Sitting on the couch with Michael Pearl

Now that the show has aired for most of the country, I’m going to share more of my experience. First, to answer today’s most frequently asked questions along with some of my own:

1. I do not know if the show will run in its entirety online. I am only seeing partial clips–all of Pearl talking–on Anderson’s website.

2. Was a ‘talking-points’ memo sent out by the Pearls’ “ministry”? Because all of the negative comments about the show from Pearl supporters sound suspiciously similar; ie. “Pearl wasn’t given enough time to explain his views!” What’s going on, here? Pearl has had like 15 YEARS to explain his view through his books, newsletters and website. Sure, the producers had to edit things for time–but I can tell you that when I was sitting there during the taping? Pearl had more air-time than ANYONE else.

3. I’m not interested in debating pro-Pearl supporters here on my blog. At this point, I’m simply being asked the same questions repeatedly–which means people aren’t reading what I’ve already written. In fact, today someone actually told me I would “KNOW” the Pearls don’t advocate abusive methods if I’d read their books. *sigh* Really? Really? I guess it doesn’t count that I’ve underlined, highlighted and made NOTES in their books. Dude.

And anyway, there are other places on the Internet for debating about the Pearls. This blog is not one of those places. This blog is a safe place for those who have been hurt. Just because you raised your kids using the Pearl’s methods and everyone “turned out great!” doesn’t really mean anything to me. Lots of kids turn out great IN SPITE of being abusively spanked. So, the anecdotal evidence of pro-Pearl supporters means very little, honestly.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: until we can morally justify the spanking of infants, it is intellectually dishonest to claim Pearl’s teachings are harmless.

Moving on to my experience of the show:

When the producers told me I’d be sitting on the couch with Michael Pearl, I almost had a panic attack. Please understand that this man has sown so much fear, sorrow and intimidation into the lives of myself and so many others that the very thought of sitting next to him frightened me.

And yet, as I stood there waiting to take the stage, I was filled with a deep awareness of….safety. One Scripture I often repeat to myself is: Be not afraid. For me, this means living and acting from a place of wholeheartedness and compassion. It means standing for truth with humility and an open heart–even in the face of your greatest fear.

As I walked to the stage, I wondered if Michael Pearl would want to shake my hand. I decided to shake his hand mainly because I wanted to be gracious.

However, I did not allow Michael Pearl to ask me personal questions. You can see in the clip that I did not answer his question about spanking a child who runs into the street. That was intentional. I know fundamentalists very well and one of their main tactics is to trap their detractors by asking baiting, personal questions. I did not come on the show to debate Michael Pearl. I came to share my story and speak for hurting children.

During a commercial break, Michael Pearl tried to ask me a personal question. I ignored him. After the show, he tried to talk to me in the hallway–he actually asked me about my relationship with my parents! I turned away and told one of the producers standing next to me that I wasn’t willing to engage in a personal conversation.

Here’s the thing: I know how to be gracious and remain composed. But I also have boundaries. And my boundary that day was to refuse a personal, buddy-buddy conversation with Michael Pearl. I was there to defend children, not answer personal questions about my family life.

On the stage, it took every last ounce of strength for me to remain calm, focused and gracious. I did not want to become angry—although nothing makes me angrier than the abuse of children!–because I knew that by becoming angry I would give the Pearl supporters reason to write me off and discredit me.

And let’s be very clear, here. Pearl supporters ARE trying to discredit me. Apparently, because I learned these teachings in a cultish, controlling church–well, THAT’S why I perceive these teachings as abusive.

I’m sorry. Even in the healthiest church, these teachings would be considered abusive.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: until we can morally justify the spanking of infants, it is intellectually dishonest to claim Pearl’s teachings are harmless.

What was most striking to me about Michael Pearl–although I guess it’s not surprising–was his cold, callous demeanor. How could he sit there without showing one tiny flicker of remorse or sadness–even while listening to the 911 call of Hana’s mother?

I could tell Michael Pearl was dismissing me and not listening.  At one point he did this “pfft” scoffing noise (maybe it was edited out?), shook his head, said “no” to me, reached for his books and refused to make eye contact with me any further.

To me, this is the true tragedy of the Pearl ministry. There is no acknowledgment of moral responsibility. There is only stubborn, prideful defensiveness and a kind of cruel heartlessness.

Instead of listening to those of us who have been directly damaged by these harmful, graceless teachings–we are dismissed, we are ignored, we are discredited, we are called “emotional” and “illogical.” We are shamed into silence.

But I refuse to dwell on that because the good news is that others ARE listening!

We ARE being heard!

The outpouring of love and support I have received has been….so humbling. I just want to thank all of you. For years–YEARS–I believed nobody would listen. Nobody would hear. Nobody would care.

That has all changed.

Be not afraid. LOVE never fails.

This entry was posted in Michael & Debi Pearl. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Sara J

    EE, you did good. :)

    I was already impressed by how composed and articulate you presented yourself, knowing that an audience AND camera were on you. But when you turned and *looked* at him and spoke directly to him, I was in awe. I can rant about Pearl and his ilk, but I really doubt I’d have the courage to tell him directly that his methods are abusive. Your courage and composure said a great deal. I’m seeing a lot of cheering in your section — not because you’re so cool on TV, but because you said your piece without anger or attacks.

    Yay for you! Thank you!

    (Okay, maybe I’ve having a tiny groupie moment, when I’m saying, “Hey, I’ve followed her blog for, like, a YEAR before this clip came out!”)

  • Katy-Anne

    I have a lot of trouble taking you seriously, but it’s not because of debating Pearl…I agree he is a dangerous, horrible man, but because you are still pro-spanking you are just against spanking infants. You believe it’s ok to abuse children that are older by spanking. That is, unless you’ve changed your position on spanking since you told me on this very blog in the comment section how stupid I was for believing that spanking is wrong and abusive. If you have, I’d love to hear it.

    • Tammy

      Now is not a good time to get in her grill because she isn’t exactly like you. If you have kids that have never needed a single spanking (like my 3rd child) then good for you. Plenty of good, loving prudent parents use spanking judiciously. My now 20 yr old told me once “you spanked me just right…any more and I would have resented you, any less and I would have been out of control.”

      Ive never seen EE tell anyone here that they are “stupid”.

      • TealRose

        I had two children who were VERY hard work and in most pro’s eyes yes, ‘needing spanking’.  Except for the fact that NO ONE on God’s green earth needs hit … ever… not an adult, an animal or a child.  And did I spank ie HIT them?  No, I didn’t.  I taught them, and directed them.  Was it hard? Yes .. but that is what parenting is about, hard work.  Did I ‘want’ to spank them sometimes?  Yes… and I pray for forgiveness all the time for thinking such a mean sprited, ugly disgusting thing.  

        It is very interesting – that most of us would never even THINK of hitting the girl at the check out, or their partner, or great grandmother just because they did something you didn’t like, or were rude etc – but somehow a lot of us almost automatically think to HIT a small human being, and in some places that is actually legal.  I blame it on the fact that our parents hit us, and it made it ‘normal’ in our brains.  What on earth is normal about hitting a small child?  We worry about those who hurt animals – but small children???  Somehow they are ‘non people’ and aren’t deserving of grace as us adults are … !!! 

        • Tammy

          No I wouldnt hit a cashier or my partner or a great grandmother because they “did something I didnt like” and I also wouldn’t spank my child for “doing something I didnt like”.  I would spank to reinforce to a defiant 2 year old who was repeatedly darting into a busy street – doing so  might well save their life. I was a Pediatric Trauma nurse and I cared for the kids who got run over by cars and jumped out of windows. They will experience much less pain and stress with a spanking than a truck hitting them. 

          You have no right to assume that because I would spank a child to keep then from running into a street that I see children as “non-people”…to assume that I believe that  children are not deserving of Grace. The harshness of your accusations does not make me rethink spanking, it makes me angry that people rush to judgement. 

        • http://www.downtoearthwomen.blogspot.com Tracey

          **eyeball roll**

          It’s not the same thing. 

          Really, get over yourself. 

          • Agnes

            It SHOULD be considered the same thing.  They’re both human beings.  You feel entitled to hit a small child but not another adult?  Why?

      • Katy-Anne

        Oh, my bad. I thought most of the people commenting here were against child abuse but I guess I was wrong. Apparently a lot of you think hitting is ok if it’s done to a child that’s bigger than a baby and called “discipline” or “punishment”. And that’s why I’m skeptical of anything Elizabeth had to say to Mike Pearl. She’s not against spanking, she’s just against spanking babies.

        I’m sure you and Elizabeth are both WELL aware that you don’t need to say “you’re stupid” to call someone stupid. You can do that without saying those words. I’m sure you know exactly what I’m talking about. Women are great at it.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=665185905 Jennifer Sponheim Hampson

          This comment sounds a bit like the pot calling the kettle black to me.

          I’m no advocate of spanking, but I will say a quick swat on the bottom is not even in the same league as what Michael Pearl teaches parents to do to their children.  Systematic, ritualistic “training sessions” where a child is repeated tempted by the parent to do something they have been instructed not to do so the parent can physically condition them using painful stimuli is not at all the same.

          To say so is intellectually dishonest and muddying the waters, IMHO.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=665185905 Jennifer Sponheim Hampson

            Elizabeth, can you please delete my previous comment?  I’d like to write it under a name that doesn’t contain my facebook info.  I’ll resubmit under a different profile once its deleted.  I’d delete myself but I can’t figure out how!  Thanks!

        • Tara S

          You have no idea how angry I am right now. I just deleted a lengthy, spitting mad comment because it was just so very long.  I have now taken a deep breath and will try to be calm.

          Katy-Anne. Do you realize how ungracious and opportunistic you appear in these comments?  To tear down a woman who has just undergone what Elizabeth has undergone, who has shown the bravery and the grace to publicly face a man whose teachings have deeply wounded her and very possibly caused the deaths of innocent children, is really at the depths of crass.  You do not appear to be championing the rights of children. You appear to be using the blood and tears of this woman to publicly vaunt your superiority… to demonstrate how you are *even better* than the brave people who actually fight the dragons, because your philosophy is so much purer and more worthy.  

          It is easy to crucify the people who do the brave, hard, necessary things.  It is so easy, in fact, that it warrants no applause, and impresses no one.  

          • Tammy

            Yes, Tara, exactly…this is what I meant when I said “now is not the time”. EE faced down the very person she knew was responsible for her torment and the abuse and deaths of children and in the vulnerable moments when she is trying to recover from the monumental experience of PUBLICLY and PERSONALLY confronting this evil you pounce on her and ACCUSE her of being an abuser herself because you disagree with her on parenting techniques. Your words–>”You believe it’s ok to abuse children that are older by spanking”.  I bet if you asked EEs children about your comment they would be deeply hurt that thier committed loving  mom was publicly accused of abusing them. THere is a time and place to discuss the details of parenting but this was NOT it. 

        • Anonymous

          Katy-Anne: I’m sorry for whatever I have written that has offended you. Please understand that I am really trying my best and learning as I go. My heart is always open to learning better ways–would you consider extending some grace here in the comments? I have been through a very difficult ordeal in the past month confronting Michael Pearl. I’m sorry that it was not up to your standards. Have patience with me, friend.

        • http://thehomespunlife.com Sisterlisa

          Katy-Anne… you said, ” You can do that without saying those words.” …and I’m wondering if this would be a good example of what you mean… when you said….” I thought most of the people commenting here were against child abuse but I guess I was wrong.”

          This is a hot topic for sure, children have died. Being a voice of compassion to say “STOP! We need to re-examine these teachings and confront them head on…because children have DIED”. This message is never going to be easy to swallow. It hurts deeply. Many of us have triggers due to years of spiritual abuse and child abuse, but in order for us ALL to better ourselves and raise a more compassionate and responsible generation, we MUST speak up and this speaking up is going to hurt. It’s heartbreaking to see “clergy” confronted on their teachings…because for YEARS people have blindly trusted clergy…but we’ve all been let down time and time again. And we can’t stand by and watch children die.

          Lets take a step at a time…start with speaking up about what is OBVIOUS abuse..and go from there. Elizabeth addressed a VERY powerful topic on the show…saying this abuse is “of God” is very damaging. Did anyone even catch that? This is not only about physical abuse, but religious abuse..that is toxic to a child’s faith. and instead of attacking ONE woman who dared to go against the grain and speak so compassionately on behalf of children, try seeing that it was needful to be said and be thankful the discussion is open and on the table on a national level. This is just the beginning of what will be a long battle to true spiritual freedom for millions.

          Don’t attack the messenger because she “fails to be perfect” in all her beliefs (according to you)..be thankful this is opening eyes so we all can be better parents and walk with one another in this journey.

    • KatR

      If you’re going to insist that anyone who speaks out against Michael Pearl believes that all spanking is child abuse, that’s going to be a very small group of people, especially in this country.

      • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

        I would tend to say that all spanking is something of a failure on the part of the parent and that there is always a more effective alternative. (In fact, multiple controlled studies over many years have shown that spanking tends to not be very effective at much more than pretty short term behavior modification and it tends to have a diminishing effect in that category with repeated use. The classic question about kids running into the street is particularly ironic because that specific question has been studied. And they found that the spanked group vs those disciplined in other ways were the group most likely to repeatedly run into the street.)

        But that’s not at all the same thing as being abusive. Though once you allow violence as a means of controlling the behavior of your children, you’re walking closer to the edge than I think most people realize.

    • Anonymous

      Uh, Katy? You do realize I’m able to go through my comment archives and bring up the exact comment? I’ve never once called anyone stupid. If you want me to take YOU seriously, be honest.

      • http://thehomespunlife.com Sisterlisa

        I think some folks hear the word ‘spanking’ and assume their idea of spanking is the same as others.

      • http://www.downtoearthwomen.blogspot.com Tracey

        She wouldn’t even let me call anyone stupid and I have at least once…and she edited it making my reply softer than I wrote it…..and she admitted to doing so once my post was published. 

        • Anonymous

          I always admire passion and courage–I guess I just believe we can do that without resorting to name-calling. Thank you, Tracey, for understanding that. :)

    • http://guidetowomen.wordpress.com Sharideth Smith

      katy, i especially like it when you say you’d love to hear what elizabeth has to say, but only if she agrees with you now.  that’s awesome.  and by awesome, i mean not awesome.

  • Anonymous

    I just saw the video that you posted above, Elizabeth.  You spoke beautifully and logically about what is wrong with the method of discipline advocated by Michael Pearl.    Your courage is remarkable!

  • TAmmy

    I missed the initial broadcast, but in watching the clip. I APPLAUD ELIZABETH !!!    You ROCK!!!!    I am proud to call you friend 

  • KR

    EE, have you written on your views of disciplining your children? Would love to hear your thoughts on this after your experience with the Pearls. I think your assessment of Mr. Pearl is correct, after watching the show myself, while I don’t entirely disagree with Mr. Pearl, from what I saw on the show, I totally agree and appreciate your courage to stand up to his teachings that are either being misinterpreted or all together wrong.

    • Anonymous

      My views on disciplining my children are: love them, teach them, be willing to admit when you’ve made a mistake, show grace. And love them. Always. Love them.

  • http://karenhammons.mobi Karen Hammons

    The courage you displayed in this video has me speechless. You spoke brilliantly!!! Cheering you on!! 

  • http://www.fromtracie.com From Tracie

    You did a great job, Elizabeth – standing firm, speaking out for children, speaking out against abuse. 

    Thank you!

  • Bob Hamp

    Way to go EE!! I have always admired your clarity and conviction!! Go get ‘em and way to keep good boundaries!!!

  • Steph

    EE, so many thoughts running through my mind, but I think the first that came to mind is the important one. I am very impressed by your description of your encounter with him. Bless you. I can’t play the video right this minute but will be back to do so. In the meantime, I admire your sense of purpose and mission that allows you to stand near this man and say what you want to say and not be trapped into reacting or having him drag the conversation away from you, onstage or after. Having your own story to tell and also the ability to keep all the victims in mind and not frame it as a “debate” is what makes you the right person at the right time. I am glad this opportunity came your way, only sorry that it means others take aim at you now.  

    • Steph

      I watched the video. You did really well, really, really well. You got to the heart of the matter and spoke in a manner that commanded respect.

  • Ashley Swango

    You did amazing!! However, we need more info about what Anderson Cooper was like! Ha! ;)

    • Anonymous

      He was awesome. He has this amazing ability to think on his feet and have these brilliant questions immediately and right in the moment. He has a great journalistic mind and is always interested in getting the full story. He truly impressed me!

      • http://thehomespunlife.com Sisterlisa

        oh I LOVED that he asked “if your methods work so well why do you have to keep whipping the child?”

  • frogla

    EE, thank you for speaking out for all the children. This methodology & system using God as their authority on spanking is highly abusive and deadly. BRAVO!!! xoxo

  • Natasha

    I just watched the Anderson show and wanted to comment and say that you did an excellent job. :) Kudos!

  • https://creativecommons.net/prosario2000/identity Pedro M. Rosario Barbosa

    Dear Elizabeth …  I sent you an e-mail where I said all I needed to say about that.  Just know that I’m proud to know someone like you.  You are a shining light, never forget that.  Take care always.

  • Anonymous

    Today, you are my hero. 

  • http://moonchild11.wordpress.com Sarah Moon

    You are a true hero. Thank you for being so strong and brave. The world needs more women like you. 

  • http://thehomespunlife.com Sisterlisa

    You did a great job. My girls and I watched together and as you know the story of Lydia hits very close to home for us as residents of Butte County. I am so thankful that Mike Ramsey was interviewed as well. I’ve said it before, but if anything I was to ever write about training children was ever THAT misunderstood that a child would die, I would be devastated. I don’t understand how he could be so cold to that. He is more concerned about the image of his ministry and his theology because if we admits he was wrong he will suffer financial loss. But his pride will do far more damage than simply humbling himself to the Body of Christ in this matter.

    • Verity3

      This.

  • http://evenonesparrow.blogspot.com even one sparrow

    Thank you for sharing your experience.  I do hope they air it online in its entirety, because I don’t own a TV but I do so want to see it!

    I repeat, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is make perfect in weakness,” whenever I am about to have a panic attack.

  • http://theeternaldance.blogspot.com/ Lynelle

    I especially loved when you spoke directly to him.  Such power.  And then when you didn’t respond to him (on camera and off!  you go girl!)
    You refused to be manipulated or play victim.  

    Actually, though it won’t change him a bit, and wouldn’t change my “Michael Pearl”, I’m a bit envious that you actually got to speak some truth to him  publicly . . . and in an environment where you were supported.  

    You are making a difference.

  • Heather Terry

    I won’t get to see the whole show until Monday but watching this clip, all I can say is wow. wow. wow.  Amazing job, EE.

  • Bootsy328

    Elizabeth,
    I am curious if your husband went with you to the show, and if he did why the two of you did not sit down with Michael Pearl and discuss wth him your major issues of disciplining infants and spanking until the child’s will is broken.  From what I can gather, you are not opposed to modest spankings for a child rearing, you are opposed to what you perceive as these two extremes in his book.

    He seemed to be reaching out to you. Cold and calculating may be how Michael looks, but behind the exterior, he, like my Dad, is one who truly loves others and seeks to please God with every ounce of his life.  I think you have some good points when you attack the extremes, but if you truly want the Pearl’s to rewrite their book to better train parents, then respond to him by establishing a direct dialogue with him.  This is the Matt. 18:15 approach that may get you everything you want wthout destroying a good couple’s ministry. Would that not be the best of both worlds?

    • KatR

      Elizabeth did address her opposition to Pearl’s methods during the show. Why is her opinion invalid without the presence of her husband?

      • Bootsy328

        You missed my point.  Christians are to confront other believers individually as that is where they can find the most common ground and follow the Biblical approach to correcting wrongs.  I am simply asking her if she is willing to confront Michael in person with her accusations, or by email discussion, as she might get what she wants from him in that type of format.  I think it is best if a woman is to confront another man to have her husband with her. 

        • Suth_n_belle

          She DID approach him in person!! What, was that his projected holoimage on the couch?! Oh, and BTW… false teachers are to be exposed publicly, not glossed over in a little Mt 18 ceremony, as per the example of Paul. Just fyi. I hear the “Mt 18″ thing all the time. It’s a red herring to detract from the real issue.

        • http://www.downtoearthwomen.blogspot.com Tracey

          Further, Michael Pearl has been approached in person by MANY MANY others who have issues with him and his book. He’s not listening. Time to take his accountability up about a hundred notches. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/kara.murano Kara Murano

      I’m pretty sure EE specifically asked for no pro-pearl comments here :)

  • Becky L.

    Amazing job! You didn’t stutter or stammer, you were direct and you said what you needed to say. Fantastic.

    I am only seeing what is on this short clip, and so I am curious to hear what his response to you was. Or was it not worth hearing>

  • anothercindy

    So much of your reactions to Michael Pearl, fear and such I experience which is another confirmation of the emotional abuse I suffered under my ex-husband for years. Good for you with boundaries…trying to keep mine in place, today feeling cut to the quick. 

  • http://www.ericpazdziora.com Eric

    “What you’re doing is you’re saying that God is behind that. And that is abusive.”

    And here you were worried that you didn’t say it well enough. Massive fist pump! That totally rocked.

  • Anonymous

    You did such a beautiful job, EE.  I will do my best to help.

  • Mbheld

    My husband and I give you a big thumbs up! You did a wonderful job speaking for those who can’t speak for themselves. Proud of you!

  • theresa46

    Elizabeth, you did an EXCELLANT job speaking while sitting next to a man responsible for MURDER!!! I would rather sit by a rattling snake. You MUST  speak out against this man and his misguided methods.  It will take the bravery like those who survived the brutality of the Nazi holocaust.   Your blog is your Nuremberg, where you can tell YOUR story so other’s will know the TRUTH!!! God Bless you and yours….

  • http://www.coffeestainedclarity.com Bethany Bassett

    I can’t bring myself to watch the video clips. I just can’t; too much traumatic history directly associated with that man. But I am following the comments and feedback about your video and am in AWE of your courage to do this. Hoping for that sense of safety and peace to continue for you and your family. 

  • Bobbi

    It was difficult to watch the clip because when you described the methods advocated in the book – the spanking sessions part especially – I rocked back to my childhood and the coldly calculated spankings I  received on a regular basis with a hand-crafted paddle. It was as if I were back in that room, bent at the waist over the bed, arms stretched out in front of me, waiting for the first round. My father always took a few practice swings. I winced as the swell of cool air pushed past my thighs.

    The first round is the worst. After the first five or six smacks, the blood vessels break and strangely enough, the pain isn’t so bad the next round. By the 10th smack, you really don’t feel the physical pain any more. And you are powerless to do anything anyways. There’s nothing to do but take it.

    When a kid wakes up the next morning with bruises from one end of her backside to the other, she doesn’t feel loved. Or closer to God.

    So what does she do? She becomes an actress and her life is the stage. She learned to lie to herself and authority figures with finesse, and fake submission and all kinds of other behaviors to avoid punishment, all the while harboring resentment and anger definite lack of trust which seeps into every aspect of her relationships with others.

    Thank you for speaking out, Elizabeth. I admire your courage.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Raven-Foncell/100000429011160 Raven Foncell

    Good work there, and good work with this blog. there’s a name for a man who profits from teaching fear. It’s known in all lands, cultures, the name for such a man is —-coward! Which defines Mr. Pearl.  i wonder what kind of childhood he had? The only time i’ve seen any footage of him being emotional is when it’s about himself, very sociopathic.  i think it’s tim,e someone takes legal action against him in the name of the children who’ve lost there lives, and he has no remorse in anyway about it. Oh, he’ll cry loudly if he looses his forture, but won’t brake his cold poker face on the words spoken that tell of a little suffering due to his beliefs, and teaching. no god, whatever you percieve that God to be would ever approve of torturing a child as he promotes to do!  There’s no justification for beating innocents, it can only be unforgiven!  I just joined this fight this past October when I read Hana’s story. Heavily emailed, and as ddi my fellow Facebook group memebers, of the group “Rememberance of Hanna williams”  the Seattle Times asking why her story wasn’t reciving more attention. Was happily surprised when I walked up the a paperdispensive on Monday November 27th, and saw Hana’s beautifl smiling face looking back at me. Front Page! Yes, this story is now front page news in Seattle! M<any have worked from all over the country, and world to help get, keep her story in the news. the Etheopian community has worked tiredlessly demanding answers about her death. Her story shown om CNN 360, had me see the story about Lydia Schatz, and I started lookijng into this guy, which using the trem man is hard for me to do, M. Pearl.  "Rememberance of Lydia Schatz" is the Facebook group I started, after I found only authopsy reports, and what happened to her sites when i put her name in google search. I wanted a place for the little to be just remembered.  I've promised myself  i won't rest until the williams are in jail. What kind of judge, susan Cook of Skagit county Superior court lowers bail on the accused after reading the briefs of what they're accused of doing? will she lower sentance if they are convicted? I hope media involved start asking such question of that court.  I did!  got a curt email from the court clerk. which I attached to my last email to the Seattle times before the article ran. Asking, if Hana looked like amanda Knox, would we be seeing more of her story then we are now?  took guts for you to sit next to such a manipulative person. Yes, personal questions are is  such a tool a kind like him uses.  Again, good work. Yes, you did great!!!!! 

  • Ann Bowen

    You did a wonderful job. And you didn’t turn it into a Maury like sob fest, your emotions were true and he just sat there like an ass. I hope more of the country comes to see what he and his followers have done to a generation of children. Bravo!!!

  • Renee

    Thank you for being SO BRAVE!!

  • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

    Way to go EE!

    And the truth is that kids are resilient. (The older we get, the less resilient we seem to get, but we often still have surprising capacity in that area.) Some break. Sometimes even those who experienced much worse don’t break and find healing. Some experience things that boggle the minds of others and become relatively unscathed adults.

    Unfortunately, the reverse is true as well. A child can be loved, given structure and boundaries, and given many other advantages, yet still walk dark paths as an adults.

    Parenting matters, and can matter a great deal. But neither good nor bad parenting can assure any particular outcome. And in many ways that’s a good thing. After all, aren’t most of us a mixed bag as parents? It’s good that our mistakes don’t really “scar our kids for life” even if that also means the things we do right don’t guarantee a positive outcome.

  • shadowspring

    (((EE))))

    Great job!  Kudos, much love and respect from this former-fundie mom.

  • Adele

    Hi Elizabeth, I’m a long-time reader, first-time commenter. I’m from Australia so I probably won’t be able to see the full show, but just from the clips that I’ve seen I am in awe of your courage, you are so brave and truly an inspiration.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kara.murano Kara Murano

    I dont know you (except through this blog) but I seriously admire you and your bravery to speak up & remained composed & confident. I am happy someone is speaking out against the Pearls. 

  • Robin

    Wow, my heart was pounding for you as you walked on stage ~ you spoke well and with truth.  Thank you for your courage to confront him and these teachings. 

  • Clairezip

    I really wanted to tell you that I noticed you purposefully not answering him on stage and I thought that was excellent to not answer a personal question to him.  I believe your intuition and past have given you wisdom to avoid that manipulation and fear mongering and I was so proud of you for ignoring that question.  Every time I picture in my mind little children having these humiliating and abusive ‘spanking sessions’ I want to cry and I am so thankful that you are speaking out to hopefully save more and more children from this abuse.  You remind me of a brave character in Madeleine L’engles “wrinkle in time” series.  You really are inspiring. 

  • Melissa M

    I have only seen clips since I missed the whole thing, but you were AMAZING. You summed up what I haven’t been able to put in words and you were so brave. Thank you for standing up and doing this. 

  • Blair Bailey

    I’ve only read your blog a few times, but I just had to comment here that as a mom I am so proud of you!  Thank you for standing up for children who can’t stand up for themselves.  Standing ovation for you!

  • B. Rose

    I just did a presentation on domestic violence in the christian community. I opened w/ a CNN report on one of the girls who had been killed, in which the Pearls were interviewed, and closed with this clip of you confronting Michael Pearl. In between I shared my story of being raised under this method. After my class of 20 watched you confront Michael Pearl, they all applauded. 

    You are brave, and you’re a hero for those kids.

    • http://www.downtoearthwomen.blogspot.com Tracey

      Is it a powerpoint presentation? If so, I would really like to see what you shared. This topic is one of deep interest to me as a formerly battered wife. The church did absolutely nothing to help me and I reached out to them many times. 

      I finally concluded that the church either has no idea how to deal with the subject of abuse, or their dealing with it is an abysmal failure. The topic of domestic abuse in the Christian community is an elephant in the chapel. 

    • Anonymous

      Thank you, B. Rose, for standing up for children!

  • Cynthia Kunsman

    And let’s be very clear, here. Pearl supporters ARE trying to discredit
    me.

    Elizabeth,

    Please take heart in the fact that you only intimidate the weak, and opposition will generally ignore someone who is not a threat.

    If they’re resorting to damage control at this point, that means you successfully challenged them and they found it necessary to counter you.  Consider that you successfully accomplished your objective.

    That’s something to rejoice over.

    Christians are not called to tickle ears, saying only that which is sweet.   In our conflicts within the Body, we are iron sharpening iron, with shavings and sparks flying.

    You may feel out on a limb alone, but you are not.  You’re held in the righteousness of God’s right hand, and you’ve got a host of people like those posting here to help bear you up.

    Congratulations.  If there’s a reaction, it means you scored a very palpable hit.

    • http://theeternaldance.blogspot.com/ Lynelle

      Agreed.  When I was still in my abusive church, we did whatever we were told.  ”don’t go to these websites, don’t read these books, say this if questioned  . . . ”

      Everything is based on fear.  The leadership is using its people to counter what they see as lies.
      If a person doesn’t go along with the group, there is fear of getting kicked out of the church, and therefore, losing ones salvation.
      (this is not said directly, but inferred by members)

      Elizabeth, they are the minority.  We are the majority.
      Even if we weren’t, you’d have nothing to fear.
      You are held safely in the hand of He who made you.

  • Elizabeth Cook

    THANK YOU for speaking up!!!  I’m sorry you are taking so much flak from this, but thank you, thank you, thank you!

  • Janice J

    Thank you, thank you, thank you for exposing this man, and standing up to him in such a public way. You spoke for thousands of us. We are in awe of your courage.

  • MC

    Thank you EE….Thank you.  May the Lord protect you and keep you.  I’m so proud of you!!

  • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

    Regarding what you said about fundamentalists baiting people with personal questions: YES. If you attempt to argue that their beliefs are harmful in any way, they decide to “witness” to you. In practice, this seems to mean asking deeply personal questions in order to get you to break down in some way and make yourself vulnerable. Bonus points if they can get you to start sobbing over some past trauma. That’s the goal. If they make you vulnerable and  maintain their composure, they can swoop in and take control of the situation – and dismiss you as “irrational” and “emotional.”

    • Anonymous

      Kristin: this is probably the best explanation of fundamentalist debate tactics I have ever read. It actually gave me chills because this is *precisely* how I was raised. Thank you.

      • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

        Wow, thank you. Honestly, I’ve had too many experiences to count that are like this with even with what I’d call “moderate” evangelical Christians. But it’s even more invasive (and abusive) with fundamentalists. And asking about your relationship with your parents – that’s definitely fundamentalist/Quiverfull.

        Whenever I debate with these people now, I do the same thing – refuse to answer any personal questions. I also make a point of keeping the conversation fact-based and pointedly ignoring the bait, as you did (I thought your becoming emotional on the show was a totally different thing.). Last week, I challenged some old friends on Facebook who were posting Islamophobic things about Butterball “Sharia turkeys,” and I just wouldn’t go in the direction they kept pushing. *They* were getting emotional. They kept going, “But these are my convictions!!!” But convictions aren’t any basis for an argument, and any of us can have whatever convictions we like and tell the world that god gave them to us.

        I’ve often fallen for it – becoming emotional because  of the manipulative tactics- but because I was able to stay calm and keep pushing in a measured – but firm – manner, I saw *them* get rattled for the first time. And it occurred to me: These people seem to hold their “convictions” in a very fragile place, if mere disagreement is experienced as attack/”spiritual warfare”/persecution. That was an important thing for me to see.

        • Verity3

          And that explains even more… wow. Just wow.

    • Verity3

      Thank you, Kristin. This gives me a lot of food for thought.

      I tend to take the open-book approach. I can be emotional and logical at the same time, and some things need to be talked about even if they are painful.

      But maybe I need to rethink that… for the bully’s sake if not for my own. (If they are perversely intent on slandering anyone who is emotional, then maybe it is no longer beneficial to continue the conversation. Maybe.) I still refuse to play the Calmest-Person-in-the-Room-Wins game… but maybe I should refuse to talk to them at all in certain cases? I hate the very idea, though. Going to have to ponder that one. *sigh*

  • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

    Also, I just read the critical piece about “biblical discipline” that you linked. I have to say: I think the term, “Biblical literalist,” rather like “Constitutionalist,” is more about using an old document to justify cruel behavior than it’s about what any document actually says or doesn’t say.

  • Revmegangray

    Thank you for speaking out against this very scary system of discipline. I recently finished Grace based parenting after you suggested it.
    It made me realize even more how thankful I am for Gods grace and my despite to show that grace to my children.

  • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

    Sorry for serial commenting. I keep thinking of things I left out… But I also wanted to point out: Yes, it was obvious that Anderson was biased against Pearl. And good for him! We should be biased against monstrous, destructive people, and it’s silly to pretend (I think) that there is some kind of reified thing called “objective journalism.” I don’t think there is any such thing as objective journalism.

    Second: I would have liked to have heard more from you and other critics on the show, *but* I think the time granted Pearl was productive in the sense that it gave him plenty of time, as we in the South, to “show his ass.” There was an audible collective gasp when Pearl suggested that raising children is the same as raising animals.  He didn’t do himself any favors. Like I said before: I think all but the most deeply indoctrinated (and hopefully even some of them) will see right through this.

    • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

      Er, even if it wasn’t audible, I saw everyone in the audience gasp in horror it when I watched. It *felt* audible.

      • Agnes

        I didn’t see the show, but him mentioning animals makes perfect sense.  Even the expression ‘training children’ gets my back up – you RAISE children, training is for dogs!

  • Bootsy328

    The real issue
    is that a couple of small changes may be necessary in the Pearl’s ministry and
    book…. clarify that infant discipline is a minor flick or swat to gain
    control over biting or fighting the placement of a diaper, and making sure all
    know that a spanking is NEVER a beating, nor should it ever be forcible enough
    to leave any marks. That being said, this whole issue has been placed on the
    Pearl’s back as if they are the scape goats for the abuse of children.

    We raised four
    kids the Pearl’s way, as a reasonable person would reasonably interpret what
    they teach. Our four kids all love the Lord and are terrific healthy adults. We
    never beat them, and spankings … which were swats …. disappeared by age
    6-8.

    Our college
    friends refused to discipline…. all are Christian couples, and each family
    has kids who are still undisciplined, children before marriage, and not walking
    with the Lord.

    Training up a
    child in the way they should go does not require spanking, but it also does not
    preclude it.

    Why do so many
    here call the Pearl’s horrible things when you do not even know them? They are
    godly, wonderful Christians who are on your team. Use moderation in your
    attacks and attack your disagreements, not the godly character of the man.

    • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

      Sorry, no. “Not leaving marks” is fundamentalism’s answer to child protective services, and *nothing* more than that.

    • Anonymous

      “Bootsy 328″: I am now blacklisting you. You will no longer be able to comment on my site. I have stood up for what I believe in using my real name, my face and my own words. You have hidden behind a pseudonym and issued passive-aggressive attacks on me and my readers. I call that cowardly behavior. I have always welcomed disagreement but I will not allow you to attack my readers or suggest I acted outside my “role” as a woman. You are no longer welcome to comment here.

    • Claire

      Lydia Schatz’ parents left no marks. That was (part of) the *problem* – they couldn’t see the damage they were doing :(

      • http://thehomespunlife.com Sisterlisa

        oh yes they did leave marks on her.

  • Steve Thomas

    I’ve never not shaken someone’s hand when it’s been offered, but I think if I’d have had the guts to even have walked out there and taken a seat on that sofa in the first place–disgusts me to say so but I deeply doubt I do–I would have only have been able to look at him and shake my head no.  “Huh-UH, buddy, ain’t no peace HERE.”

    I couldn’t have done what you did.

    I *know*, on the other hand, that if I’d been sitting out in the audience I’d have been the one standing on his *feet*, applauding at the end.  Can just barely believe everybody else just sat there. 

  • Crazymom13

    I claim no “authority” other than the reality that I have seen more kids who have been run over by cars than the average person has. Pediatric nurses dont discipline other peoples’ children, we learn to communicate effectively with them…as do we with our own children. So I dont claim to be more of an expert on discipline that the average person, but I have seen the effect of childhood accidents on children. You dont have to see too may 5 year old vent dependent quadriplegics to realize that you need to keep your kid from running into the street, even if it is at the cost of a spanking. 

    Im sorry you were abused. Im sorry your son was abused. It is admirable that you committed yourself to learning as much as possible about the issue to chose the best path for you and your son. 

    So each of us have life experiences that influence how we chose to discipline our kids. That is how life works, live and learn. Your life experience doesnt mean that my parenting of my children was wrong. 

    I am a loving, committed parent who never over-used physical punishment. My 3rd child was spanked twice in her life and as my sons are adults, I havent spanked anyone for a very long time and I may likely never do it again. I dont scream at them, I dont swear, belittle or call them names.  

    None of us advocate abuse, but we need to leave parents some reasonable latitude for how they discipline their children.

    • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

      “Right” and “wrong” are moral judgements. That wasn’t the point of my comment at all.

      Rather, if your goal is moral internalization (teach the child not to run into the street in the future so they restrain themselves) than corporal punishment is one of the least effective means you can choose to accomplish that goal. That’s not a moral judgment, that’s a statement of fact.

      The question then becomes, why do parents do something that’s ineffective at their stated goal? And why do they often perceive it as effective when it isn’t? (In other words, why do their perceptions fail to coincide with reality?) That’s another discussion, entirely.

      Here I was simply pointing out that your assertion of fact (that spanking a child is an effective means of teaching them not to run into the street in the future) was incorrect. That’s not a matter of opinion. That’s as close as you get to an established fact in behavioral science confirmed in multiple studies by lots of studies over the course of decades. Corporal punishment is pretty good at very short term behavior modification. It sucks at moral internalization.

      Heck, I even read a study from more than a decade ago (not available online as far as I know), that didn’t rely on parental reporting on the specific subject of ‘running into the street’. Instead, they used a control group of parents who reported using spanking to correct that behavior (and controlled for as many factors as they could). And then they taught a study group of parents a relatively simple and straightforward disciplinary approach to teach their small children not to run into the street. Then they observed both sets of families as they were outside under similar conditions for similar periods of time each day over the course of a  period of time. (It was something like 2 weeks or a month.)

      Over that period of time, the control group of kids who were spanked showed little or no reduction in their attempts to run into the street. The group that was effectively disciplined very quickly fell to almost no attempts to run into the street.

      The same study did ask the parents questions designed to determine their perception of the effectiveness of their disciplinary approach. And this was the strange part. The study group correctly perceived the effectiveness of the approach they used. However, the group of parents who spanked also reported that they perceived that their efforts were effective and significantly under-reported the number of times their children tried to run into the street.

      That’s a good illustration why our perceptions of effectiveness — without objective measures — are not particularly trustworthy. Heck, Michael Pearl perceives his approach as effective.

      And I’m not particularly interested in sympathy for myself or my son (who’s doing pretty well for himself with a family of his own now). I was just explaining why I motivated to actually learn what works and what doesn’t when it comes to discipline.

      And corporal punishment doesn’t work in any of the areas I care about, and which I believe most parents care about, when it comes to disciplining children. (Even when compliance — short term behavior modification — matters, which isn’t very often, there are other approaches to achieve it that don’t have the negative outcome correlations of corporal punishment.)

      • Anonymous

        Dude, Scott. This comment brings a whole new meaning to “having the last word.” More like: “having the last dissertation!” :)

  • Nancy

    My breath was short and my heart was pounding as I watched this clip — I can remember having those same feelings when I spoke truth to a past abuser in my own life.  You are being so courageous, and managing to be articulate and clear at the same time.

    And as for those who argue that their kids turn out fine — one of my parents was an alcoholic, and we turned out “fine” too.  But we turned out okay *despite* the alcoholic parenting, not because of it.  If it hadn’t been for other healthy families, teachers, and a wonderful church I found when I was 21, I would be another statistic of one kind or another. 

    I will be cheering you on when the station in my city airs the program!

  • http://twitter.com/kristinrawls Kristin Rawls

    Completely agree. It’s a system far-removed even from empathy and compassion, which should always be a red flag.

  • Lktate

    I’ve only seen the clip shown above (from John Cornish) — I want to say that I’m glad that you were calm and collected and that you ignored Pearl’s bait. Thanks for speaking out! You’re saying things that absolutely need to be said.

  • MC

    p.s.  I am so encouraged by your last line.  ”Be not afraid. Love never fails.”  Amen.  I don’t know if you have ever heard Andrew Peterson’s song “After the last tear falls”…but it is amazing and leaves me with tears of hope and joy after every listening.  Hope you find it encouraging too!

  • http://NancyRCarter.com Nancy

    I liked how you said: “Here’s the thing: I know how to be gracious and remain composed. But I also have boundaries. And my boundary that day was to refuse a personal, buddy-buddy conversation with Michael Pearl.”

    I have an abusive person in my life and I know just how much pain, healing, & growth that it takes to even get to the point where you can be gracious & composed in their presence. And I applaud you sticking to your boundary of not faking the buddy-buddy stuff. Well done.

  • http://www.truth-makes-freedom.blogspot.com/ Katherine Gunn

    Awesome job, Elizabeth. Yes, you are being heard. Your voice is helping many see clearly who were confused. But even if you voice only saved one child from being raised in hell, it would be worth it. Thank you for adding your strong voice to this conversation.

  • Sharon

    Well done! I can see how hard that was for you.  You were very clear.  God bless

  • Toni Gatlin

    I applaud your courage, and was awed– AWED– at how you looked him in the eye, stayed perfectly calm, and spoke so eloquently on behalf of the children wounded by the Pearls. Great is your reward in heaven. :-)

  • Guest

    I just watched that clip, and my whole body ached when you walked on the stage.  I can only imagine how you must have felt.  You were so brave.  You spoke so calmly.  Thank you for speaking out.  Thank you for being brave. 

  • http://www.emergingmummy.com Sarah@EmergingMummy

    I am just so unbelievably impressed, EE. Tip of the hat, my dear. You were/are brilliant.

  • Donna

    I am so proud of you! Thank you for your sweet strength. =)

  • Elizabeth L.

    Thank you for being so brave. I think it takes incredible strength to   openly discuss that you were at one time convinced of the rightness of this sort of teaching. I believe your honesty and activism will rescue many people.

  • Lucie

    Elizabeth, I did not see the interview due to being at work, but I wanted to commend you for your courage and persistence.  It is my hope that they will bear fruit.

  • Greg

    Elizabeth,  Just like you couldn’t keep quiet about your feelings, nor can I, so I hope you consider my words.   Yes, I am very saddened by the children who have suffered and died due to warped parents.  I am also saddened by the way you are causing so much division and sowing seeds of hatred towards other Christians.  I understand how you can strongly disagree with Michael Pearl’s interpretation of scripture, but to resort to venomous name calling and hate speech is really sad. 

    My wife and I have most of the Pearl’s books and know others who have too.  We are not Fundamentalists, yet we appreciate the Pearls desire to help parents with child raising.  We disagree with their approach, but they are like dozens of respected Christian teachers/leaders/authors who believe that spanking with a rod is biblical.  They would disagree as to the method, but they believe it is supported by the Bible.

    We have had discussions and disagreements with our friends as to the best approach to parenting, but we all agree that the Pearls are Christians that deserve respect like others with whom we disagree.

    The Pearls give so much of their time and money to helping people, that to talk about them as if they were cold-hearted murderers is just wrong.

    Please, Elizabeth, I know you have been wounded by many Fundamentalist teachings, but please look in the mirror.  Realize that you may be so hurt, that just like the abused child, you have grown up to abuse others in a different sort of way.

    Please pray for the Pearls and bring correction where you feel it’s needed.  But to villify Michael Pearl the way you have isn’t productive.

    Greg 

    • Anonymous

      Greg: how am I supposed to *seriously* consider your words when you accuse me of: “sowing seeds of hatred,” “venomous name calling” and “hate speech”? Really? Not only is that just plain dishonest, it’s downright ridiculous.

      Exactly WHERE have I name-called? Exactly WHERE have I engaged in “hate speech”?

      Nowhere that’s where.

      Thank you for proving my point that Pearl supporters have nothing to offer except intellectual dishonesty.

      • Greg

        Elizabeth,  You are right … I read through your posts more carefully and see that you aren’t really engaging in hate speech.  I apologize for that.  You did personally attack Mr. Pearl by saying things like: “There is only stubborn, prideful defensiveness and a kind of cruel heartlessness.”  I think Mr. Pearl has a heart for children, just like you. He just see things differently.

        The way you describe Fundamentalism does seem hateful.  But again, I should have toned it down.  That was dishonest of me to write those things. 
        I still think your attacks on Pearl are divisive and wrong.  The media loves this type of thing.  It really makes Christians that believe the Bible literally (using the rod for correction), look like dangerous nuts.

        I appreciate your zeal for the defenseless, that shows the heart of God.  May God bless you and your family.

        Peace,  Greg

    • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

      I don’t simply “disagree” with the Pearl’s methods. The things they teach are frank child abuse and if parents truly follow everything they teach from infancy up, those parents are abusing their kids — even if they don’t end up killing them. They may skate the line and avoid legal culpability for their abuse, but that’s about it. In fact, a better sub-title for their work might be, “How to abuse your kids within the letter of the law.”

  • Agnes

    You. are. my. hero.  Brave doesn’t even begin to describe it.  Screams and cheers from this corner.  SPEAK.

  • Incongruous Circumspection

    You NAILED it!  WOW!  I am so durn impressed.  And not only were you wicked awesome in your points, you looked gorgeous doing it to!

  • Anonymous

    You are a better person than I am. I seriously would have kicked that ugly old douche bag in the teeth. He is a purely evil SOB. I have seen him react to the deaths of the kids his books teachings have caused and he shows no hint of remorse. I truly believe he is racking up all kinds of bad karma and will pay for it dearly in the afterlife. Good for you for standing up to that waste of air.  

  • Emily

    Elizabeth, I have to say that your concern for these children and their families is so compelling.  Thank you for being willing to mourn with Jesus over the loss of these precious lives.

    I’m wondering what Michael Pearl really intends to accomplish by these appearances. I doubt anyone in the audience was on his side after his cold, calculated descriptions of disciplinary tactics. Is he just there to gloat? Frankly, I think if you wrote a detailed book that requires even MORE explanation so that people don’t KILL children using your ideas,  you’re probably either a super poor communicator or your ideas are wrong. All that defense of his ideas and no heartbreak over the abuse!

    And yet, he never describes how to use his techniques and NOT be abusive, just restates that they’re NOT abusive if used properly…gah. My mind is going in circles trying to figure this out. Are they not abusive as long as you don’t leave marks? Are his sessions not abusive as long as the child becomes obedient? Or shows signs of “breaking”?? Are his sessions not abusive as long as the child doesn’t die??? WTF.

    Okay, now I’m just really upset again.

    I was spanked based on his principles (repetition, fear, will breaking, etc, though not with the plumbing line) and I am NOT a better person for it. I wish that my parents had chosen to engage with me about consequences for actions rather than spanking. I was a good, logical kid, I would have listened.  Instead, I have emotional scars. It was easier to forgive my parents when I remember those spanking sessions when they were upset or angry, but it’s the calm, emotionless ones that I can’t get out of my head.

    I am a decent, respectful, diligent person now IN SPITE of Michael Pearl’s methods, not because of them.

    Elizabeth, thank you again for sharing your story and speaking up so well. You are very brave.

  • Lynn

    I haven’t read any other comments yet, but I have to say that your eloquence in that clip just took my breath away.  Every word you said was appropriate and necessary.  No fluff, no emotionalism, nothing left out.  Just fabulous.  Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    You did exactly right by not responding to his question about your parenting habits.  He was just trying to throw you off balance by making it personal.  I was amazed at your ability to stay calm and get your message across.

  • Rd-gas

    I commend you for your work. I wish I knew better how to speak out on this issue. I have 4 children , 2 of which are still suffering the pain of an abusive church and school. Sometimes my stomach gets nauseated and I become weak when I hear certain Preachers. Many of my former church friends actually seem to get a high on the hard core exclusive preaching and feel they are so holy. Then I feel guilty because they make me sick. I hope Mr. Pearl weeps someday for the damage he has done. I feel utter disgust for his teaching. Can you believe I am 62 years old and it has taken me years to overcome the effects of Fundamentalism. I still do not like church and have a great deal of doubt that God loves us. anyone who spanks an infant should be jailed.I recently sat in a fundamentalist childrearing session where they taught  how important it was to let your little baby cry, do not move valuable things so that if the baby continued to touch,he or she should be spanked. I felt hate  and also dizzy and weak. I do not think I will ever be well, but I do hope in the Lord.I thank you for your work. my passion and #1 cause is child abuse, and child neglect,abandonment and victimazation.It is a constant pain in my heart and my forever prayer request. I do not like to say I hate anyone but I wish the Pearls could be spanked according to their policy.

  • http://twitter.com/stephsday stephsday

    So proud of you, Elizabeth. Thanks for being a voice for children everywhere.

  • Rochgirl

    The look on your face after you shook his hand is priceless. 

  • Verity3

    Before I finish reading all the comments, I just want to say, EE you are awesome. Thank you for standing up for the defenseless.

  • Verity3

    Eric, at the risk of appearing to disagree with you (I agree with your main point), EE did not establish dialogue, which is a conversation… her direct confrontation was technically monologue. But I agree with the point that the situation did not call for a Matthew 18:15 approach.

    True dialogue is impossible with someone who, because of the position they occupy (or believe they occupy), is convinced that they *must* not listen to you, learn from you, or appear to be swayed by you… for the sake of God’s “order,” for the sake of their “obedience” to God, and for the sake of your “edification.” The most you can hope for is monologue from *them* with an appearance of interaction.

    I am starting to think that attempting to reason with such a person in such a situation may simply feed their religious addictions. The best thing that could happen to Michael Pearl would be for him to lose his position of influence — in the marketplace, in the church, and in his family –forcing him to choose whether to pursue true interaction with other human beings, all of whom are created in God’s image.

    (EE, I believe you chose the right approach. And I’m a dialogue junkie. Thank you for modeling wisdom.)

  • Zzubadoo

    I just looked up the word fundamentalist. Apparantly I would be referred to as one. I do believe the bible is to be taken literally. And as a “fundamentalist” I want to add that I am not okay with the Pearls teachings. They are twisting a lot of scripture. And I just want to comment that I really like so much of what you write on your blog! But I am saddened that so many commenting, and maybe you too perhaps, are putting us “fundamentalists” is a box :( . I love Jesus, I love my husband and kids, I’m proud to have served in the United States Marine Corps, and I consider being a mom one of the highest honors I’ve ever been given. And for whatever box that puts me in, I just want to say

  • Zzubadoo

    Continued…I just want to say that I’m so sorry that you and others were hurt :( . I sure hope it doesn’t make all churches bad. I sure hope it doesn’t make Jesus bad :( .