How the pornification of marriage hurts real people

I thought we had an interesting conversation yesterday about the Pornification of Marriage. Thanks to all who participated. I was heartbroken, inspired and thankful for many of the exquisite insights. I wanted to highlight a few of those (because sometimes important insights get buried in the avalanche of comments):

from kd:

One of the reasons my first marriage failed is because my ex-husband expected me to be beyond Christian in the bedroom. Because I would not engage in pornified sexual acts, I was no longer attractive, submissive or considered a good Christian wife. Sex is meant to be a love act. Not a fulfillment of lust. If I thought that the idea of pole dancing came to an innocent couple who had never heard nor seen of the idea elsewhere, it wouldn’t bother me. But the fact that most likely any such ideas have come from one or both spouses having dabbled in ungodly, worldly sexual ideas before they were married causes me to wonder.

from Joi:

It seems to me that mainstream Christian culture has taken secular society’s ideas about sex and simply slapped a “wait until marriage” sticker on it without addressing any deeper problems. As someone who has decided to pursue a life of permanent singleness, I’ve found that a lot of Christians simply can’t process the fact that a life without sex is not only an option, but can be very fulfilling as well. We’ve become so saturated with secular ideas about sex that we’ve become blinded to many things that we used to know.

from Holly (married 22 years, nine kiddos!):

Although sex is a wonderful gift there’s just so much more to a good marriage. I loved Joi’s comment above. Such insight and truth! My husband went thru a devastating illness last year – sex suddenly wasn’t really all that important. Getting him well again was. Providing stability for our children was. Loving each other, serving each other – that was what was important. Sex was the icing – not the main course of our lives. If we were to never be physical again, it would be a horrible loss, but we would still have each other and our love would still be incredible and worthy. I feel like even in church circles these days there is way too much focus on providing “Sizzling sex.” Well….when it is, it is. :) When it’s not, it’s still pretty amazing – a real gift to each other. There is so much more to do in this life, really, so much more to the kingdom of God. (And that’s not to set me up as super holy. I’m not.) I just feel that we need to reprioritize a bit, and not clamor for the same thing that the world clamors for – at least not in the same way. :) My thoughts are that we are to enjoy that part of our marriage – then move on with the rest of the day and see what God has for us to be doing.

from Nancy:

A lot of the reasons I object to the idea of pole dancing in a Christian relationship can be found in the “why?” of it. *Why* does a man think it’s sexy? Because he’s seen it on TV, or in a movie, or in a strip club? I want my husband to think I’m sexy not because I imitate sex workers, but because he loves me — there are plenty of nuances, creativity and fun to explore with each other without imitating porn.

from Callie:

This summer, my good Christian friend got married, guess what her idea of a great bachelorette party is? Yes, pole dancing lessons. I struggled with this as I am passionate about human trafficking and prostitution issues and desire to see a shift in our society’s view of sex. How can I justify going to my friend’s bachelorette and learning to pole dance? That’s the very thing I speak out on.

I have been struggling with the question as to WHY Christian women believe it is alright to learn how to pole dance? (well, women in general and especially Christian women) I told my friend I didn’t want to go, she said “It’s not that big of a deal, it’s fun, it’s at a recreational place, we all just want to learn how to be sexy for our husbands.” I have a problem with that last part. As women, we don’t need to LEARN how to be sexy, we ARE sexy and we already know how to be sexy. I was appalled that all these Christian women (and their parents) were so accepting of pole dancing. I will admit, I went to that pole dancing lesson, I didn’t want to let my friend down and fell into peer pressure. I am not proud of it. I did not have fun, I felt like a robot and I felt incredibly awkward. Now, I firmly believe that we should not be bringing elements of prostitution and sexual exploitation into our marriage beds. Pole dancing is a spectacle, objectifying women. Why would I want to learn how to dance like a stripper and place myself as a spectacle? Why would I want a husband who finds that attractive? I want a husband who respects me and finds me attractive no matter what I wear or do.

from Tara S:

It seems that there is endless harm to be done in the “anything goes” mentality. The idea that if we can just wait…just wait until marriage and then all our carnal fantasies can come true! It doesn’t do much to promote actual chastity, which is why so many of us seem to think that a life without sex is some kind of unimaginable deprivation…

In my own youth, I was surrounded by the idea that thinking about sex, fantasizing, etc, etc, was perfectly healthy….period. There was no caution toward restraint whatsoever. This kind of coaching did not do me any favors. I built up a pattern of thought and internal lusting in those years (because it’s all in my head, it doesn’t count, right?) that I’m still struggling to set right today. I can’t help but draw a parallel with the “It’s all in my marriage, it doesn’t count, right?” ….I am, by experience and necessity, very wary of that train of thought.

Chastity is humble restraint in thought, word, and deed. If we are just waiting for marriage to get our “get out of jail free card,” then is it really chastity?

from Chuck:

I work as a psychotherapist, primarily in the Christian community (but don’t call me a “christian counselor” – there’s no such thing, IMHO), and primarily with issues of sexual integrity (like porn addiction).

I completely agree with you about the pornification of marriage. In fact, I’ll even take things a bit further by saying publicly here something I’ve often said privately elsewhere…

Porn for a man is (imagined) sex with a woman who will not or cannot say “no”. There is no emotional risk involved, and no expectations on him for any kind of relationship. In short, it’s sexual violence. Porn for a woman is (again, imagined) sex with a man who will not or cannot fail her relationally. He will always be “romantic” and “make” her feel special (like anybody can actually force somebody to feel anything??) It’s not love, because there is no risk.

So what do we do in most of our “Christian” marriage conferences and seminars? (BTW, I HATE using the word Christian as an adjective – that’s why it’s in quotes – but that’s a whole other deal…) I those conferences, men are told to be more romantic, get out the candles and the soft music, send cards, make her feel special. Women are told to be more sexually available and assertive, “give him your body,” and for heaven’s sake, NEVER say “no.” In short (using my definitions above): be more like porn for each other.

How in GOD’s holy name (and I mean this prayerfully!) does that honor His image and likeness, in which we are made? How does it invite us to think about sexual union being one of the highest forms of worship that humans are capable of? “Two becoming one in the presence of God” is, IMHO, the closest we can come to experiencing, celebrating, and yes, worshipping Trinity. Our loving, relational GOD.

Related: h/t Emerging Mummy“Let’s Talk about Sex, Baby (…and consumerism)”

This entry was posted in Love/Sex Advice. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.darcysheartstirrings.blogspot.com Darcy

    I have to be honest, I’ve been really disappointed in these last two posts. Normally I LOVE what you say here on this blog. But this….this saddens me. You’ve just taken what should be fun and glorious and slapped “Christian” and “Non-Christian” to it. You’ve taken personal preferences and made them the rule by which all couples should live. And if they don’t, you’ve declared them “unchaste” and “worldly”. That’s legalism at it’s finest. You talk here like Satan and the porn industry invented sexual pleasure, and we as Christians should do everything to make sure our relationships look as different as possible. You obviously have strong preferences when it come to what is acceptable and what is not between couples. Which is fine. But taking your preferences and declaring them to be true for everyone is not fine. Your sex is not more holy or acceptable to God than mine because you won’t dance or strip for your husband. This is the message I have gained from your posts.

    Something really stuck out to me in one of the comments above:
    “As women, we don’t need to LEARN how to be sexy, we ARE sexy and we already know how to be sexy. ”

    The thing is, in our culture, and expecially in the conservative sub-culture that we grew up in, we HAVE had to learn to be sexy. Not because we weren’t sexy to begin with, but because we repressed that, stuffed it, and slapped the “sin” label on it, declaring ourselves “set apart” from the world. So we have to learn how to be free and let the sexy out and enjoy our sexuality, enjoy the way God made us to give pleasure to our spouse. Which is a process I’ve loved discovering! I have so loved letting my sexy out for my husband, learning how to let myself BE sexy and enjoy it. I’ve enjoyed the freedom of marriage to a man that, yes, loves my body, but loves my heart more. But for many of us, it’s been a long journey toward not feeling guilty for having fun in our marriage relationship.

    I’m a feminist and egalitarian. And I have no problem stripping or whatever for my husband. He’s never asked that of me, I just give it to him because we both love it. I’ve never been “objectified”, by him, not once. I think you all would do well to not judge others so harshly for having different tastes than you. And not declaring “wrong” what God has never declared so.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      I’m sorry to disappoint you but I can respect that we have a difference of opinion on this, Darcy. You made it pretty clear yesterday that you strongly disagreed. Thank you for the time you’ve spent reading here and commenting. I appreciate you.

      • http://www.darcysheartstirrings.blogspot.com Darcy

        I appreciate you too, EE. :)

    • http://www.ayoungmomsmusings.blogspot.com Young Mom

      Ditto Darcy. I have no idea why you’ve been so judgemental about other peoples sex lives lately. And I don’t even like to pole dance. I think that the idea of wifely submission has harmed marraige and real people far more than any dancing or playing around in the bedroom.

    • http://www.seekingfaithfulnessblog.blogspot.com Holly

      You are not wrong to enjoy your married life, Darcy. Not at all. I’m not sure we are talking about exactly the same things. What I think is obnoxious are the classes and the group mentality – not what one couple comes to on their own. I do think we must always be careful that we are not being influenced by some hidden or past (or present) pornographic influence.

      God bless you and your marriage.

    • Tara S

      I guess I don’t understand the whole “morality-discussion-as-big-scary-monster” thing. In my mind, it’s analogous to physical fitness. I want to be the best person I can. I know I’m weak, so I take up a regimen, a way of life that will help me. Health nuts often go around saying that we should all stop eating gluten and start running 5 miles a day. Nobody gets offended, they just realize that these people have a good system for health that they want to share.

      We don’t generally get angry at people who have blogs talking about the dangers of refined sugar. Doesn’t mean we’ll all stop eating it, but it’s good to have that perspective out there, speaking against the tide of general public (in many cases unconsidered and uninformed) opinion. And in many cases, they are quite right. We would be better off if we stopped eating refined sugar and processed food and artificial ingredients. But we feel “healthy enough” as we are, or feel that we only need a few health improvements, and that’s fine. I sat down and ate a whole bag of Lays chips a few weeks ago, but I’m still pretty healthy in my eating and lifestyle, and I don’t feel I have any reason to feel bad about myself, physically.

      These health nut people are speaking from their hearts, on a journey. I think EE is the same, on a difficult personal spiritual journey where she is not content with half-measures for herself, and that is the place she speaks from. For those of us who are on a similar type of journey, it’s inexpressibly helpful to have this voice out here, speaking against the tide.

      • http://www.ayoungmomsmusings.blogspot.com Young Mom

        Tara S- I think there is a difference with writing a post saying that you had a problem, and when you changed your mentality it really helped you. It’s when you go to the next level and say that everyone else should feel, think and act the same way that you do about the topid. That’s when it gets legalistic.

        • Tara S

          I’m just not convinced. Sometimes it seems like we are all so wounded by the truly judgmental and unloving behaviour of some groups/individuals, that any opinion expressed in favour of *not* doing x, y, or z, is automatically seen as legalistic and unkind, unless it is couched in “this only applies to me, everybody should do what they want” language. And to me, that entryway to moral relativism is even *more* of a danger to people trying to follow Christ in this world.

          You can be a good person without taking the hardest and narrowest paths. Yes. But it is important to have people pointing those paths out, in case anybody is interested.

          • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

            Thanks, Tara. My goal, here, is to point out the ways in which porn has infiltrated Christian thought and behavior. Porn has been so normalized in our society. I suppose many might think I’m being judgmental. Mostly, I’m just coming to terms with how I, too, have adopted certain self-centered attitudes about sexuality. Thanks for all your comments on these posts–your insights have been so helpful to me!!

          • Tara S

            *MY* insights! Holy Hannah. You have no idea how much your and Jennifer Fulwiler’s blogs, and the discussion that goes on in them, has helped me in the last few years.

          • http://nicholasmyra.blogspot.com Nicholas

            Tara and Elizabeth: You guys are right. Christians before the 20th Century agree with you. Don’t worry. :P

            There is a whole lot of “it’s just the body, X is what really matters” Manichean nonsense in these comments. Arsenic isn’t poisonous because we consider it immoral, and certain acts aren’t destructive just because we judge them to be. They are destructive objectively.

        • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

          Dear Young Mom: thank you for sharing your thoughts. I truly can understand your frustration with me. I know that you and I come from similar backgrounds and so we are extra sensitive to Christians making rules for others. Please forgive me if you thought I was trying to say that EVERYONE should feel, think and act the way I do. That was not my intent at all. I’ve been in the midst of a challenging spiritual journey and am re-examining all areas of my life. I do believe that porn addiction is a serious problem within the Christian community and that’s why I’m talking about it. Thank you for continuing to read and share your thoughts. I appreciate you–even when you get all irritated and grumpy with me. :) much love, EE.

          • Tina B

            Don’t agree with everything…or a lot of things. loved this quote, “Porn for a woman is (again, imagined) sex with a man who will not or cannot fail her relationally. He will always be “romantic” and “make” her feel special (like anybody can actually force somebody to feel anything??) It’s not love, because there is no risk.” I think maybe next you should talk about the evils of Christian Romance Novels….I’m sure they have ruined their fair share of marriages(totally serious). I am glad to hear you clarify that we can have a difference of opinion without the danger of hellfire!

      • Angeline

        Yes, Tara. Exactly.

        The problem I see with discourse is that humanity is just not capable of it. We have agendas and baggage out the ying yang and can not hear or consider another viewpoint or else we feel threatened and judged. The fundamentalists cover their ears and yell “ungodly” and the reactionists cry “legalism” and a whole lot of dialogue is missed. EE, I’ve appreciated this discussion you started — that doesn’t mean that I agree with you 100% but I don’t feel judged or offended by you either. I work in family law and this subject seems to often play a part in divorce — even in “secular” marriages. I also immensely
        appreciated the thoughts shared by the “Christian” psychotherapist — although it’s not as bad as being called a “Christian” attorney.

      • Tara S

        Annnnd, I’m back. I know, right? Shaddup already, Tara! I got that sinking feeling from my comments yesterday which is a sure sign that I’ve probably accidentally put the wrong spin on my thoughts. I think I came across as saying that people who feel hurt by the discussion going forward are somehow less spiritual or what-have-you. NO NO NO, I did not mean that AT ALL!! I think we’re ALL on our own very personal and difficult journies, which is what draws us to this blog in the first place. What I meant to express is, that since this is undoubtedly the case, it can be counterproductive to too quickly label an opinion as “legalistic” which may in fact be an important insight for many. And that there are so many important things left unsaid by the Christian community for fear of the evils of unnecessary social repression, that the opposite evil, permissiveness (which can and does do as much damage, believe me) can be overlooked. I just wish we could somehow see both those perils equally, hold them both in our minds as an almost unreconcileable source of tension which is not the less true for being so difficult to make sense of. I think if we could do this, it would be easier to take opinions that are different from ours, but given in a good spirit, as just that….part of the discourse of a bunch of fallible people trying make sense of all this.

  • KatR

    Reading the comments, I think the issue is boundaries – the need to set them and the need to respect them. If women are doing things they are uncomfortable with, and men are demanding those things be done, that’s a problem.

    Yes, strippers dance on poles. Let’s make a rule that no faithful Christian woman would ever dance on a pole. What about dancing without a pole? Well, sometimes strippers do that too, so no good Christian wife should ever dance in front of her husband. What about high heels? Strippers wear high heels. Well, they are usually really high heels, so let’s say that Christian women can wear heels up to 2.5 inches, but anything higher than that, Stripperville.

    Maybe if I was still a practicing Christian I’d feel differently about this. But I honestly have no issue with what two consenting (really consenting, not “the good wife submitting to her husband” consenting) adults do in their own bedroom.

    There is one final nagging question I have, however. Are there really a huge number of people who HAVE stripper poles in their bedrooms? Can you pick one up at Home Depot?

  • http://www.seekingfaithfulnessblog.blogspot.com Holly

    Ah. I never like how I sound after midnight. I should be more coherent. :)

    But of course, that does not stop me and I live to comment yet again. :)

    Two thoughts this morning:

    1) One of the most beautiful things about Christian marriage is being able to say “You fulfill me. You complete me. I am content with you and with what we have. ” You don’t always have to seek the next thing, seek the next thrill, the next big excitement. That does not mean it is NOT exciting….no, no no! :) It is!

    2) You know what nauseates me? I’ve seen – on Christian marriage and sex advice sites – entire furniture sets devoted to enhancing a couple’s sex life. Thousands of dollars can be invested into making the sex life “exciting,” with everything from swings to special furniture. It’s all deemed “okay” because the Bible doesn’t specifically say anything against it. Well, yeah…okay, that’s true, it doesn’t seem to, in literal, straight, easy to read words – but it does when you look at overarching principles in the scriptures.

    My big problem with this ties into your previous poverty posts, EE. Spending money on sex swings and dance poles and expensive toys to gratify our desires (and increase our tendencies to lust for ever more exciting ways to gratify our desires) while we neglect to give generously? (Read Richard Stern’s The Hole in Our Gospel for some horrid statistics on Christian compassionate giving. We stink. That book will kick ya in the tail. Something like 4 percent of Christians give to their churches or to philanthropic causes – and out of church budgets only 2 percent gets spent on either missions or compassionate causes. Abysmal.) But we have money for our sexual enhancement.

    I really do think we have to answer for that. I’m not trying to give a guilt trip – I hate uncalled for guilt or false guilt. But the starvation of children around the world is undeniable – and like you have said, Elizabeth, we who are Christians really HAVE to agree to look at it, to face it, and to see our complicity.

    (The answer is not to be ascetic in our marriage relationships. The answer is to find contentment and fulfillment with what we have, to say “I have enough,” to not always be seeking the next thing. In so doing, we have more to give, outwardly.)

    I really do think Christians have been co-opted by the pornographic business and they don’t even realize it. I see a strange correlation to the athiests who sat up a business offering pet care services for Christians for after the rapture – you know, on the slight chance that the pets wouldn’t go too. Someone would need to watch out for fido and fifi, and for a modest fee – they would gladly do so. (Yes, it is really a business.) I just get the feeling in both situations that someone is snickering all the way to the bank.

    Well, there you go. My strong opinions of the day. I don’t say things like this often online, but I do feel strongly that we misunderstand so much about these related issues: Gluttony in one group (and yes, you can be a sexual glutton even in marriage, where you crave more and more and are never satisfied) and poverty, destitution in another group of people.

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      Holly: you just inspired me. There IS a link between poverty and pornography–we use the very same excuses to justify our unwillingness to do anything about it. I just finished reading Shane Claiburn’s book about ordinary radicals. “The Hole in Our Gospel” is next on my list!!

    • ARM

      Holly, I’ve loved all your comments on this, and I especially like your point (1) here. You put a finger on what’s offputting about the “godly marriage bed” porn some Christians promote. All these bells & whistles, special equipment and special techniques – our culture needs this stuff because it has such a jaded appetite. Is that what we should aspire to, too? I’m pretty newly married, so what do I know, but my husband and I are still pretty excited about making love, period. I think I’d feel rather sad and embarrassed if he (or I) needed all these artifices.

  • http://www.kathleenbasi.com Kathleen Basi

    I didn’t read all the comments yesterday, so this was an interesting post to find this morning. I think the primary problem here is not with poles or stripping or any other external, it’s how it’s used by the couple. Modern culture has taken sex and stripped it of its essential holiness, downgraded (degraded?) it to a recreational thing, and within or without marriage, the problem is the same: use instead of love. Any one of the externals being debated can probably be used as a way to give oneself to the other, but often (usually?) aren’t. I guess what I’m getting at is that when we fuss about the externals, it is, in some ways, a way to avoid talking about the deeper problem–that being, Sex is supposed to be a total self-gift, and generally isn’t, because that’s not what the culture presents, and people aren’t being shown a better way.

  • Tracey

    What I have been reading from this whole thread is not a list of ‘do’s and don’ts in the marriage bed, but a discussion that puts words to what I think many women may feel about the marriage bed and what it may mean for them in their personal lives.

    I have always had an incredibly difficult time being open and honest with my now spouse when it comes to sex and I do think much of that stems from how degraded my ex made me feel just in general. These posts have put words to what I have felt for very long time in my own life, but could not put my finger on what was bothering me.

    I really do not care what other people do in their own privacy. I don’t think that is the point of this discussion and I don’t really think anyone is telling anyone else that they should feel ashamed for what they do or don’t do in the bedroom. However, I DO think today’s view of sex can most definitely put ENORMOUS pressure (or in many cases, create ENORMOUS liberation) on many women AND men. And, just like anything else that many or just some women may feel uncomfortable with, we are being told to “shut-up” and that there is something wrong with us if we DON’T want to pole dance for our husbands “just because” they are our husbands! We are being told that if we DON’T feel safe doing that with our husband even in a perfectly healthy relationship, then there is something wrong with us.

    But not “just” that, we are getting these messages FROM OTHER WOMEN…again, WHY are we so hard on each other? And why do we perceive that others are beign hard on us when really that isn’t the intent at all in most cases?

  • Tracey

    Oops…..left the html open. Sorry!

  • Tracey

    Oh dear, I do think it’s necessary to mention, for the sake of my hubby, that he NEVER makes me feel degraded, ever. It’s just simply baggage I have from my first marriage. He’s just NOT the kind of person who would ever press me into doing anything that would be uncomfortable for me. I’m afraid I may have unintentionally put him in a poor light.

  • Tracey

    An, one other thought, I DO think that the invention of The Pill 60 plus years ago, has most defintiely created a culture of recreational sex. Not that I think that’s necessarily a bad thing for marriages, but there is no question in my mind, that The Pill opened a door or Pandora’s box of a new kind of sexual liberation/bondage for society in general.

  • Robyn

    I don’t think too much of what I have to say is that great, and it may not even be Truth which is what really matters…….and this really isn’t that spiritual. But, when I read this late last night the first thing that came to my mind in defense of Pole Dancing (bc being defensive is apparently what I do best….I am just learning that truth is More Important), is that some of these women are pretty darn talented. A year or so ago I happened upon a pole dancing video which was also playing a pretty interesting song……Right or Wrong, the video caught my eye……maybe bc I was raised that all such things were trash and sin in my pretty straight Christian home. I found the video, and thought about trying to attach it, but I won’t in case that would be wrong. The song was by a group Evanesance-Wake Me Up or something like that. Anyway, I was just pretty impressed with how strong and limber some of these women were. Hanging onto an upright pole with one arm or hanging upside down from their legs……..balancing themselves vertically……I was just pretty impressed!!!! It was a competition and the video showed different dancers. So, apparently there are competitions for such things. I was just pretty impressed, bc I don’t think I could even stay on a pole using all fours, plus make it look graceful!!!!

    The lady in the video on tv, was she teaching Christian Pole Dancing all the time or just on Sundays. Seems like it was just on Sundays–to introduce more people to this. You take your church bulletin and get a discount. The news said she had been a dancer and didn’t like all of it, so she took the parts she liked and left the other parts out–it said she didn’t teach how to strip or to make money or anything sexual. It kind of reminded me of “Christian Skate Night” skating centers used to have here in my area. There prime nights were Fri., Sat., Wed., but if you took your bulletin in on Sunday night you got in at a discount I think. Also they played Christian music. Being a strong Christian or “wannabe” I thought this was great, but thinking now especially about another comment, maybe it was just to get our money as Christians, a marketing ploy, bc Christians are their own little niche and everything in this world is about making a living.

    I first heard about Christian pole dancing years ago, I think. Whether it’s right or wrong in marriage, idk, but I know it’s not just pole dancing that’s the subject. I think it is Holiness!! So, thanks for giving me a reminder about holiness. Something it seems I did hear in the news a decade ago was a Prostitute for Jesus. I think she gave all, most, or some of her money to the church??? Something like that. I was pretty shocked. I think Jesus wanted to heal people so they could “go and sin no more”??? Some things are not spelled out in the Bible, but I don’t think I can find where prostitution is ok??? Even if it is mentioned in the Bible…..

    Speaking of that, I think it was Judah (one of the 12 sons of Jacob) that went out and found a prostitute. It turns out it was his daughter in law who wanted to have a baby, and he got her pregnant, and he had given her his staff for collateral. I hope I got the story right. (This story may be where the “sin of Onan” issues/debates come in—Hey would you do a post about that–pretty personal stuff whatever it is, but the things I have heard have been pretty confusing) Anyway, I just wanted to show that people have been perverting sexual relations for a long, long, long, long, long, long………..time!! :) Maybe things were a little different in the US a generation or two back, but I’m not totally sure. Every generation sometimes seems to talk as if things were SO much better in their time. I’ve started to wonder. I think there has always been good and bad–people who try to follow God, and those who do not follow…..

    Also I just wondered about you and your husband a little–not too deep. Is your husband really “That Pure”?? He looks like a nice, stable guy. Has he never struggled with any of this stuff?? Has he never looked at another woman or you with any lust at all?? If so, that would be really great and really pure, bc I don’t hear about it too often. I think I as a woman have struggled with some of this. Ok, I admit I think I’ve had a few sexual issues, even though I was not very promiscuous bc of the way I was raised. I was raised with a lot of “don’ts” and a whole lot of guilt it seems……..I just wondered too if you have grown a lot in this area, or are trying to, since it seems I read in one of your articles about sex that you may have seemed immature about marriage or sex bc you were so anxious to just have sex……….(hope I’m remembering what I read correctly). It’s really easy to be celibate or to not struggle with sex—-If One Chooses To Be, like the girl who wrote in. There is fulfillment in life without it…..But, I think there is a struggle for many, especially younger people when you want to experience it, but are told you can never experience it until you get married—when and if that ever happens????? I do think it is for marriage still, though. Sex is not the end all, be all, but I think it’s easy to see that After you have experienced it.

    Just thinking about things, I had a roommate who apparently really struggled with sex, and I was little chaste girl who was taught it was wrong—–but yet I had my own deep struggles with depression and negativity…………I think from her I started being less judgmental about other people and things……..We’re All sinners just trying to make our way in this world. Being truly saved is the key, I think, and having your own relationship with God……..And for those of us raised in church, I don’t think we really get any extra brownie points, bc after 18 years growing up even in that environment, some of us are still a little screwed up…….:) I hope I have grown some, but there are still many many things in my life I don’t like…….still so many screw-ups, and I’m 43. I figure by the time I am 60 or 80 maybe I’ll get it all right…..but I don’t think my little body will make it that long…..like I said I’m negative. :)

    Just one more thing, I think…..I don’t think “anything goes” in the bedroom, but I may not be right. Anything involving a body part not specifically designed for sex, I don’t see how that could be ok……….see there are many things a whole lot worse than Pole Dancing……:)

    Anyway, thanks for the article, and I’ve enjoyed reading everything, especially the reminder about holiness, and reading the explanation and justification for NFP…..

    Also, I just wondered if you have officially joined the Catholic Church or do you just attend?? I think I read that you go to mass by yourself and you go to another church with your family–Presbyterian??? Also, is it ok to ask what denomination your husband was raised in??? If anything asked is too personal, sorry, and ignore me.

    I have tons of questions about life and spirituality, so I may ask you some periodically. Here’s one for another article maybe. I guess also since I saw the word soul mentioned on here. What is the ultimate end goal in God creating all of us?? I guess I’m thinking of our bodies and the afterlife. Are we male/female creatures created to procreate so some can be soul/spirit beings for eternity…….sometimes I just don’t understand it all!! I’m thinking of Jesus’ parable where he answers and says that in the next age those who enter won’t marry or be given in marriage but will be like the angels………Any Answers?????? If you hold to the Catholic Church, what do they teach???

    Thanks for any answers and for your writing. Your family looks lovely to me–Congrats!!! You guys must be doing something right. :)

  • amber

    Honestly, I was on the fence yesterday about your post. I could see your argument, but I could also see the arguments of all the older ladies in my life that gave me so much advice (before I got married).

    I waited until marriage. I dreamt of having the sex that my hormones had primed me for… I have to say, every time I had that lustful sex… it wasn’t nearly as soul satisfying as the times where we were untied as one.

    Thank you for highlighting your reader’s comments today. They did get lost in the shuffle and my eyes could only handle so much… I went to bed praying that God would give me the answer to shove me either way over the fence. I was totally convicted as I read Chuck’s response. As a wife of a husband that has struggled in the past with pornography, I DO NOT want to be a trigger for him.

    Ps, I know how to be sexy. No one had to teach me. ;)

  • http://www.shackbible.com ShackBibleGuy

    EE, thank you for posting these! I hadn’t read Chuck’s comments before, and I think they are right ON. I don’t feel the need to make any absolute moral pronouncement about pole-oriented sex play, but I will say that if someone is turned on by a fantasy of a partner who can’t say No, that’s unhealthy.

    Oh, and Chuck, your definition of “porn” is GREAT. Keep doing what you do! The tsunami of sex addiction in our culture has barely begun.

  • http://frombitterwaterstosweet.blogspot.com/ Mara

    EE,
    I want to add my thanks to the others for highlighting some of the best comments from the previous posts.

    Our culture IS incredibly porn saturated. So much so that those living in it think diviant is normal.

    There is a lot of pressure put on Christian women the behave as whores rather than as fellow heirs in Christ. Women in the porn industry see it and know it for what it is. Christian woman (and men) are being snowballed into accepting and pursuing some behavior that is even damaging.

    The pornification of marriage and a certain book of the Bible, which will remain nameless, has hurt and damaged more people and marrages than what the peddlers want anyone to know, peddlers who have become quite wealthy pushing their wares.

  • Rebecca

    I’ve been reading your blog for a while but this is my first time commenting. I think your posts on this topic have been spot-on and some of the comments have been very interesting. Sex can be a tough topic to discuss calmly and rationally, mainly I think because it is very personal and because God created it to be so incredibly powerful.

    I’ve had the privilege to teach religion at a Catholic high school for the past five years and have taught a human sexuality / theology of the body unit for freshmen. I’ve seen firsthand that this is one major area where the Church is called to be a sign of contradiction in the world; while that’s very difficult to do, I am impressed by your courage in continuing to thoughtfully explain your moral views in a world that is increasingly relativistic. It’s so common today to hear people say that while they might have personal views on a serious moral topic, each person “needs to find their own truth” or something like that.

    Right and wrong do actually exist, and it doesn’t do anyone any favors in the long run to pretend that they don’t. This doesn’t mean that people need to be legalistic and go around acting as the morality police (which I don’t think you’ve done here) but instead, as people who have been entrusted with much, it’s important to explain your own beliefs. Then, people can choose to agree or not, and their choice is their own, but they need to be able to make an informed choice in the first place.

    Sorry this has gotten to be so long! All this is to say that I appreciate what you’re doing here and how open you are to speaking the truth, as difficult as it may be.

  • http://www.moonchild11.wordpress.com moonchild11

    Thank you for that last post. Like several people have said here, pole dancing and other certain sexual acts are not wrong in and of themselves. But they definitely represent a culture that has been infinitely harmful to men and degrading and dehumanizing to women. maybe some people see using those acts in the marriage bedroom as redeeming of them? I respect people who have such a view point but I really hope those who do that are able to remember the harm that comes from the porn industry.

  • Sarah

    Riiiiight. So all the comments you’ve highlighted in today’s post are the ones that agree with you.

    Is there any point in trying to engage in discussion here?

    • http://www.elizabethesther.com elizabeth

      There is still quite a good discussion going on in the original post. Feel free to engage!

  • Anna

    I think we need to consider a few things:

    Firstly, people have different struggles because of past experiences with such things as pornography (and I think the reason that aspects of pornography should stay far away from marriage is that pornography is self-centered). Perhaps one person has a problem with particular underwear, another with high heels, and another with particular activities. These things likely are not inherently wrong, but they may be tainted due to association. I am not very familiar with pole-dancing, for example, so the video posted earlier did not seem sexual at all to me; rather it reminded me of rope gymnastics, but another person might have a big problem with it.

    Additionally, people go about sex differently and prefer different things which may or may not involve poles, swings, special lingerie, or whatever people do. But in my opinion, once a couple keeps looking for new things to spice up their sex life, there is a problem. Not that their sex life has been pornified necessarily, but I think that it is likely indicative of other problems in their relationship such as communication problems.

  • anonymous

    Just peeking in to say that perhaps some of the argument is because some of you ladies do *not* have the personal experience of having porn leak into your bedrooms. Good for you! If you and your husbands can bring some of these, um, techniques, into your relationship innocently, then great.

    What EE and some commenters writes really resonates with me. I do not have proof that my ex-husband had a porn problem, but I have evidence. I also know that what he asked of me in the bedroom clearly came from *outside* our marriage, and I can’t imagine he would have even known to ask for certain things had he not been viewing porn. I had no desire to step into those sorts of fantasies, and my attempts to submit ended up in total objectification, crossing the line into abuse and marital rape, and eventually divorce. Total worst case scenario, and I realize it’s not the norm. But I do think that the pornification of marriage opened the door.

  • Joe K

    Elizabeth,

    Much of what follows is alluded to in one form or another throughout the previous comments on this post and your previous post but I havn’t seen it collected in a single post so here is goes.

    Something that is fully pertinent to this discussion, but has only been sporadically touched on, is the underlying truth of human sexuality.
    There are three aspects to that underlying truth and they are that sexuality is procreative, pleasurative and unitive. It is in light of this basic premise that I continue.

    As far as the procreative goes, in order for the human race to continue, humans must reproduce. That’s kind of a no brainer.

    As far as the pleasurative goes, in order to foster the above mentioned procreative action, our creator (People can attempt to define “Creator” differently but, we ALL, atheists included, undeniably have a creator) has made that act pleasurable. Also pretty much a no brainer because if it hurt like H.E.<> we probably wouldn’t be here right now.

    The unitive aspect is, unlike the other aspects, mostly a metaphysical concept. There are few things in this existence that are truly yours, some of those are your word, your opinion and, pertinent to this discussion, your sexuality. These do not belong to others; they are yours and yours alone to give. In giving your sexuality to someone else, as it is designed by our creator, we are in essence saying to another person, by our actions,

    “You are important enough to me that I intend to share something with you that you can get from no one else.”

    How freely a person is willing to share that sexuality is based on how much the “giver” values their sexuality.

    The other concept to consider in this discussion is the nature of the Utilitarian society we live in. This applies to sexuality especially when we consider acts identified in this and the previous post. The goal of each of these acts and other acts like them are to enhance the sexual pleasure of the person on the receiving end of the action, very much a Utilitarian goal.

    A portion of the unitive nature of human sexuality can rightly be the desire to enhance the sexual pleasure of the other. So the acts, identified in this and the previous post, in and of themselves and if rightly intended, are not necessarily a negative action when considering the unitive and pleasurative aspects of human sexuality.

    A problem almost inevitably develops because we live in what is very much a Utilitarian culture where we tend to base the value of things on how well they work and what they do to make our lives better or in this case more pleasurable. If we base the value of how much pleasure an act gives us, then we lose sight of the other, deeper and more important aspects of human sexuality.

    Since human sexuality has three fundamental aspects, (procreative, pleasurative and unitive) maintaining all those aspects in balance is the only way to truly act in accordance with the fundamental truths established by our Creator.

    How many people can honestly say that the purpose of that stipper pole they want in their bedroom is to enhance the unitive aspects of their bond with another? If you can, then I say go out to Home Depot and build one. After all, it’s substance is just a cylindrical piece of metal, it’s the accidents that really matter in this case.

  • Leanne

    Here are some thoughts…from someone who is dedicated to being single so take it for what it is worth….
    1. Love and relationship is about valuing the other person. I Corinthians 13 assumes we are going to need to be patient with each other. The chapter forces us to focus on the other person’s safety and comfort and growth.
    2. Sin is taking what is holy and good and distorting it. This can happen in a marriage. I have heard people who abuse their loved one say “its because I love them.” Violence is a distortion of passion.
    Any sexual act which is for the pleasure of one and is demeaning to the other is a distortion of that which is good. No matter if it is in the confines of marriage or not. Is the person being valued for who they are instead of what they do?
    Maybe I am completely off on this.

  • Tammy

    Im shocked that more people didnt jump on Chuck’s bandwagon…he makes some wonderful observations that I think were wise to consider. Its not pole dancing vs non pole dancing its the damage of our relationships going from real to fantasy (which can never be sustained or helpful) which eventually degrades whatever good reality was in the marriage to begin with.

    His comments about “romantic porn” for women makes the same point. I am not proposing some legalistic rules that “pole dancing and romantic comedies are not OK for Christian marriage” but rather I would suggest each of us consider what worldly things we allow to enter our minds that hurt our marriages rather than edifying them.

    In our house, we have (kind of jokingly) adapted the word “porn” for various things that are really not good for us….real estate magazines filled with houses we will never need and cant afford are “house porn” : )

    • http://www.joyinthisjourney.com Joy

      YES. Chuck’s comments about porn totally rocked my world.

  • http://www.joyinthisjourney.com Joy

    I admit it — I disagreed with your original post. But then I read this one, and it gave me a lot to think about, especially about the place sex should have, even in a marriage. I think I just a glimpse of a bigger picture, and I think it’s going to really help me think about sex and my husband in a healthier way.

    Besides, as much as I may joke about pole-dancing, I can’t get away from the icky feeling it gives me — even thinking about it makes me feel objectified. Plus I can’t even walk in flip-flops without wabbling. There’s no way I could twirl around a pole and look sexy. I’d probably bring the thing crashing down and end up the ER with a concussion.

  • Catherine

    I just read a good post on Rachel Held Evans blog regarding the catholic view of sex : http://rachelheldevans.com/ask-a-catholic-response, (see the question about contraception). I don’t agree with the end of the response (in his view, women are meant to stay home and mother) …but that’s another story ;)

    Thank you for initiating a much needed conversation!

    • http://bluebonnetreads.wordpress.com Hannah C.

      I didn’t read his response as saying that women should always stay home and mother. He talked about stay at home moms, yes, but I didn’t see it as being prescriptive, more like “if you are called to this vocation, then..” :)

  • Margaret

    I’m glad you are brave enough to talk about stuff like this, EE. :)

    I tend to agree with you. I won’t say there is some specific rule about sexual accoutrements and all that.

    But I am so grateful to have married a man whose mind has not been “pornified”. He’s not American, and so he grew up with the sexy-sexy-hot-sex-whooooo-baby!!! culture completely absent from his childhood and teenage experience. He was totally shocked by my knowledge about sex and sexual stuff, and by what I *thought* “all men” liked.

    While we have had troubles with cultural differences, this is a cultural difference I will *never* complain about. It allows him to find my fat, flabby, post-baby body beautiful. It allows us to enjoy the marriage bed without performance anxiety. It allowed me to realize that it is *OK* for sex to be quiet, beautiful, and unitive and not necessarily earth-shaking every time. And what a relief that he doesn’t want from me certain things that I’d been led to believe by culture/media/Christian-sex-advisors are innate desires in men. Whew!

    • http://www.seekingfaithfulnessblog.blogspot.com Holly

      Margaret. I love your descriptors. :)

    • http://www.adamshome.blogspot.com erin

      it is *OK* for sex to be quiet, beautiful, and unitive and not necessarily earth-shaking every time” yes. this. it is making me teary right now.
      I, too, I am thankful to be married to a man who is not pornified (& he is American. there is hope for our country!!)

  • Pingback: Modesty Part 4: Of Prodigals and Pharisees | Created to be His

  • http://www.adamshome.blogspot.com erin

    I am going to throw a comment in the pile, before I finish reading all these.
    I am glad for this post discussion, Elizabeth. I believe it is much needed! I know of many young Christian couples feeling like sex was a lame disappointment. Saying, that because they were virgins at the wedding, they didn’t have a “fun honeymoon”.
    there is so much missing in the discussions about sex in the church. Don’t just preach “wait” & then let folks be “educated” by the culture.
    My husband & I were virgins going into our honeymoon. We knew the beginning of our sex life wasn’t going to be some porn movie. It would be a little scary, it would be exciting, it would be humbling, it would be vulnerable, it would be learning love, it would be learning communication, it would be unifying. And that is huge. We weren’t short-changed, just because we didn’t know any good moves. It was our beginning, together. Sex is about that- together.

  • http://www.adamshome.blogspot.com erin

    I’ve never read theology of the body (though I would like to, at some point), but here’s something I read in another book, quoting from John Paul II.
    that his description of Chasity is “the integrity of love & the putting of one’s emotional center and, in a sense, one’s self, in the custody of another.” Lust as the opposite of chastity desires use of of another human being, rather than mutual self giving. Marriage does not guarantee chastity.
    I know of gals in “christian” marriages, who are used & not loved, but feel the need to submit to such horrific treatment.
    Oh. @ tammy. I am on the Chuck bandwagon. He was enormously helpful. Right on, Chuck!

    • http://www.adamshome.blogspot.com erin

      oh goodness. this is silly to comment again. but, just so all the non-Roman Catholics don’t just write off my comment, I should say, I am not Roman Catholic. :)

  • Claire in Tasmania

    I find comments about sex being ‘mainly’ about seeking the other person’s pleasure very unhelpful. Statistically, most people can’t/don’t have vaginal orgasms, so it follows that most people will be taking it in turns to give and receive pleasure. And its all muddled together anyway. I derive pleasure from giving my DH pleasure and vice versa. I can’t see the point or even make sense of the idea of trying to differentiate.
    I am also confused by the statement, “*Why* does a man think it’s sexy? Because he’s seen it on TV, or in a movie, or in a strip club?” I’m pretty sure strip clubs are erotic because stripping happens there, not the other way around. I’ve never seen pole dancing but my guess it that it’s intrinsically erotic, making use of moves that men and women have known for millennia. It’s not erotic because of a certain association that has been made in the past. Porn may have discovered or invented pole-dancing, but porn didn’t make it erotic. Porn takes things that are erotic an makes them vulgar and degrading.
    I’m just not sure how it’s possible to define what is or isn’t ‘pornified’ in our culture. When I strip for my DH I don’t feel degraded or used because the look in his eyes tells me he loves, cares about and appreciates ME *as well as* enjoying what he sees. It’s just one of many ways, as mentioned above, of enjoying him enjoying me enjoying him…

    Oh, and someone said in the other thread that purely recreational/non-procreative sex is always slightly sinful. If that were the case, why doesn’t the Torah say it’s wrong to have sex wile pregnant or after menopause?