodies one way or the other. Since we live in Italy where women exclusively wear bikinis (if not less), we all wear two-pieces to the beach. We don’t show off, we don’t stand out, and my conscience is at peace with the arrangement. If we lived in a different country, we might want to revise our wardrobe based on cultural sensitivity, but I don’t think I’ll ever be comfortable with the notion that allowing a child to wear a bikini is sexualizing her. (I don’t want to offend anyone with this statement, but if you look at a ten-year-old at the beach and immediately start thinking about sex, you need to have a long, hard look inside your own head.)

    Any tips for you? Go with your husband’s great advice. Continue focusing on your relationship with your daughter (maybe even being open to a compromise with her). And last but certainly not least, stay far, far away from clown-inspired swimwear. :)

    • Debra

      I love your reply.

  • Venessa

    Hi Elizabeth, I have a 19 and 20 year old that have never worned a bikini and have never wanted to :) What I taught my daughters was love. Love for God and their brothers in Christ and this was done over the years and long into the night. It was fun and relationship building, firstly between them and their Heavenly Father and as Mum and daughter.

    And do you want to know something even funnier my girls chose to wear swim tops and board shorts in public – LOL. They have very nice figures and are comfortable with their figures they just know that certain parts of their bodies are for their one and only.

    Don’t worry my girls are not prudish. One is studying to be a fashion designer and other other one is married and she choose sexy undergarments and swim wear for the privacy of her husband, for his eyes only and I can tell you it even made me blush ;)

    This is a wonderful opportunity to teach truth, install truth or confirm truth into your daughter’s life. Trust me the rewards are worth it and if it is done in the spirit of love and she receives it in the spirit of love, she will not become bitter because God always does His good work in His little children because He is love and He loves us!!!

  • KatR

    I’m curious what your daughter’s idea of a bikini is (and what her friends are wearing). Except for showing the stomach, I’ve seen two pieces that hold everything in and one pieces that let it all hang out.

    • http://tinytwig.typepad.com tiny twig/hayley

      i totally agree, kat. and i almost think that a speedo (or similar) 2 piece on an 8 year old is much less sexual than a revealing tankini on a 13 year old. i don’t know…i am glad i have boys! i was “convicted” as a teenager (mostly by youth groups led by Christian men) that I was responsible for men not lusting after me. Obviously, that flawed thinking led to a lot of misguided notions about my body and sexuality. I am glad not to have to walk through that whole thing with daughters. But, thank you for the tough women who are! I thank you for raising strong and soft women.

  • Katy-Anne

    I’m baffled as to why it’s not ok to wear just underwear when we go out in public, but if we make it in spandex with a pretty pattern we can wear our underwear to the beach or pool. It’s still underwear, even if it’s a one-piece.

    However, with that said, I don’t understand why a parent would allow that much skin be shown with a one piece and then then be against a two piece. I mean, yes, in a bikini you can see her belly, but, you can see her legs and thighs in a one piece and as far as I know legs and thighs are more sexy to most men than bellies are. Neither one or two pieces cover up that much.

    If it were me I’d probably “compromise” and go the tankini route if your daughter finds one she likes and is willing to go with that compromise.

    Haha I want my kids either in the full body suit types or board shorts and a swim t-shirt, only it has as much to do with sun safety as it does with modesty. :p My grandfather died of cancer from a melanoma, and my dad has had lots of skin cancers from the sun, we want to be careful.

  • http://Chaseafterwind.blogspot.com Amy B

    I don’t mean to offend anyone who disagrees, but I don’t think ANYONE should wear a bikini, regardless of age. There is no way a bikini can be modest, and we are supposed to be modest at all times. It is as simple as that. So, I think if it were my daughter, I would leave her age out of it and focus on modesty, chastity, respect, etc.

    But then again, I only have an eight month old son. Thank goodness! :-P

  • Amanda

    I think the simplest argument against bikinis is that you wouldn’t go out in public in your bra and underwear, why is it okay just because the material is a little different? Just because everyone else does it?

    In addition to the topic of modesty I would try to discuss with your daughter why she wants to wear a bikini so badly. It doesn’t seem like she’s thinking about “flaunting her stuff” or anything like that, just simply that she wants to fit in. I think I would focus my attention there… because sooner or later the “fitting in” issue is going to be something way more serious than a bathing suit. Good luck!

  • Sharon O

    I love the ‘context of relationship’ comment, and to add ‘my relationship with you is precious and I don’t want someone looking at you in a wrong way’. And you are not old enough… the answer is no.
    Don’t ask me again.
    From an older ‘grandma’ my own daughter did not wear bikini’s till she was out of my house. At that point I had no control, with her three girls now she says “NO”.

  • http://silly-bear.com Sarah@From Tolstoy to Tinkerbell

    I just recently bought my daughter’s yearly swimsuit–a tankini. She’s 8, and for me, a tankini just makes swimming so much easier especially when it comes to going to the bathroom. So much simpler to pull down the bottoms than to wrestle with a wet one piece suit. My bathing suit choice for her is what is easy. I think your husband is right–this is more about the relationship than a bathing suit.

  • Denise

    I have a 10 year old who looks 14—5’3, 34B on top. She has never worn a bikini, though a tankini is okay. Honestly, many tankinis cover more than the one-pieces out there.
    Most of our teaching has focused on self-respect; that while wearing a revealing garment (of any kind) may not indicate what your true self is like, it gives an impression to other people. Sort of like the book/cover thing—it may not be accurate in how good the text is, but it usually tells what type of story it is.

  • hope t.

    I am a good decade older than you, EE, so I am coming from the perspective of a different generation. Also, personality-wise, I have been a “fuddy-duddy” ever since I can remember. For me, the question is not about when a girl is old enough for a bikini but when is she too old. As little girls, my sister and I wore two-piece bikinis. They were adorable. I wonder if anyone else here is old enough to remember the suits that had a row of snaps under the top so that you could snap on a layer over your belly if you chose. I often chose the snap-on between the ages of eight and ten. Then, when I was about eleven, I switched to one-piece suits since that is the age when I started becoming more womanly.

    I probably have not entered the 21st century yet in my thinking about girls’ clothing but a lot of the clothes I see make me hurt for the girls who feel they must wear them to look “normal”. It is so different from the sweet and adorable outfits we had back in my day. I think the issue my seem small but it symbolic of much deeper attitudes, attitudes about the meaning of persons. Believe it or not, this is one reason why I wanted all boys (and I do have only boys). Hugs to all who are struggling through this complexity with their daughters.

  • http://humbled-pie.blogspot.com/ Kari

    Our focus with our girls on modesty has been that “this we do for the good of our brothers in Christ” if for no other reason…

    We’re passionate about this subject because of the number of Christian men and teens my husband (a licensed counselor for more than a decade) has counseled with addictions and issues who are torn up over the fact that they there is NO “safe place” for them to let down their guard – not even church or Bible studies! (And they are from all walks of life and even hold all types of “positions” within our churches; no man, young or old, is necessarily exempt from the temptations.)

    Since our girls are on the young side (I have 2 tweens: 9.5 and 12), and they are *girls* (even at 40 I don’t understand the male brain and how it is wired in this way!), we have explained it to them in terms of Rita’s custard, which they adore, but can no longer eat since we went gluten free several months ago…We talk about how awful it would be if *everywhere* they went there were people eating Rita’s custard when they knew they could not have it and were trying not to think about it. But everywhere they went, there it was: the grocery store, the neighborhood, the post office, the library (yeah, boring lives here), the pool – *especially* the pool – people eating Rita’s custard Then they thought, well surely the one safe place I can go without having to think about custard – which is good, because I want my focus to be on *God* – is worship on Sunday morning…but, no, they walk in and there a third of the fellowship is eating Rita’s custard. And the people eat it at Bible study, and Youth Group, and, and, and…

    Until lately, we have been going by “instinct” and my husband’s discretion in choosing/allowing the girls to choose clothes – developed in part by the frustrations he has heard in numerous counseling sessions and groups for years and which clothes are most troubling to his clients. And we started very young. I have felt it would always be easier – in every aspect of parenting – to ease up on limits, etc. as my girls mature than it would be to start towing the line more and more…if necessary. I wasn’t necessarily concerned about my 3, 6, or 8 year old being a stumbling block; I was concerned with establishing patterns and habits.

    I recently came across a survey done (superbly) by The Rebelution (Google “rebelution modesty survey”) in 2007 which had over 1,600 respondents – Christian teens, young men, and men. If you do Google it, be sure to read the explanation for how to interpret the results and how exactly it works…at first glance it may seem to contradict itself.

    It’s a treasure trove in terms of helping my daughters (and me) understand the male mind, and I expect we will refer back to it often. It’s definitely nothing to get legalistic about or to use as a strict measuring stick! But it gives us a place to check our thoughts against those of the very people we are trying to serve in our modest dress.

    For instance, while a part of me hesitated a little when my oldest wanted a shrug, I thought perhaps I was being too strict. But my husband’s eyes about popped out of his head when he saw her out of the house in one for the first time. His solution at the time (while we were out) was that she needed to tie it more loosely. Seeing the survey, I understand a little better.

    Nearly 60% of the respondents agreed (respondents answering “agree” or “agree strongly”) that shrugs draw too much attention to the bust…that’s a pretty big number. So of the five guys in her Sunday School class, she might be hindering 3 out of 5 of them. If I put in the perspective of which 3 of them don’t I care about – with faces on the numbers – it makes it more real to me!

    It would be *wonderful* if both of my girls desired to dress “modestly” because it was in their heart to do so. But quite frankly, I don’t think they even really “get it”, and may not for several years yet, what our clothes say about us, etc., etc… I think they’ll both get there eventually. But honestly, I didn’t start following Christ until I was 20 and it was still many years after that before I *understood* the call to modesty. Now I grieve for times I may have been a stumbling block to my brothers in Christ, knowing what I know.

    I’ve heard parent after parent say that unless it’s in a girl’s own heart to dress modestly, it is pointless to argue over it..I couldn’t disagree more strongly.

    Inasmuch as the clothes are a factor in their own hearts, yes, as I stated above.

    But we set the standard in our home that we don’t knowingly become stumbling blocks to others. As a rule, we’d never offer a glass of wine to an alcoholic. We don’t put in reach of our children things we don’t want them reading or seeing (yet – as they are still children). And we aren’t letting them leave the house wearing clothes that will unduly tempt the young ( and older) men we love. (And my twelve year old is developing to the point she could certainly be a stumbling block.) (Yes, the girls could always change their clothes when they leave the house and we can’t stop them…but there will be consequences when we find out. (so long as they live under our roof (and aren’t paying rent))

    While we’ve always had a “no bikini” rule, now we can point to the survey in which 84.3 percent of some 1600 Christian men – young and old – stated they agreed a bikini is immodest.

    It *is* all about relationship – but it is about more than just the parent/child relationship. It is also about our relationship with God and what He asks of us in our relationships to and with our brothers and sisters in Him!

    • Katy-Anne

      Blaming girls for the sins of men is just simply not appropriate. How about just making the men take responsibility for their own lusts and teaching daughters to be modest because it is right, without all the extra baggage?

      • hope t.

        I don’t see Kari’s comment as blaming girls for a man’s sin. Even though I am a married woman, I can relate a little bit (obviously not completely) with her comment about there being no “safe places”. I went to get my son a new pair of glasses and the very nice young woman who helped us had a LOT of cleavage showing. This was not an isolated incident but is becoming common place even in business establishments. Several comments have touched on the cultural nature of this phenomenon and I think there is something to be said for that. But this is a very recent cultural change. Ten, or even five years ago, I did not see this. It is going to take a while for some of us to catch up to this fad and I can hardly imagine what it is like for a young man to have to go get a pair of glasses and get an eyeful instead. It is really sad and difficult and I guess if there is anyone to “blame”, it would be the fashion designers who are lining their pockets by pedaling these styles of clothing and bathing suits and selling the idea that women uncovering themselves for public viewing is “normal”.

      • Venessa

        Because love is more than just doing what’s right for ourselves it sometimes involves giving up our freedoms for the better of someone else. The reason is because God loved you so much that He gave His Best – His Son.

        If God places this value on you who am I to love you any less :)

        • http://humbled-pie.blogspot.com/ Kari

          Was going to respond, but don’t see any need. Hope and Venessa did so beautifully.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      If your husband is counseling addicts the issue is ADDICTION, not the complaint that there is no “safe” place for them to let down their guard. That’s a cop-out. If we’re going to use the alcoholism analogy–alcoholics could also say there is “no safe place.” Alcoholics learn in AA not to blame other people or situations for their addiction. Even a woman in a burqa isn’t “safe” from an addict/sexual predator. I’m not about to tell my daughters they can’t wear certain clothing because an ADDICT might get tempted. YIKES!

      I think Jo’s comment is much more in line with my perspective.

      That said, I *do* believe I have a responsibility to dress appropriately…but how that works out, exactly, will look different for all of us.

      • hope t.

        I really hope that Kari comes back here to clarify because I feel like I am speaking for her. I realize that I am seeing her comment from a very different perspective than others here. My sense is that her husband is primarily working with porn addicts NOT primarily rapists and child molesters. I have seen statistics that upwards of 50 percent of evangelical men use porn. Since we all know that men, even those who have never used porn, are visually stimulated by seeing certain parts of the female body unclothed, I think it is a kindness for women to cover those parts of their bodies. Wearing a high necked one-piece suit with a lining rather than a bikini top does not in any way hurt a woman but it just might prevent a man (or another woman) from seeing things they are trying hard not to see. I am sorry if I am interpreting this issue and this particular comment in the wrong manner and I am certainly willing to try to see the other side, if that is the case.

      • http://humbled-pie.blogspot.com/ Kari

        Those addicts are husbands, fathers, sons, brothers, and future husbands, fathers, and sons. Most of all they are children of God. They are loved by Him and in the case of followers of Christ, have been redeemed by Him. He has mercy and grace for *all* of us even in all of our own sin – including addicts, no matter to what they are addicted. And in the case of the men who are seeing my husband, they are in treatment because they don’t *want* to be this way and are doing all they can to fight the addiction.

        For the record, an Addict is not a predator! Predators generally have an addiction, however the vast (vast!) majority of men addicted to porn do not act on their thoughts outside their own minds. The issue for them is impure thoughts, impure hearts, and knowing that those thoughts impure thoughts are harmful. And the issue of impure thoughts is not the primary issue for a man who is not following Jesus. The primary issue for that man is to accept Jesus as Lord and develop a relationship with God, Himself. I feel certain that is God’s primary concern for Him – all else follows after that. Hence, our focus that what we do we do for our brothers in Christ. Not that we don’t want to honor *all* men, but the man who *is* a predator has bigger issues than anything we wear can help him avoid.

        I don’t mean to suggest, and I don’t think I did suggest, that men should be absolved of any responsibility. Back to the analogy, my children have a responsibility to not eat gluten (because of how it affects their health), no matter what the temptation. No matter what is placed before them, it’s ultimately their responsibility. If they tried to blame someone for it, I would be the first to lovingly set the record straight. Excuses don’t fly in our family – for anyone.

        My point was, and is, this is a kindness we do for our brothers in Christ. When friends are careful to pack gluten free snacks when we’re out, or are careful to not eat gluten-filled foods in front of us, or go out of their way to actually *make* a special gluten-free treat that my children can eat, too, I am over-the-moon appreciative! Over. the. moon. There has been more than one time I have literally been moved to tears because of it. It’s just so – so kind. It wasn’t anything they had to do. And if they hadn’t done so, it would not have absolved any of us of any responsibility to eat only the gluten-free food available to us. It comes from a loving heart that seeks a brother’s or sister’s good over their own. It’s grace – God’s grace flowing through them. For *me*! For *us*! It’s a sacrifice – time, money (gluten free is costly!), energy. Taking the time to research what they can serve my children and me in a world where time is so scarce? It is a gift of sacrifice that is truly priceless to me.

        This is the giddy kind of love I wish to extend and I am teaching my children to extend to our brothers. We don’t do it because we have to. (Well, the children do, because since their children; we teach by example and set parameters and pray and pray their hearts will follow.) We do it because it’s just right to show preference to our brothers and sisters in Christ. We do it because it’s the kind of love Christ showed in laying down His life…except that *all* we’re laying down is a dress or a blouse or a skirt. They’re just *clothes*…and personal preferences. I don’t want to give up the opportunity to pour out Christ’s love and grace and mercy on anyone, especially for the sake of my personal clothing preferences.

        • http://humbled-pie.blogspot.com/ Kari

          What I failed to say above was that while there are certainly men addicted to porn in our churches, Bible studies, etc. – because the statistics are truly staggering – they are really not our family’s primary concern in this regard at all. We are more aware of those issues because of my husband’s profession, in which he reguarly counsels people with – and without – addictions.

          We are mainly thinking about the average men and teens all around us who are striving to keep their minds and hearts pure – Men and teens who have natural, *good* God given urges, and want to honor God with all of their thoughts. We do not spend all of our time focusing on addicts or addictions! Purity of heart and mind issues are a far larger and broader issue.

  • LDH

    I would say just don’t make it a NO BIKINI for the sake of NO BIKINI. I am a very tall girl, and so one pieces were decidedly less modest than some bikinis because they cut way low on top and way high over my legs. I have a larger chested friend who thought bikinis were more modest for her because they provided support and helped hold the girls in place so they weren’t jiggling all over in a one piece.

    I recall your post where you talked about the conversation of “God knows you’re wearing a thong.” Modesty is the goal, not a rules against no bikinis. I know you are dealing with an 11 year old, so these arguments probably don’t matter quite yet. But if she gets to be 6 feet tall with huge boobs, remember than one piece doesn’t mean automatically and necessarily mean modesty….

  • http://fromtheheartofjoanna.blogspot.com Jo

    Hmmm, I guess I’ve come to see this kind of differently, and it’s a topic I’ve wrestled with a lot. This is where I’m at right now: what if modesty is less a Christian/religious/purity issue and more a matter of cultural appropriateness and personal comfort/style?

    I see way more bikinis (on people of all ages and sizes) when I’m at CA and Florida beaches than the Midwest swimming pool. A friend who lived in Brazil says her American bikini was modest by comparison there, and I imagine that if I lived in the Middle East, I would gladly order up something closer to burkini. When I’m pregnant, I feel more comfortable in a tankini than my now usual bikini. A skin tight suit, whether it comes with no belly, one inch of belly, or 7 inches is pretty much the same thing in my mind.

    After much cajoling by my husband, a bikini has been my suit of choice for a while (in place of the one piece + shorts of our youth). My girls (only 8 and 5) have worn a whole variety of swimsuits – including tankinis, bikinis, and a one piece that the older one chose for comfort last summer. Yeah, it took a little time to get used to my skin and theirs showing a bit more, but really, it’s fairly normal in our culture.

    The one thing I try to model and communicate to my girls so far is that certain clothes fit certain occasions – so dress nicer and with more coverage for school than you would for the beach or mud puddle (and then pick something that looks nice on you and is comfortable). But then far more importantly than that, it’s what is coming out of our hearts that matters a lot more than what we’re wearing – no matter how many pieces it comes in or how long the hem is, maybe? Some of the most Jesus-like friends I have are dedicated bikini-wearers, so go figure…

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      Loved this comment! I think you really hit the nail on the head, here, Jo! I’ll definitely consider the bikini issue in light of the cultural appropriateness. Thanks!

  • deltaflute

    You can also talk to her about sun damage because the more skin showing the more likely you’ll burn and perhaps get skin cancer. My friend developed melanoma in her 20s because she didn’t wear sunscreen while outside in shorts and a t-shirt.

    I wear a bikini but I also wear a cover over it into the pool. Part of it is modesty and the other part of it is for the sun. I can’t really wear a one piece with a preggo belly although I know they make maternity ones. Bikini’s just fit better. Usually I wear a tankini because I found one that covers more of me then a one piece does.

    You can also point out that there are plenty of women who don’t wear bikini’s either. Take surfers, divers, or professional swimmers. They all wear something that makes it easier for them to move in the pool/ocean. A bikini comes off too easily. If she likes to jump into the pool, you may want to point out that she can easily loose her top or it can pull off her chest.

    I would make it about the bikini’s functionality than about her. Causes less rebellion if she can understand that your being practical rather than strict about the no bikini thing.

    But I also have a boy so this is less of an issue. Although he’ll probably wear a swim shirt in the pool for practical reasons. He’s fair skinned.

    • rachieannie

      Part of the swimsuit coming off is a very valid point. I dealt with that in high school (the very few times I actually jumped into the water) and it was a struggle to make sure I could get it pulled up in time, just for my own comfort’s sake.

      It doesn’t mean that I would only wear one pieces (I actually haven’t worn a one piece since I was a little girl … mostly because it’s impossible to find one that isn’t meant for a grandmother at a decent price – 2 pieces are cheaper!), but make sure that whatever kind of suit it is stays on!

  • http://lovingfromtheinsideout.blogspot.com Connie

    I’m not a parent, but I’ve been parented…and from that perspective allow me to beg of you: whatever you do, whatever decision you make, please: explain to her the “why” behind it. Perhaps you’re planning to do so in any case?…I just know from experience that when you don’t know the “why” behind a rule, sooner or later, when you start the normal questioning-of-everything-you’ve-ever-been-taught, if there isn’t a good reason for something, it can seem arbitrary and is easily kicked to the curb. Now, if the rule is overly strict/ridiculous, that’s one thing. But if you don’t grow up with any context for anything, you probably have no skills for determining the difference between the ridiculous ones and the good ones. But–you may already know all this from your own experience. Just had to speak my piece. ;)

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      Rest assured, I give plenty of explanations. :) Thanks for speaking your mind!

  • http://inspired-vintage.blogspot.com Kels

    Did you know that the first woman to wear a bikini was a nude stripper and all the fashion models that the designer (Who was the son of a lingerie designer) asked to wear it refused because it was just a bra and underwear in different fabric? I have worn a bikini and actually prefer a one piece or tankini. I have a ample bosom and so most bikinis that support me looks exactly like a bra. When i did wear a bikini i think it showed off more then my bra does. Interesting hey?

    My advice is that a tankini is appropriate becasue it still covers everything that you want to cover on your daughter… often more then some of the one pieces these days. 2 pieces are fun and make a girl feel grown up (at least it did for me).

  • KP

    I was raised in a fairly conservative religious home, but bikinis weren’t a problem. I think my first was probably at 12 or so, had a very generously cut top and boy shorts on the bottom (it was made by Nike, and designed to cover and support). I also owned and wore one-piece suits at the time; it wasn’t some rite of passage from one to the other. I find 2-piece suits, be they tankinis or bikinis, a lot easier to wear for a beach/swimming day because it’s a lot easier to use the bathroom or change clothes.

    So I think you can emphasize modesty and self-respect without outright banning bikinis. I grew up perpetually feeling different, for a variety of reasons but some of those were never having “the right” clothing (I wore a lot of old church hand-me-downs), and it was not a character-producing experience so much as something to talk about later in therapy. There is something to be said for fitting in where clothes are concerned, as long as you’re not compromising your values in order to do it. And I wish we as Christians would focus harder on becoming part of our communities and working hand in hand with those who don’t share our religious beliefs, instead of focusing on how we might stand out. Speaking solely from my own experience, being taught from such a young age that I was different and would be persecuted for my beliefs made me simultaneously anxious and prideful – not a good combination.

    When churches emphasize that women alone are responsible for purity/modesty/chastity, it teaches girls to view their bodies negatively and to feel enormous shame for the way that (at least some) men (will inevitably) treat them. There has to be a better way to talk with young women about self-respect and respect for others without teaching them that they are responsible for other people’s thoughts – because in point of fact, they’re not. We are all – men and women – responsible for the ways in which we think and act.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      Your last paragraph just NAILS it! Thanks KP!

  • http://dragonfliesandkatydids.blogspot.com/ Katy

    My best friend was, for a while, the only person I knew with a pool. The family was always very generous about inviting us over to swim during the summer. However, her mother had a “no-belly” rule which required modest swimsuits – even tshirts for the boys. I admire her stance on this, especially because my best friend had an older brother who also was allowed to invite friends over to use the pool. I think keeping the rule simple and straight-forward was for the best. It eliminated really skimpy and revealing suits, while not making things awkward or inviting limit-pushing. Now I have a two-piece, fully covering tankini (still allowed in the pool!) and find it to be much more comfortable and practical than either a one-piece or a bikini.

  • http://continuedwonder.blogspot.com annette

    we are currently having this discussion as well :) . I go with the “i do not want your sensitive tummy skin to be sunburned”…I did find some cute tankini’s that top meets bottom and allow those for at home swimming (however, they know that when they get out of the pool to jump on neighbor’s trampoline they need shorts/coverup) …then, I tell the story of how at a waterpark i nearly lost the bottom part of my bathing suit…NOT practical. So far they laugh and agree. (I came from a “the devil wears a bikini” background so I have to sort out the ridiculous extreme) So very true about the relationship being most important ☺ .

    • Donna

      Can’t say I’ve ever thought of the devil as wearing a bikini… lol!

  • Esther

    Hey I don’t mean to come off as rude but I thought you recently wrote a post on how you don’t make rules about modesty for your daughters. I stand by your logic in that post but not this one.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      I did write a post about that and it’s LINKED in the body of this post. This post is me working out the dailies of my logic–it means I’m able to think about both sides of this issue.

      • Esther

        ah yes you did. my bad. i think i skim read a lot. :)

  • http://papuagirlindallas.blogspot.com Kacie

    I grew up in Indonesia. Missionary kid in a Muslim country. Regular bathing suits were sketch over there, a bikini was unimaginable. I’ve NEVER been able to handle a bikini, and I have a hard time not wearing shorts and a tank top over a regular suit.

    However, except for some very conservative girls, most Christian kids (good ones too) in the US really are used to bikinis. It is socially acceptable. And, because I really do believe that modesty standards are partly cultural (I mean, I also grew up partly in Papua and the women don’t wear shirts. What’s modest in that culture?), I can’t fully condemn it.

    I just know that I can’t handle it. To me, it is underwear. Tankinis are a great way to go. They aren’t one pieces so they look more in style, but sometimes they are even more modest than one pieces!

    One thing is… those little girls all the way through high school just will not get what the guys see when they see girls in bikinis. They’ll think it’s no big deal. They truly don’t know. They think it’s about modesty as a woman, and I’d say a lot of it is about protecting girls from the eyes of men. Sometimes that’s a great chance for Daddy to step in and talk about how he’s going to set standards about what’s okay with his daughter wearing as a man..who knows what guys think.

  • ec

    I’m another non-parent but I’ve thought a bit about matters of modesty, so here are my rambling two cents. I absolutely agree that eleven years old is too young for a bikini. Whatever anyone’s opinion on the modesty/immodesty of a bikinis, I think it’s pretty clear that they are, like cocktail dresses and very high heels, (adult) women’s clothes. And 11 years old is not yet an (adult) woman. That said, perhaps you need to answer the question if there is an age (well, before 96 ;) )when you would allow a two-piece suit, before you talk to your daughter.

    That said, I have mixed feelings on swimsuits/modesty. My parents are converts to Catholicism and they kind of swung from one end to the other on the swimsuit issue when I was growing up- although not in the order you might expect. They were also pretty good about emphasizing the need for modesty, but they didn’t give me much guidance on the reasons for being modest and what sort of clothing was modest.

    The first bikini I ever owned, my mom brought home for me from a visit to Hawaii (where she grew up and where they were normal swimwear) when I was around10 years old, I think. My poor mom! Like so many things she offered me at that age, I disdained it. It had triangles on top! Eeww! (Actually, looking back, it was really cute- maybe not appropriate – but cute.)

    When I hit the teenage years, my mom was no longer in favor of bikinis, although she never out and out forbade them. At that same time, I was finding that most one-piece suits weren’t modest enough for me, either (especially in terms of back/butt coverage.) So I ended up choosing two piece suits made up of boy shorts and a bandeau top. My mom grumbled at me bit about my choices, but didn’t outlaw them, so between what I chose and takinis which my sisters tended to choose, that’s where the question landed in my house.

    Like a lot of other commenters here, I think that tankinis are a reasonable compromise – they are two pieces and so closer to “the style” and to blending in with the other kids – but more modest and not an invitation for anyone to ogle your sweet daughter.

    Maybe it would be possible to talk to your daughter about swimsuits/modesty a way that emphasizes that learning to balance respect for herself (by trying not to treat her body as merely something for other people to stare at) while still choosing clothes that are stylish and express her own taste is part of growing up into a (Christian) woman (????)

    (Or maybe that whole sentence is just terminally lame. I am actually petrified to have a pre-teen/teenage daughter of my own – you have my greatest respect!)

  • http://www.rareroses.com/ Azure

    I guess I lucked out. My 8-year-old does not want to wear a bikini. We were over at my sister’s house when all the cousins started heading into the pool. I told her she could wear her samed aged cousin’s extra bikini if she wanted to swim. She refused. She also doesn’t like doing “sassy” dancing. It has nothing do do with my parenting; I think it’s that she is inherently shy and easily embarrassed. Too bad some girls are currently making fun of her because she always wears dresses to school. What’s wrong with dresses?!

  • http://rebekah-outnumbered@blogspot.com Rebekah

    I was 20 when I purchased my first bikini, with my own money, and my boyfriend helped me pick it out! Wow, that sounds bad. That boyfriend is now my husband of 12 years. I wish I had had swimsuit options as a young girl because of my body type. I have a very long torso and so one pieces look really bad and a bit inappropriate. There is a lot of pulling and stretching going on in a one piece for me. I love the tank options that they have now. 11 seems really young for a skanky two piece, but a modest tank type would seem an appropriate compromise.

    I wore binkins for much of my 20′s. But then I hit my 30′s a became a mother and it all seemed a bit conflicting. So, I am loving my boy shorts and tank tops.
    Oh and 96 was the age my father said I could get my ear’s pierced. I almost wanted them pierced at 13, but that desire quickly faded and I am 33 and still no holes in my ears…totally my choice. My sister got hers pierced as soon as she left the house.

    Last random thought: we don’t use the words gosh or gees in our house. My grandparents were Quakers who respected the name of God and did not take it lightly. My boys hear everyone use these words, even the pastor of our church…along with all the other people we respect for the way they are living their life. They know that these words don’t make us better or others worse for use, but it just something that makes our family different and is a family expectation. So far it is working. Keeping the tradition alive.

  • http://www.sadiemotta.typepad.com JoAnn

    this might get lost with 54 comments! woah! Beth wanted a bikini this year….I got one for her…..AND a matching rash guard, cuz, my kid never sees the sun without a rash guard ;) Happy mom, Happy kid, covered belly…..think about that one, sista’ !

  • http://www.hopefulleigh.blogspot.com HopefulLeigh

    I was not allowed to wear a bikini growing up. My parents’ logic, specifically my dad’s was related to what guys might think if they saw me flashing skin. I respected my parents, though I didn’t completely understand but I did follow their guidelines. Now years later, I’m not 100% comfortable with that line of thinking, as this puts too much responsibility on a woman for a man’s self-control. Yes, it’s wise to think about what you’re wearing but guys need to own up to their response. That said, my parents told me once I was 18 I could decide for myself and so I finally wore my first bikini at 18. It’s fitting that I’m all about the one-piece now!

  • Katie

    Sigh. Modesty is so hard. I might be wrong, but I’m starting to think that while the principles behind modesty are objective, the practical application is more or less subjective. I guess in a case like this, I would discuss modesty with my daughter, stressing the fact that I want her to dress in a way that reflects her dignity and self-worth. From there, I would decide what the rules were for my family – and that could mean yes or no to the bikini. I personally go the tankini-that-looks-like-a-one-piece route, but I have a friend who write articles on modesty and has no problem wearing a bikini. Same principles, different practical application.

    Regarding the “would you feel comfortable wearing your underwear in the grocery store?” argument: No, but I also wouldn’t feel comfortable wearing a one-piece bathing suit in the grocery store. If I followed this line of thinking, I would need to wear one of those Victorian striped numbers. Different sorts of clothing are appropriate in different circumstances.

    Finally, my personal experience. My sisters and I (now 25, 23, and 18 respectively) were not allowed to wear bikinis. I, the stereotypically obedient eldest, never pushed the issue. The second sister didn’t make a big deal out of it, but she did buy a bikini the summer she was 18 and she now alternates between various sorts of bathing suits (she’s pretty sporty, so a bikini isn’t the most practical choice). My youngest sister (the family drama queen :) did make a big deal out of it once, but the issue passed and now she wears tankinis or one-pieces by choice. We were not the only girls in our respective groups of friends who weren’t allowed to wear bikinis, and that helped a lot.

  • Elizabeth

    I guess the only thing I can say in terms of what you end up telling your daughter is just be confident in your decision and make it out of love for her and her dignity as a person, as a human being. No matter what anyone says about women being or not being responsible for men’s thoughts, we are responsible for being strong in our belief as Christians that we were made in the image and likeness of God. So hopefully, whatever you decide for her will help to validate that fact. No matter what kind of bathing suit she’s wearing.

  • Valerie

    I have a vague memory of a post of your done aaaages ago where you wrote down things that you were glad your mother did, or you thanked her for doing. I seem to remember saying you were thankful she never let you wear a bikini? It really stuck with me because I thought it so precious that you were, in hindsight, grateful that she forbade you this… I could be wrong, though! Was it you who wrote this?

    Anyway, I come from a hot state in a hot country where I am sure standards of modesty are pretty relaxed. Heaps of people wear bikinis. I don’t think I’d let our girlie wear one (and her daddy definately won’t! lol!) because I don’t want her to be ogled, and I don’t want her getting skin cancer. No brainer for me.

    I wear a tankini, works for me. Might be a good compromise?

    Valerie

    I must also find you the BEST ad relating to bathers/undies. BRB.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      Yep. That was me! Wow, you have a great memory. And I still AM thankful for that. :)

      • Valerie

        My memory is strange! How can I remember that but can’t remember the things I plan to do the next day!? LOL! Bad case of baby brain…

  • Valerie

    THis is originally an Aussie ad but they have dubbed it calling bathers, ‘togs’.

    http://icecreamcommercial.com/togs-or-undies-trumpet-ice-cream-commercial/

    • Katy-Anne

      Swimsuits are called togs in the part of Australia I grew up in. In fact, I never called them anything else until I moved to America and found out nobody had a clue what “togs” were.

      • Valerie

        Eastern States? In WA we call them bathers! :)

        • Katy-Anne

          Queensland at least calls them “togs”. I think in NSW too.

          • http://fivebrothersonesister.blogspot.com Deanne

            In NSW we call them swimmers.

  • Mamalion

    Wow, lots of differing opinions here. With grace, I’ll share what we’ve done. I have 3 dds, 19, 18, and 10 (and 3 sons too). When they were little we bought whatever suit didn’t have triangles at the top, and covered the midriff to some extent. I never made much of an issue of completely covering the tummy, but we don’t make too much of an issue of covering up nudity in the house either. I bought suits that looked cute. I vaguely remember some with boy shorts and tankish tops. They all had 1-piece suits too.

    That said, I’ve been a lifeguard (in my former life) and taught swim lessons for 20+ years, so my kids live at the pool in the summer. There are different places for different types of suits. When you are going down the water slides, you want a 1-piece suit, or you’re likely to wind up with your cute bikini top around your ears. Team racing needs a 1-piece. When you’re guarding all day, by the end of the day, from a purely practical point, you want more coverage, so you add shorts.

    When my older girls, who now work at the pools as lifeguards/WSIs, start work next week, they will wear old 1-piece suits, since they’ll be getting in the nasty water to scrub, etc. When they guard, they wear either tankinis or 1 piece suits also, since the bikini suits required for them are in our (theirs also!) opinion, too small. But the other issue we run into is that even if we choose the more modest swimsuits, they still have ‘Guard’ plastered across their chests. So much for modesty. And this is a required uniform. They also wear the board shorts with their suits.

    I think the big issue, which your husband hit right on the head, is living in relationship with them, so you can talk openly to them. When they started caring about clothing, we put a standard in place- we called it the Hallelujah test. If you put your hands over your head, and I see skin, or you bend down, touch your toes, and have to adjust anything when you come back up, whatever you have on is too tight. This applies broadly to both the boys and the girls. It eliminates me having to make judgement calls on their clothing. I also pushed the point that they needed to be comfortable in their clothing. The other thing is to ask them what they think about the item. I’ll say ‘I think it pulls across the bust. What do you think?’ If you treat them like their opinion matters, you’re less likely to get into a standoff.

    And please, please, have those tough conversations with your kids! My dd is at a Christian college, and says she and one other girl are the only ones with good sexual information. Yes, it was uncomfortable, but it also gave me more credibility to make the call on their less-modest clothing, because they had the information to make good decisions. And it ensures that my kids think they can talk to me about anything. We don’t discuss personal details about our relationship, but speak in general terms for sure.

    I do have to laugh at one of my friend’s comments- she’s one of the most modest women I know, and her point is “If we can tell your bra size, your shirt’s too tight!”

  • Maggie Dee

    Well, I don’t have too much to add except according to my teenage son, one piece suits are more attractive. He’s says bikinis just look like bra and underwear but one piece, vintage type highlight a body better.

    I too think it’s cultural. There is appropriate clothing for different events/places. What’s considered appropriate where I live may/may not be considered appropriate in another city/state/country.

  • steph

    I grew up on the swim team and wore Speedo one-pieces year round. As I matured, though, I found I needed a bit more support on the top, which one piece competition suits don’t provide. I tried buying different suits in college but never really found anything that worked for me.
    Last year I invented my own swimsuit. I bought a sports bra with cups, a swim skirt I really liked, and a sleeveless jogging top from the exercise section at Kohls. I’ve been really pleased with it so far; I might look for more modest shorts/skirt for the bottom, because *I* would feel more comfortable, not because it has to be modest. I’ve loved the bra/top combination; I finally feel like I have enough support!
    Perhaps you could discuss it from a practical view. I think a lot of people have already said this, but I’ll add my opinion. Talk about what you can/can’t do in a bikini/two piece/ one piece. What does she like to do at the pool? What swimsuit is best suited for those activities?

    Hope it goes well!

    • Katy-Anne

      Ok I must be misunderstanding here, I really hope I am. I’m Australian, and to me, a speedo is boys swimsuits, just the underwear part with nothing else. Are speedos different in the USA?

      • Em

        Speedo is also a brand of swimsuit, often used in competitive swimming.

      • Lindsey

        Speedo is a brand, and they make racing suits for girls, too. From what I’ve seen, they are all sporty and have full coverage (but I guess not great boob support).

  • Byrde

    My anti bikini stand has less to do with the revealing aspect, as there are more and less revealing bikinis–and one pieces (use to lifeguard–all to familiar with this fact), and more to do with the purpose. If you want to swim, bikinis are rotten because you always have to worry about slippage. If you want a comfortable and modest maybe-in-the-pool but mostly lounging in the sun swimwear, I’d go tankini.
    As for the modesty conversation, part of the trick is also not making sexuality something to be ashamed of, but something to make sure everyone, especially yourself, is respecting.
    Goodluck!

  • http://beinhome.blogspot.com/ Beth

    Elizabeth,

    This is a toughie for me. I actually think tanks, spagetti straps, 2 piece bathing suits, halter tops ARE for little girls. When I was a little girl kids were not sexualized and objectified the way they are now. I think all those articles of clothing are scarier when they’re on 15, 16, 17 year old girls because they have usually developed. I think it’s perfectly normal for a 16 yo to wear a bikini to a swimming pool but the problem is, they wear them everywhere BUT the beach or swimming pool. That’s all. This is a great topic. I always thought 2 piece bathing suits were so uncomfortable and since I had nothing up top, they slid all over the place. Besides that, I’m white as a ghost and had no business exposing my skin that way.

  • Elizabeth

    I grew up in a very, very conservative Christian community and wore knee length, cotton bloomers for swimming. Awful and hazardous! When I became Catholic, I carried with me a lot of the body shame and insecurity from my growing up years. I entered puberty dreadfully afraid of leading some man astray and wore ankle length skirts and very loose t-shirts to cover my figure.

    I met my best friend and now husband in college who began the long work of undoing all the gnosticism and scrupulosity I had learned as a child. He taught me that the body is sacred and holy, beautiful in its totality…that modesty has everything to do with relationship and situation, and very little to do with clothing. He also taught me that men are responsible for their own souls and choices.

    I have bikinis and tankinis. This summer I will probably opt for the bikini since I’m pregnant and nothing else is particularly practical. When we talk to our children about modesty, it will be in the context of relationship not particular clothing styles.

  • http://flourishingmother.blogspot.com Andrea@FlourishingMother

    I have three daughters. my oldest is 17. so i’ve had a little experience with this. *wry smile* it’s not fun AT ALL. i will say that. I do not allow bikinis for my younger girls. (and for the record, 11 is too young imo) you must set those limits for as long as you can. Now my oldest is 17. we set the same limits and talked ad nauseam about modesty. let’s face it, sometimes they just don’t *get* that. it takes time and maturity for them to understand that they need to be cautious of their body. My daughter is 17 and very very mature and modest, but she still looks stylish and still gives extra though in how she presents herself but yet she *still does not completely get it*. so there will be fights and arguements and conversations that might not always go the way you want them to, and vice versa, but the main thing is to just keep the conversation going, have some basic guidelines without being overly strict. For example i let my 10 and 9 year old girls wear modest tankinis, but i would never let them wear a skimpy bikini. my 17 year old wears a bikini, but it has coverage and is also not skimpy. (such a fine line, that even I have to toe the line sometimes and give more on my part for the sake of our relationship) I will say now after all these years of bathing suit shopping with my oldest, I am proud of her choices and the way she dresses herself without my guidance. and we are still friends!

  • http://www.indiatoappleton.blogspot.com Nancy

    A lot of it depends on the suit, I’d say. Skimpy, sexy-looking suits on little girls creep me out — but I don’t want to see them on teenagers either. There are plenty of 2-piece sporty suits that cover more.

    I think the thing to do with my daughters is ask them WHY they like a particular suit. Sometimes their answer is, “Because it has flowers on it.” At younger ages, they don’t have the same criteria as I do — which is also why it’s my job to steer them toward more appropriate suits that also happen to have flowers. :)

    As for my sons — I hope we’re teaching them to see girls as people made in the image of God, no matter what the girls are wearing. But I do wish grown women would cover their cleavage a bit more (in non-beach situations — yikes).

  • Maryann

    I know a parent who doesn’t let her daughter wear a bikini at the beach, but she lets her wear mini-skirts and tank tops to school. I think Moms have it hard, trying to figure all this out.

    I don’t have kids, but even when I didn’t care about modesty, I didn’t feel thin enough to wear a bikini myself. (I wasn’t overweight by any standards, but all my friends were thinner, taller and tanner. I felt like a white blob in comparison, blinding the dolphins with my fluorescent flabbiness. But body image issues are probably covered in your other posts…)

    As someone who is 44, I notice that beachwear isn’t necessarily less modest. The bigger change is that what used to pass as beachwear and/or undergarments is now seen in supermarkets, at jobs and even at church. For example, those form-fitting spaghetti strap tanks tops used to be called camisoles and you just wore them under your shirt. Even during the days of Madonna, you wouldn’t wear those tops to the mall or work, just to a club or party. I’m not saying our standards right or wrong; we also wore acid-washed jeans, so we weren’t experts on fashion.

    Then there’s flip flops. They used to be what you’d wear to the beach, around the house or in the grungy shower at the gym. Now people wear them to work. Even guys wear them. In the eighties, if a guy wore flip flops, he might as well have been wearing bunny slippers, it would have been seen as that unusual.

    By the way, I wear flip flops out of the house too, I’m just commenting on how quickly things have changed, and I’m not even that old. (I don’t do the spaghetti strap tanks, because they tend to be clingy and low-cut, and I’m a 34C. It would just make me too self-conscious.)

    I guess I sound like an old lady…in my day, you walked ten miles to school in the snow without flip flops or tank tops and you liked it! Or something like that…

    I don’t have any answers, but I do think it’s not just a cultural thing, but a generational thing too. Another factor is that, if you just look around, girls in general seem to be physically maturing much faster than they used to, which means moms have to prepare for these conversations earlier. I give you a lot of credit, it can’t be easy.

  • Marla Lynch

    I think it depends on the bikini and on the motivations of the one wearing it. I have worn bikinis as a child, teenager, and adult. But, I always chose the more modest ones, and it was never about baiting guys.

  • Meg

    I have been thinking a lot about this thread recently. It is sad that an issue like modesty divides fellow Christians. But sin will always be around right? I understand those that don’t want girls to get a negative image of their bodies, that’s not right. We were created in the image and likeness of God after all. I think that is the best way to approach modesty- does this outfit proclaim to all the world that you are a daughter of God?? Look at the focal point of the shirt or the swimsuit- what is it designed to draw the eyes to? Because one part of our bodies does not represent the whole person. We have a saying in our house that if I don’t like an outfit in the store that is asked for I just say “I don’t think that outfit understands the truth and dignity of the human person.” And then we come home and talk about what that means. My kids are little still- 9, 7, and younger. But that’s a better way to go than saying “No, that little miniskirt and tube top make you look like a hooker.” As girls and boys turn into young women and men and start to “get” more of the facts of life I think it is appropriate to clue them into the fact that men and women have different struggles against sin. Thus, men need to use coustody of the eyes and girls need to be mindful of their outfits (a lot more goes into chastity too!). I would also explain to my daughters, like my mom did, that for men trying to live chastity clothes that emphasize the parts of the body that are most arousing can be uncharitable. Does that mean that men get off the hook for lustful thoughts? HELL NO. I just think it is grossly unfair to answer the comments about helping men out with “EWWW…guys shouldn’t be perverts.” If only it was that easy. We’re all struggling with sin- just with different types. That’s my 2 cents after a bit more reflection.

  • Jen

    Here in Maine, we have really hot days in the summer, but really cold water in the ocean, lakes and rivers. I find the best outfit to wear when going to the water is a pair of quick drying shorts, and a tank top with wide straps … the cotton ones that guys wear are thin enough to provide quick drying and if not white, provide enough coverage to be comfortable for me. These items are generally worn over regular underclothes … by the time I get home I’m dry and ready to shower to remove the sand … oh well.

    As for bikinis, my folks didn’t express an opinion one way or the other. I knew that they didn’t want me to get hurt or anything, but I was never taught that my clothes made me a target. In fact, my folks were very adamant about that … especially my mom. I did, though, usually go clothing shopping with her and if she didn’t like something, I didn’t get it. It was their money paying for the clothes, not mine, so yeah… I did have one that was red terry cloth as a young child and a pink and orange polyester (?) one as a teen … I was heavy as a teen and didn’t feel good wearing it in public. Oh well.

  • Margaret

    There are actually some very modest tankinis, particularly the ones with boy shorts or skirted bottoms.

    I think a person can meld appreciation for a beautiful God-made body with covering it up for the sake of modesty. It doesn’t have to be about shame. It can be about how you use that gift of your beautiful body, what you say with it, and who you choose to reveal it to.

    My body issues had nothing to do with modesty, though I grew up in and around groups that were pretty strict about it. The person who changed my attitude towards myself was my husband. And I didn’t need to change my mode of dress or wear a bikini in public. I needed to hear “You are beautiful” from the one who saw me at my most vulnerable and at my worst and consistently demonstrated his appreciation for me, all of me, including my fat, flawed body every day that we’ve been married.

    Your husband is right, it is about relationship. Whether you allow bikinis or ban them, your daughter’s feelings about herself aren’t going to rise from your restrictions or leniencies.

  • Pingback: THE SATURDAY EVENING BLOG POST, vol. 3, issue 5 | Elizabeth Esther

  • Susan

    Ladies, it would be good to read this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/4636689/Men-really-do-see-half-naked-women-as-objects-scientists-claim.html

    I think the lesson I want to take away from the study is that seeing a woman “half naked” makes it difficult for a man to see the person. Instead, he sees an “object.” We use objects; we don’t love them. Since none of us want to be used – we want to be loved, respected, seen as a person – perhaps we should keep this study in mind when we choose out swimsuits or any other attire.

  • Lex

    Honestly? I don’t really seem what the problem with bikinis is. I mean, obviously if your daughter doesn’t have “anything up top”, she shouldn’t be wearing it. It just looks awkward. And the bikini should not make your child look like she might as well be skinny dipping. One pieces are really quite unflattering to a girls the ages of twelve and above, and that can cause plenty of issues later. They can develop a nasty lack of self esteem if they’re unlucky. In my opinion, you shouldn’t care so much about the belly. Really, what’s sexual about someone’s abdomen?
    So I make sure their tops don’t show cleavage and don’t look like they might have a little slip sometime, and I make sure their bottoms are anything but a bikini bottom. They can wear shorts instead, which have more coverage than a one piece, and, in my opinion, are much more flattering than a bikini bottom anyway. Why worry about coverage in non-sexual places and not in the most sexual place on their body? So don’t let them wear skimpy swimwear, but let them wear something flattering. Which is most assuredly NOT a one piece.