Redeeming the word “Religion”

Growing up Christian fundamentalist, I often said religion was a man-made set of rules. I didn’t believe in religion, I said. I believed in a  relationship with God.

But this was a false dichotomy. Attempting to sunder Christian relationship from Christian religion leads to a sort of spiritual nihilism: a belief that any established Christian traditions are abstractly contrived, that traditional, ancient forms of Christian worship do not have intrinsic value.

This was what frustrated me about modern Protestantism. I spent six years wandering through Protestant churches before coming home to Catholicism. What I found during those six years was a sundering and splintering that had gone on so long, heresy was mainstream.

It no longer mattered what you believed about Christianity so long as it was true to you. Experience trumped everything. There was no need for creeds, fasts, holy days of obligation. It was your relationship, you decide what’s relevant to you. Except not really. Because it had already been decided that the Eucharist, Mary and the creeds were totally irrelevant.

Which is to say, it wasn’t until our family began attending a traditional Presbyterian church that I heard the Nicene Creed for the first time ever.

As a small example of how far splintered Protestantism is, I recently met a pastor in a coffee shop who had left his church to start a new church (his former church was also a split-off from another church). This pastor told me he centered his services around… improvisational comedy skits. No worship. No communion. Just comedy skits. Which I gives a whole new meaning to the phrase “bring in the clowns.”

To my mind, this is not healthy reproduction where a good tree bears much fruit. This is bad reproduction, the kind that happens when you make xerox copies from a bad copy–all subsequent versions becoming more grainy, less true reflections of the original.

In the 70′s and 80′s it was all the rage to leave mainline denominations and reinvent the Christian wheel. The odd irony is that non-denominational churches have become their own denominations with the same kind of triumphal, stifling pride they accused traditional denominations of having. It doesn’t surprise me that the meanest and most hateful emails I’ve ever received are from devotees of Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa.

I now believe it’s a staggering act of hubris to reinvent the wheel of Christianity and even toss out words like “religion.” We’ve reinvented the wheel so much it hardly even resembles a wheel anymore. Hello, comedy skits as church.

The thing is, I’m also guilty of reinventing my own Catholicism. I am not a very consistent, good Catholic. I take the birth control pill. I don’t get to Sunday Mass as much as I should. I am horrible at fasting and am easily annoyed by purist Catholics who make Catholicism inaccessible to outsiders.

Still, I revere the constraints of Catholicism. It gives me the structure within which to work out my salvation and my relationship with God.

In a lot of ways I’m like a pinball shot out of the spring-loaded chamber. I am wildly inconsistent. The vagaries of my human nature often get the best of me. But the lanes and channels of the pinball machine keep me in line. Which is to say, it’s far better for my soul that I am wildly inconsistent within the “man-made” lanes of Catholicism than out on my own, trying to reinvent ways of relating to God.

For me, the word “religion” has been redeemed. The great gifts of Catholicism are the lanes and channels by which I develop my relationship with God. Catholicism is a very human religion, meaning: Catholicism aids my humanity by giving me touch, sight, taste, smell, feeling. Catholicism doesn’t ask me to be a disembodied spirit. It stoops to my humanity. I’ve become far more human inside Catholicism than in all my years outside it.

Yes, there are obligations in this religion just like there are obligations in relationship. Despite widespread claims, I’ve discovered that religion and relationship are not mutually exclusive.

Even the most authentic, genuine relationship will suffer if it is neglected. A relationship is a living thing and cannot go without attention, love and….obligation. True love is sacrifice. Jesus said, “greater love has no one more than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.” (St. John 15:13)

Entering the Catholic Church was a painful, difficult sacrifice for me. I went alone. I went kicking and screaming. But the Eucharist and Mary were worth every sacrifice. Indeed, going alone and remaining alone are crosses I gladly bear because love has redeemed religion.

And religion has become one of the sweetest, purest words I’ve ever known.

This entry was posted in Catholicism. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://cuppboard.blogspot.com Elizabeth Erazo


    Catholicism is a very human religion, meaning: Catholicism aids my humanity by giving me touch, sight, taste, smell, feeling. Catholicism doesn’t ask me to be a disembodied spirit. Itstoops to my humanity. I’ve become far more human inside Catholicism than in all my years outside it.”

    ^So beautiful. ♥

  • Ave Maria

    Bravo!!! Well said!

  • http://www.4andcounting.blogspot.com nicole_asmanyasgiven

    Love this! You have said some of my very thoughts, only much more clearly.

  • http://www.ayoungmomsmusings.blogspot.com/ Melissa@Permission to Live

    I guess this is why I am agnostic right now. “reinventing
    ways of relating to God” doesn’t make sense to me either, it feels like I’m
    pretending to have an imaginary friend.  But I don’t think I can fit into the “man-made”
    lanes of most of Christianity. It sounds beautiful, but lately I’ve begun to feel that the sacrifice
    required for me to fit into the Christian box is too great, and not worth it for a God
    I am not even sure exists. And it makes me wonder why so many christian groups insist that God requires something I cannot bring myself to give.

  • Jennifer

    Substitute Orthodoxy for Catholicism and you have my experience as well.

  • Rachel

    What do you say to people who have experiences similar to your childhood experiences within the Church an as a result Catholicism hold only soul crushing pain, guilt and condemnation?

    • Rachel

      I meant to say that they had childhood experiences that were similar to your childhood experiences, only those experiences occurred within the Catholic church and as a result as adults 
      Catholicism hold only soul crushing pain, guilt and condemnation.

      • Anonymous

        Such a good question! Ultimately, my preeminent belief is in the unconditional love of God. And as such, I’m confident that love can reach a soul anywhere–outside or inside Catholicism. I know there are many Catholics who’ve been hurt by the Church and I utterly empathize with them. Perhaps for them the sound of liturgical music strikes the same kind of PTSD that hearing hymns does for me. I say go wherever you find the love of God. :) xo.

  • Peony Moss

    Bravo.  The very word “religion” comes from a word for “reconnection” – it MEANS relationship.

    (and taking the Pill for medical reasons doesn’t make you a Bad Catholic!)

  • http://loveiswhatyoudo.wordpress.com/ Jessica

    I think the word “religiosity” is a good one to insert into this conversation. I have real problems with religiosity, with affected piety that is separated from its true motivation or intention (I realize there are other connotations to this word, that’s the one I mean.) I think Jesus spent most of his time knocking down religiosity among contemporary Pharisees who forgot the point of their rituals. When that rapper and others criticize “religion,” I think they are criticizing an allegiance to religious actions that is fake, affected, or hypocritical. But to make it about religion, not religiosity, means they’re lumping that  together with the religious practices, sacraments, and rituals that are intended to increase our understanding of and relationship with Christ.

    • Anonymous

      Religiosity. Yes, indeed. Not to be confused with “true” religion. Thank you, Jessica.

  • Vosslers

    I think there is so much beauty to this and I love the thought of reclaiming the word “religion”. I guess my original thoughts still stand … the word is also used to describe self-righteousness, manmade rules, adding extras to what God has said.

  • Michael Mullady

    Thank you so much for this! I think every time I feel like I’m failing at being a good Catholic I get inspiration to go on.  This was ccertainly this for me today. 

  • Sabahmom

    “Lanes of Catholicism” … hmmm. That is a picture that makes sense to me, EE. My “word” for this new year is “SPACIOUSNESS”. I love that it implies room enough to do whatever it is that I want or need to do. Room to grow, to be, to expand, to breathe! To invite others into. To be creative. I am so longing for that. But I find myself picturing a room or a house with many rooms when I think of this word – not the vast, wide open spaces. This picture of Catholicism fits that. Please keep writing. I’ll keep reading.

    • Anonymous

      I’m glad it’s a word picture that helps. :) I’m know it’s a weak analogy, but it’s the one that came to mind when I was thinking of myself as something of a loose canon! :)

  • Mark S.

    EE, please pray for me. I have “purist” catholic tendencies that I battle against, finding the splinter in someone’s eye and missing the board in my own. I am a work in progress and the Catholic church stoops so low to grace someone like me.

  • Katie the immigrant

    Yet again I find myself musing about how glad I am to have found this blog. So thought-provoking. I too have been taught that religion is a bad word, but as other commenters have said, religiosity is the true issue. As a child, I was Protestant, but my best friends were Catholic. I was so jealous. The liturgy appealed to me. And I really wanted to wear a pretty First Communion dress. Hubby and I now attend a baptist church, but we are highly Catholic-friendly and often discuss how much we appreciate about the Catholic church, especially in light of the problems plaguing other denominations, a la EE’s photocopy analogy. Wow that was a long sentence. Anyway. Who knows? We may one say find ourselves in mass, too.

    • Katie the immigrant

      One day, not one say. :-p

    • Katie the immigrant

      One day, not one say. :-p

    • Katie the immigrant

      One day, not one say. :-p

  • Holly

    You speak so many of my own thoughts.  How many, many years did I automatically respond to the word “religion” with that same catch-phrase…”Christianity isn’t a religion, it’s a relationship.”  But what a confusing relationship it was…with so many splinters over so many different details it became exhausting to try and find somewhere that I could fit it…which translates that I felt like I could believe like they did.  The last Protestant church I visited was giving out door prizes and happy meals to encourage attendance.   I went home and wept.
    My own journey has been like the prodigal son, out wandering making my own decisions about what I did or did not believe about God; creating my own designer theology and trying to find a church that fit it.
    I am tired of wandering, weary of making my own decisions about what to believe.  I am on my road home, and will be received into the Catholic church at Easter…and I’m so happy to simply relax into my Father’s arms and let Him and His “religion” be my home. 

  • Anonymous

    Elizabeth, according to Church teaching you can use the birth control pill for medical reasons.  So I don’t see how that makes you a bad Catholic.  However, there is much division in the Catholic Church about Church teaching.  Different interpretations. Different understandings.  Some will tell you that you are going to hell for using the BCP for medical reasons even if it is saving your life or enabling you to care for your children.

    I don’t experience unity as adherence to the same doctrine or by say everyone not eating fish on Fridays during lent.  Don’t get me wrong, I love the structure and the tangible expressions of the sacred the Church gives us.  I just do not see the unity in everyone believing the same thing because there is much disagreement.  And everyone uses the catechism to prove their point.

    If someone was raised in the Catholic Church and had a horrific experience then it is possible improv comedy skits about God could bring them healing and a deeper understanding of God.  A step on the way to a deeper relationship.  I wouldn’t discount it as meaningless.

  • Anonymous

    Elizabeth, according to Church teaching you can use the birth control pill for medical reasons.  So I don’t see how that makes you a bad Catholic.  However, there is much division in the Catholic Church about Church teaching.  Different interpretations. Different understandings.  Some will tell you that you are going to hell for using the BCP for medical reasons even if it is saving your life or enabling you to care for your children.

    I don’t experience unity as adherence to the same doctrine or by say everyone not eating fish on Fridays during lent.  Don’t get me wrong, I love the structure and the tangible expressions of the sacred the Church gives us.  I just do not see the unity in everyone believing the same thing because there is much disagreement.  And everyone uses the catechism to prove their point.

    If someone was raised in the Catholic Church and had a horrific experience then it is possible improv comedy skits about God could bring them healing and a deeper understanding of God.  A step on the way to a deeper relationship.  I wouldn’t discount it as meaningless.

    • Janet

      Yes, I agree with Beth – there is so much division in the Catholic Church.  I grew up in the pre-Vatican II Council days, and as a 6-year-old child was told that if I missed one Mass or ate meat on 1 Friday, this would send me to hell forever if I did not get to confession before I died.  This was the basic belief  at that time (along with a laundry list of other sins that could send you straight to hell…) until the changes came through the Council.  I grew up believing I WAS a  “disembodied spirit”, and now, as a middle-aged woman, I find it hard to shake a lot of the hideous things I was taught about God and His vengeance, even though I had my own personal and mystical experience of Christ.  This was religon at its worst.

      So I am astonished when I hear that my formerly Protestant friend has become Catholic, but makes a casual decision that he will not attend Mass any given Sunday. I am actually envious of him and of you, because you know that you will not burn in hell forever for skipping Mass!   I know that there are conservative Catholics who still believe in the traditional way, and there are also Catholics and priests who quietly follow their own consciences and remain Catholic.  I have had to take hiatuses from the Mass for periods of time, because attending often brings up post-traumatic stress feelings. 

      But I always wind up returning, because the Eucharist and Mary (and especially, Christ) are worth every sacrifice.

      • Anonymous

        I understand Janet.  My mom grew up with that and it would have been better for her if she were never Catholic.  She was never able to develop a healthy relationship with God.  I sigh when I hear Catholics say they want to go back to the pre-Vatican II days as if they were glory days.  I honestly have never met a person who was raised in that generation that was not given anything besides what you stated above.  I’ve met people who memorized the Baltimore catechism (as my mother did) but never really knew or lived a deep realtionship with God.

  • KatR

    I find this fascinating primarily because I had to go in the exact opposite direction to find healing from spiritual abuse. I did have to reinvent my own way of relating to God, which is why I’m now an Episcopalian who talks to Mary. :) I’ve had to cobble together bits and pieces of old and new in order to have a spiritual life.

    Maybe comedy skit guy is relating to God in the only way he can. Or maybe he’s just an oddball. Hard to know in that kooky California. ;)

  • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

    “Send in the clowns. Don’t bother. They’re here.”

    Echoes of the music of my mom forming the landscape of my childhood. I, perhaps, empathized too much with certain songs for all my “tender years.” Hah.

    Not what you meant, but the odd connection my mind made with your post. And oddly fitting. If you search for the song, check out the Judy Collins version. It’s the one seared in my memory.

  • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

    I’m also reminded of a youth camp a few years ago when I was a volunteer youth worker at our church. I think my small group was mostly senior guys that year. I don’t particularly recall the subject matter, but the false dichotomy between religion and “true” Christianity was in there somehow and it was on the list of questions we were supposed to go over. (I’ve never been particularly good at adhering to “guides” in such discussions, but our then student pastor is a good friend of mine and he kinda liked that about me. He probably wouldn’t have written those particular questions, anyway. They came from the camp speaker.)

    I got to that question, read it the group, and then just said something like, “OK guys, most of you have grown up in this church, maybe you can explain to me exactly what point they are trying to make, because it sounds like nothing but some kind of word game to me. If you look up the definition of religion, Christianity certainly seems to meet the definition. When we’re discussing world religions, Christianity is always on the list. We can discuss ways that Christianity is different from other religions, certainly, but why do people want to assert that it’s not a religion?” An interesting discussion ensued. (I do that sort of thing a lot. And oddly, several of their parents, who are also friends, told me their sons had told them those discussions had meant a lot to them. Go figure.)

    The only thing you really accomplish when you redefine language is that you end up speaking a secret code that’s unintelligible to those who aren’t in on the redefinition.

  • Zeckle

    We all are guilty of making Christ over in our own image. You can hear it a lot in famous Protestant pastors. As a Wesleyan/Methodist, I like to hold in balance the experience and tradition. We have not come to our faith by way of a vacuum. None of us can come to the Bible without the voices of past pastors and theologians who have shaped our spiritual world view. I can only come knowing that I am influenced by Luther, Wesley, Augustine. And so throwing out religion is something impossible for us to do.  
    But I cannot discount experience either. There is a dance between experience, tradition and Scripture and reason (God I am so Wesleyan) that we need to do. Scripture and tradition shapes, informs, and filters our experience and reason. But without experience and reason, we are living out someone else’s faith. Without Scripture and tradition, we are creating a faith based on our own likes and dislikes, what moves us.
    All that to say, great post. I appreciate your words so much.

  • Tina

    I was part of a group of people that did just that.  We left the organized church we belonged to and worshiped in an independent house church.  We went from a church movement steeped in legalism and control to a “do/believe whatever you want” movement.  Both extremes were unhealthy.  Right before we got married, I told my husband I wanted out.  We’re now back in an “organized” church, which I think is better for us.

  • http://wellthoughtoutlife.blogspot.com/ Kacie

    not a Catholic, still a Protestant, but totally agree with much of your critique of the attitude towards mainstream, structured, historical religion.

    Love history, creeds, structure, sacraments. Love. I think so much of what we see in the American church comes from our individualistic culture. Everything is for “me”. It’s built into our government – which is for the purpose of preserving our individual life, liberty, and happiness. So we think our religion should do the same.

  • http://www.facebook.com/caren.green Caren Green

    Just found your blog today, and I’m already linking back to it in from my page. I’m a recovered Baptist fundamentalist, and I’ve read several of your posts and you seem to have a great perspective and a nice style.

  • Claudia Ritter

    I appreciate your willingness to be vulnerable and incredibly honest about your experiences. I admire many Catholic traditions and find myself sometimes yearning for a more traditional sabbath day structure. I am part of a denominational church, so we operate under a plurality of elders within our congregation; there is a hierarchy of leadership. However, we are pretty much your standard modern evangelical Christian church. Doctrine is not terribly solid (yet – we now have a young senior pastor who is influenced by reformed theology) and there is a lot of modern influence in our services. Just a little background on where I’m coming from.

    What you’re saying can be tough for some Protestants to hear and sometimes tough things must be said (I’m not against that), but I noticed that you mentioned a particular church in your entry: “It doesn’t surprise me that the meanest and most hateful emails I’ve
    ever received are from devotees of Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa.”

    Have you responded or felt the need to respond to any of these individuals that sent mean emails? Or perhaps contacted leadership about it? If this much hate is coming from one particular congregation, I believe what they’re preaching/teaching should come into question in a direct way. Would I be wrong in interpreting Matthew 18:15-17 and applying it here?

  • http://the-peripatetic-papers.blogspot.com/ Atmospheric

    Well said. However, I still believe that religion is a man-made construct. It may well begin with things like divinely given texts and sacraments, but the longer man as stewardship of it, the more perverted and less divine it tends to become. I too also admire the Presbyterians. I too also agree with your central premise (if I understand it correctly) that you can’t just make up the rules as you go along. I think the relationship is still the more important thing; it’s just not the ONLY thing.

  • http://kansasbob.com Kansas Bob

    Enjoyed the read Elizabeth. I guess my response is a bit of an overstatement. I will say it anyways: “In my view religion is what separates us from each other”.

    For years I attended mass with my wife and could not share communion with her simply because I was not a Roman Catholic. 

    In my Pentecostal season there was a definite delineation between those who spoke in tongues and those who didn’t.

    In my Fundie years the consumption of a glass of wine was strictly forbidden – especially for leaders like me.

    Religion always seems to be accompanied by rules. Sometimes the rules and traditions are helpful but many times they just get in the way of bringing people together.

    Guess I say all that to simply say that religion is great as long as you are a member of the religion and adhere to its tenets. But for those on the outside there is no love offered but only an invitation to come, be like us and join our group. So, while I like some of what you say I do not find religion to be somethings unites but rather something that divides. And maybe that is simply the way it has to be?

  • Bpbasilphx

    \ This pastor told me he centered his services around… improvisational comedy skits. No worship. No communion. Just comedy skits.\

    It’s called “liturtainment.” This is where I saw protestant worship going 30 years go with “Children’s Church” and puppet shows.

    **But I don’t think I can fit into the “man-made”
    lanes of most of Christianity.**
    What makes you think they are man-made, Melissas?