Since when did LITTLE GIRL dance competitions turn into booty-grinding, skankerdoodle stripaloozas?

My ballerina performed in a big dance competition last weekend. I was expecting fierce ballet rivalry but her team scored a few top awards. Why? Two simple reasons: 1. They’re good and, 2. 99% of the competing dances were a glut of skanked-out, booty-shaking, hooker grinding strip-a-paloozas.

I mean, the sheer lack of serious ballet competitors certainly made my ballerina’s team stand out–but so what? They competed against a boatload of crap. Where’s the glory in that? It wasn’t difficult to pick out the dancers who relied on skill and technique vs. the dancers who relied on fishnet stockings and shaking it like a Polaroid picture.

Even so, there was a sense of validation in knowing dance judges still appreciate old-school classical dance and that proper ballet training still matters.

Gauging from what I saw, a whole lotta parents are prepping their daughters for thriving careers…in strip clubs. You know, just making their (Pimp) Daddy proud!

I was so astonished by the wolf-whistles and cat-calls coming from parents in the audience that couldn’t help but wonder: am I totally out of touch?

I mean, I had no idea that pimping out a five year-old in hooker getup was–as I overheard a doting mother call it– “cute.” In my book that’s not cute, that’s called child exploitation. But if I dare question costume choice or butt-grinding moves, I’m called “pretentious,” “prudish” and my personal favorite: “elitist.” Yes, elitist.

This is where we are today, folks: refraining from shaking your ass in the audience’s face is elitist.

BA HA HA.

What really amuses me, though, are people who ask me if I ever worry about my ballerina because, you know, ballet is so strict. Why, yes. I’m very worried about my daughter’s aversion to booty-grinding. It keeps me up at night, har har.

You know what truly worries me? Watching a troupe of 8 year old little girls slap their grinding behinds while winking at the audience over their shoulders. I’m supposed to applaud this? I feel like I should be calling Child Protective Services.

What’s next? Kindergartners swinging on strip poles?

Hey, I have an idea. Why don’t we just lay out the welcome mat for every single pedophile within a 50 mile radius and invite them to come snap pictures of our gussied-up baby girls winking at them?

After watching a veritable parade of strip-teasing, it was a blessed relief to watch my ballerina’s team perform with elegance, grace and skill.

Last time she attended a competition, a dance judge approached our team and expressed her joy at watching “real, classical ballet.” In fact, she gave my ballerina’s team The Judge’s Award.

When this weekend’s show was finally over and we were driving home, my ballerina and her friend were discussing the dismissive remarks they’d heard other dancers say about ballet. Ballet, they’d been told, was boring. Like, yawn. Like, OMG, whatevs.

“They have no idea how hard it is to do a fuette,” my ballerina said.

Aye, there’s the rub. Ballet is hard. In fact, it’s damn near impossible. It requires years of training, years of discipline, years of sold-out commitment. There’s no immediate gratification in ballet. Furthermore, a ballet career is short and it probably won’t make you rich (at least, in America).

Booty-shaking, by comparison, is easy. Anyone can shake what their Mama gave them. And yeah, maybe you’ll get thunderous applause and wolf-whistles. You might even get rich–of course, you’ll be easily forgotten.

After all, if you’ve seen one butt, you’ve seen ‘em all.

Ballet, however, offers something exquisitely rare: the opportunity–however fleeting–to create shimmering moments of immortal art. 

Ballet elevates humanity. It never debases or dehumanizes. The very effort and discipline of dancing ballet–even if never danced professionally–is a quest for something worthy, noble and truly beautiful.

So, let them call you pretentious. Let them call you elitist. And boring.
Just keep tying those pointe shoes, sweetheart.

Because history rarely remembers the revelers of raunch, the peddlers of putridity.

But true art lasts forever.

This entry was posted in Ballet. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.peanutbutterinmyhair.com Melissa

    I LOVE THIS.

    I totally agree. There are very few dance troops around anymore that teach dance and not booty…it’s sad. Your daughter is gorgeous and I hope she goes far pursing her fine art. 

  • http://www.findingfruit.blogspot.com/ Jen

    It is frustrating that when I make a more conservative choice for my children I am being called judgmental. I mean I am totally judging them but all in my head. I would never say it out loud. But you are right. It needs to be said. I see the pictures of my friends’ kids on Facebook in their cheerleading uniforms and I cringe. As a former cheerleader and former cheer coach, I cringe to see little girls midriffs showing. I love the sport but there is something really wrong about how we are letting young girls be presented to the world. 

    • Lucie

      There’s a time and place for being judgmental, IMHO.

  • KatR

    I saw a story on HBO’s “Real Sports” about cheerleading competitions. Same thing, little girls (I’m talking elementary age) with make up two inches thick, demonstrating for the reporter what they call “facials”. Facials are the winks and pursed lips that these little girls throw the judges. Neither the coach or the parents showed much concern with 8 year old girls being taught to flirt with grown men. They know the difference between this and real life, was the argument they used. Even if that is the case, in what universe is it ok to put lipstick and eyeshadow on a little girl and teach her how to act seductive towards adults? Unreal. 

    • http://www.gatebeautiful.ca bekka

       I shudder at the thought of teaching such young girls these “skills”.  And what are they actually learning?  That you can manipulate people with your looks and behaviour?  Yes, that’s so healthy *eyeroll*.

    • Retha Faurie

      I agree, but isn’t cheerleading suspect per se? It is all about girls cheering boys from the sidelines, as if women exist to praise men. It seems to me that flirting is a close sister of cheerleading. It sends out roundabout the same message about womanhood.

    • Nancy

      I’ve seen some cheer squads that are incredibly focused on gymnastics and athleticism — and I have no problem with that aspect of it.  These young women are doing aerial somersaults and the like, and must do weight training and rigorous exercise to be able to do it.  They are very disciplined athletes (though the safety standards are not as high as in traditional gymnastics).  But the part about actually cheering at games (and especially the focus on physical attractiveness that goes along with that) does make me uneasy. 

      As far as what EE described here . . . my girls will NEVER be part of those kinds of dance classes.  It’s a pity that enough parents are okay with it that it’s now the majority of what’s offered at the studios in our city. Ugh. 

  • Briannaheldt

    YES.  Agree.  100%.  I just don’t understand what parents are thinking when their little girls are attempting to act seductive.  Ballet on the other hand is so incredibly beautiful, and decades from now your daughter will look back with pride on how hard she worked and on how well she did.

  • kiseklieia

    This has been an issue for a long time, although I don’t know if it was always as bad as now. When my sister was in dance lessons about fifteen years ago, especially when she was taking lessons with the city parks and rec department (which had a lot of teenagers teaching), there were definitely issues with the jazz routines being sexualized. She also went the classical ballet route, probably partly because of that but mostly, I think, because she liked its strict discipline and artistic challenge. Probably not coincidentally, she’s now a doctor. 

  • Joanie

    Beautiful! Well Said! Bravo!!!! And Jewel is so aptly named – a jewel among the rest of the, well, rocks. Viva Ballet!

  • http://grace-filled.net/ jen

    So glad that Jewel’s team prevailed against the others.

  • Mark S.

    Well said; 100% agree. Tell Jewel to stay the course. The discipline, practice, competition will serve her world in the world where such things actually DO matter.

  • http://www.gatebeautiful.ca bekka

    I absolutely agree with your point.

    While I’m all for broadening horizons and exploring different styles of dance, there are definitely some that are not at all a form of art.

    I wonder how many of those parents would react if, as you said, a pedophile snapped a few pictures and put them up on a child pornography site…

    • DogsNotCats

      Sadly that already happens, bekka. Sicko sex offenders are known to frequent gymnastic events, swimming competitions and–of course–dance performances so we all need to keep our eyes and ears open and for God’s sake, don’t dress our kids like streetwalkers.

  • Jenna Ledford

    Glad to hear that at least the judges are supporting technique and skill and not the gimmicks of sexual exploitation. My mouth dropped at “ …a troupe of 8 year old little girls slap their grinding behinds while winking at the audience over their shoulders.” I can’t believe this! Young girls already hear from the media that they are just sexual objects and to have parents so blatantly promote this. I am so horrified. 

  • Verity3

    I am terrified. So far my five-year-old’s ballet recitals have been perfectly sweet; the company doesn’t push the makeup or flirtation for the youngest dancers. But I see what the older dancers are doing, and cringe.

    Is it enough to keep my daughter on the ballet track, and avoid the “jazz” classes? Do you have any advice (for a mom who didn’t pursue dance as a child, and knows next-to-nothing) on finding the better, classical ballet-oriented companies able to deliver proper training? What questions should I be asking?

    • DogsNotCats

      Sadly, the jazz/hip-hop classes around here DO push makeup, tight clothes and flirtatious “come hither” looks.  The ballet classes have been fine, though. Good luck!

    • tchermommy

      I interviewed dance studios in our area until I found one that I liked. Our dance studio does NOT participate in competitions; there are no dance competition groups. They are there for the dance lessons and to perfect their technique. I came out and asked about recital wear, the amount of make up and they TYPE of dancing. I made it clear that I didn’t want my daughter dancing inappropriately for her age. Luckily I found a GREAT dance studio with the same beliefs.

  • DogsNotCats

    Yay! I’m glad I’m NOT the only “pretentious, elitist and boring” parent out there.  Our town only has a handful of dance studios and when their “students” perform at local parades and events, I’m always shocked to watch these poor girls sashay around in tight-fitting booty shorts while mouthing the words to songs by Lady GaGa and Katy Perry. (Um…have ANY of these parents of 6 year olds ever listened to the lyrics of Teenage Dream?!)

    And it’s not just the girls, folks.  My heart was broken last month on a field trip when a male kindergarten classmate of my son was bopping around singing loudly “Yeah…I’m sexy and I know it!”  as his own MOM looked adoringly on and sighed, “Aww…my son…he’s soooo cute!”   Ugh. 

    • kiseklieia

      I have a lot less problem with kids listening to music like that than with kids doing sexualized dance routines, actually. The thing with sexual lyrics is that the kids don’t know what they mean, and listening to those lyrics doesn’t involve kids in sexual behaviour. I loved the Dirty Dancing soundtrack as a kid, but still stayed committed to the idea of waiting for marriage to have sex until well into my 20s. Sexualized dance routines actually teach kids “sexy” behaviour and can appeal to pedophiles, which I think is a much more serious issue than kids listening to sexual lyrics that fly right over their heads. 

  • Miles O’Neal

    Bravo. Right on.

  • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

    Your comments about true art reminded me of my daughter’s disgust this past semester that her pre-AP english class was studying Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet (which she already knows backwards and forwards) with a more “modern” English rendering alongside the original — and that they were *reading* the modern rendering in class instead of the real play. (She was also appalled at the expressionless reading many of her classmates gave the text.)

    True art does indeed last forever.

  • http://heretichusband.blogspot.com/ Heretic Husband

    What.  The.  @#$@#.

    Why is this considered OK?  When these girls are 16, 17, 18, and start acting this way around boys their age, their parents are probably going to throw up their hands and say “I don’t know what happened!”

    Do people think this is “empowering”?  Teaching girls from an early age to use their sexuality as a weapon?

    I have a four year old daughter who has already started taking some dance lessons.   This is a very eye opening post, EE, thank you.

  • TheresaEh

    I am shocked!! Ballerina Jewel looks LOVELY,. I hope some of the attendee’s read you blog eh!

  • http://bunkersdown.com/ Ami

    I want my daughters to be proud of WHAT they do with their wonderful bodies rather than only concerned with HOW their bodies look.  And all this public sexualization of little girls does is tell them they are only worth something if their attire and attitude earns them wolf-whistles and cat-calls.  It is incredibly disheartening.

  • HollyJ

    Oooo.  This makes me so sad.  :(   I think I am really out of touch, too – mostly because I just have never had any kids involved in dance, I guess – I just haven’t seen it, so I like to pretend it doesn’t exist.  :(   So sad and so sorry that your daughter has to even face this – sad for the little girls whose parent’s push them to this or encourage it.   Jewel and her art are truly beautiful – expressing skill and diligence and discipline – not cheap and tawdry and tarnished.  Keep on keeping on, Jewel!

  • Lucie

    Jewel looks so lovely, classic and graceful – would have enjoyed seeing her dance! 

    As for “What’s next? Kindergartners swinging on strip poles?”  I frankly would not be surprised.  That’s where we’re headed, if we’re not already there – somewhere in America – already.

    Glad I’m still an old-fashioned, prudish, out of touch elitist.

  • Wendi

    I was so glad to see this post! my 4 year old is in ballet, but I’ve seen some of those pictures of the girls with the makeup and the too-adult poses. We are fortunate that the studio we go to is owned by Christians and we feel comfortable that there shouldn’t be anything inappropriate. However, should that become the case, we would definitely pull her out! I stand with you on this issue! Little girls do not need go grow up before their time! Regardless of what others may say!

    • Amy R

       Sadly, even Christians can be clueless, as I discovered in another local studio owned by a proudly Christian woman.  Sure, the ballet classes were delightful.  But everything else, not.  And ballet did not take precedence.

  • http://www.emuf.blogspot.com/ Emily a la Blog

    This is why I don’t find “Toddlers in Tiaras” entertaining. It’s horrifying. I’ve never felt more like a feminist than the time I watched an episode of that trainwreck.

  • Anonymous

    I was a cheerleader, briefly, in high school. The first time I attended a high school pep rally in a suburb (as a sub teacher) I was surprised to see cheerleaders that clapped and shouted and did gymnastics. That was it. My school’s cheerleaders were half step team and half booty-dancers. 

  • Anonymous

    PS  There is a fabulous Christian dance company in Mississippi. Ballet Magnificat. I think you would love it.

  • Jwhit221

    I agree with what you are saying in essence, but is it too out of place to say that the use of words like ”skank” and “skankerdoodle” (as quirky as that second one is) is not entirely woman-positive? I agree that young girls being taught to dance in a sexually suggestive manner is truly problematic (and don’t even get me started on some of what passes for “little girls’ clothing” in malls anymore…), but there are adult women who work in the sexual entertainment industry (whether by choice or circumstances or exploitation–that’s a different debate altogether!). Propagating an attitude that these women are “skanks” based simply on the type of work they do is dismissive and does nothing to help those who are actually being exploited. It also perpetuates the stereotype that women are only as “good” or “worthy” as they are “pure”–which is no better than the opposite stereotype that women are only valuable as sexual objects. Does that make sense? Sorry, I don’t mean to be judgemental either… :)

    • kiseklieia

      YES. I was concerned about this in the original post as well. Sexualization of young girls is inappropriate, but many adult women choose to work in the sex industry and do not feel degraded by it. Those women don’t deserve to be called “skanks” or treated as lesser people because of the choices they make. 

      • Anonymous

        I think you’re muddling the issue here. Just because a woman doesn’t FEEL degraded by working in the sex industry, the nature of her work is inherently degrading. Exchanging sex for money IS harmful to all persons involved, no matter WHICH word you use to describe it.

        • kiseklieia

          Why do we get to tell a woman who works in the sex industry, who probably has a lot more experience with it than we have, whether she’s being degraded? Why isn’t that up to her? And why do you consider sex work inherently degrading?

          • http://www.ingridschlueter.wordpress.com/ Ingrid

            With situational ethics like this, why call anything “degrading” or “sick”? Like the LSD addict in the news who ate the face off the guy several days ago. Maybe that was just his way of expressing himself. Maybe it was consensual. Why pass judgment? We’re not on a slippery slope, we’re at the bottom of the hill now, smashed up, unconscious and nearly dead as a society. And I fear for our children.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Hayes/845155642 Lisa Hayes

    Glad they won–it’s time people got back to sanity. I remember attending my daughter’s Cheerleading competition (NOTE: I do not like cheerleading. My daughter though started at age 14 and I can live with it) A “Pee Wee” cheer team (upper age was 8 or 9) danced VERY suggestively to “Ballroom Blitz” Give me AND THOSE GIRLS a break. WT? A “dance” set to music about a bar room fight?? Please. Some of the older men looked VERY disturbed. No one left–what would they say to the Granddaughter or Great Grandaughter “performing”……

    The whole “Toddlers & Tiaras” thing needs to end. They are CHILDREN not sex objects.

  • Ally

    Sigh… This is part of how I ended up quitting ballet before I really wanted to – the local school really didn’t put an emphasis on ballet, but the good school was too far away for the number of days a week (and for my obsession with keeping my grades as good as possible) I never really got forced to do anything I didn’t want, they just prioritized the other classes, and forced us to do crazy head shaking finale numbers that made my head hurt. We were told “she doesnt have to perform it on the recital, but she has to rehearse it” and that was the end of that school.

    It is horrible… And it’s also evident when watching the Miss America patent… In many cases it is quite clear that while the contestant may have taken dance for many years, they haven’t got the years of ballet technique – I really wonder if some of them have more than 2 years tops really from their form….and I was never that good myself, so I’m not holding them to ABA standards or anything – just normal, not even that good dance school recital standards… (but I know you probably have heard that a million times over if the pagent is ever watched in your house)

    • Ally

      And I just realized I ended up ranting on the damage such dance instruction does on technique, and didn’t even comment on the inappropriateness of the costumes, though that rather goes without saying…

  • Marcia

    Beautiful young lady! I know you must be proud! She should be too!  I agree with your comments 100%.  Our society is sexualizing young girls all over!!!  Like they have a “right” to do this.  While in Thailand, Bolivia, etc. the girls are placed in brothels, slave trafficking, etc…… at the early age of 5and up! They don’t even have dress them up sexy, etc…..men want young girls and boys! These girls/boys don’t want this, yet it happens! Their own families place them into this horrific life, some unknown to them, some on purpose (they need the money).  It’s ironic how girls here dress like this and it’s accepted or “ok” to do.  Have to go along with the flow, don’t we? NO, WE DON’T!!!  And people wonder why men molest girls, young or old! Society has added to their perversion! It’s ironic on your blog I noticed an ad for World Vision and a “cutie pootie” sexy ad for “Caroline G”. The poor girl in the World Vision ad will probably end up in a brothel, etc., if not sponsored. Sad.

  • Handsfull

    So was this a dance competition, or a ballet competition?  I’m hoping you’re not going to say it was a ballet competition… just can’t imagine ballet dancers dancing/dressing like that!
    I’ve heard lots of people talking about how our little girls shouldn’t be taught to dance/dress/act like you described in this post, using the reason that they shouldn’t be taught to grow up so soon.
    I’m a grown up.  I have a mortgage, a minivan and four kids.  Also, I’m not far from 40 (eeeeek!) so I’m definitely grown up.  And I have never, not once in my entire life, ‘slapped my grinding behind while winking at someone over my shoulder’ as you described these children doing.
    So what these children are being taught to do ISN’T being ‘grown up’.  They’re being taught to be seductive – and that’s wrong.
    Jewel, long may you dance beautifully!

    • Amy R

       Right!  My daughter’s ballet company does not do competitions, but I’ve been to one that a friend’s daughters were in.  They were in one of the few ballet groups…the majority were jazz & hip-hop.  It’s an industry: dance competitions, with their attendant vendors of dance gear, and photographers, etc.

  • http://www.adamshome.blogspot.com Erin Adams

    Well said.  You make some good, prudish sense.  What an elitist OC SAHM you are.  I jest, I jest…  ;)  
    If you didn’t say this in your fabulous hilarious manner, I would be crying at the awfulness of this scene.

  • Eleanor

    Wait, it’s the kids/parents fault that paedophiles might take photos?  Paedophilia hasn’t just suddenly sprung up since the advent of sexualised jazz dancing; and none of us can protect our children from paedophiles by making them ‘pure’. 

    I’m no fan of over sexualising little girls either, but not because of the ways other people might interpret their dance but rather because of the ways the girls themselves will – ‘this is how to be sexy and attract men’ is not a healthy message, whether or not it comes with the qualifier ‘when you’re old enough’. Telling kids that sexualised dancing is bad because of how people will interpret it merely reinforces what sexualised dancing itself tells them: their bodies are not their own, but are defined by how others interpret them and they have a duty to ensure that other people interpret them in a socially acceptable way. Ballet can be great, but it can also lead to eating disorders – there’s nothing intrinsically good or bad about the dance, only good and bad classes and teachers, much the same as jazz. Backup dancing for Madonna is also a short career that will not make you rich, requires a lot of hard work and is done by people who simply have a love of dance. 

    • kiseklieia

      That’s a good point, and one that I’m sorry I missed. There are serious issues with eating disorders in ballet–Elizabeth should check that her daughter’s teachers aren’t trying to get the girls to be thin. And girls shouldn’t be told that sexualized dancing is inappropriate because of how people will interpret it–rather, it’s inappropriate because dance moves that have the purpose of being sexually attractive are for adults, not kids. 

    • Anonymous

      The whole point of this article is to point out that sexualized dance moves are NOT for children. Sexy dance moves have their place–FOR ADULTS.

      • Eleanor

        I got that, and I’m arguing with the reasons you give for believing that sexy dance moves aren’t for children. 

  • http://twitter.com/SpecsBear Spectacled Bear

    I am in complete agreement with you that the over-sexualisation of children is a bad thing, it worries me that we can project “sexual tools” onto kids too young to know what they’re doing or how to treat sexual behaviours with respect and appropriate response. We want to create adults with good body image, a positive attitude to sex, respect for themselves and others and a healthy ability to understand their own, and their partners desires and needs. I don’t think early exposure to very sexual dancing is going to achieve that. 

    My problem is firstly, I’m not sure if ballet is always that much better. I love ballet, my sister is a professional dancer and, like you, I think it’s a beautiful thing to watch. But to claim nobility and purity without qualification is quite dangerous. Just as jazz/modern/hip-hop can be propped up by incredibly unhealthy images of sexuality that don’t help our kids develop positively, ballet is a world fraught with depression, anxiety, eating disorders and substance abuse thanks to pressure and horrendous expectations of perfection-in some, but by no means all quarters. Ballet has a dark side and manifold issues in its effect on children. I’m not suggesting for a minute this is something you or your daughter should worry about, but its good to bear in mind that it is not an art form somehow devoid of fear, pressure or negative mental impact. 

    Secondly, and the above aside, just like Jwhit221, I wonder if this isn’t a very woman positive article. Paedophiles are responsible for their perversity, not the parents of children dressed in a provocative way; otherwise we are guilty of victim blaming. I’m not a psychologist and I know very little about this, but I have been led to understand that the chances are a paedophile is just as interested in a kid playing in the garden dressed normally as a kid at a dance show. Just as a rapist is as interested, if not more so, in a woman sitting on her sofa in trackies as a woman in a club wearing little more than her underwear. I wonder if we would be better framing the argument in terms of presenting sex in very narrow and negative way to young people rather than asserting that it is overtly sexual and therefore must be dirty in comparison to ballet, which is pure and noble. 

    • Anonymous

      I understand the risks associated with ballet. I understand the dark side. There is a dark side to every art form–even my professional career as a writer makes me ill sometimes!–but there are good risks and there are bad risks. Taking the risks inherent to ballet is a risk I prefer over the risks of a little girl stripping herself half naked while grinding her ass to a Katy Perry song.

  • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

    When I commented originally, my thoughts turned toward the manner in which art — in any context — tends to be less appreciated than cruder forms of entertainment. And that’s certainly true, but it’s hardly a new problem. We can see it, for instance, when Shakespeare (through Hamlet’s speech to the players) admonishes actors of his time for their tendency to go for the cheap laugh from the groundlings.

    But I’ve been reading the comments and I suppose I will offer a few thoughts on the issue everyone else focused on — the problem of the sexualization of children. It is a problem, but like the above, it’s not a new problem. The form and expression may change over time, but it was a problem 35 years ago, 75 years ago, 500 years ago, 2000 years ago, and as far as I can tell for as long as their have been human cultures and children. It’s often not even seen as a “problem” at all.

    It’s similar to other almost intractable problems like the treatment of women as property. There’s a video making the rounds deconstructing the modern statements about “biblical marriage” (which I agree is often more a cultural statement than anything else) which mentions at one point the biblical provision “forcing” a woman to marry her rapist. On that, it’s really off the mark. In the ancient context, rape was many things, but among them a weapon or tool of war. (Heck, it’s still such a tool today.) And it was not really something for which men ever suffered. If a woman was unprotected, she was pretty much fair game. (The same was also largely true of children.) And once raped, a woman often had few options for survival — prostitution was a common recourse. The “law” in question, like a number of the laws in question, afforded some provision and dignity for the woman and imposed an obligation on the man. By our standards, it’s oppressive, but in its context, it was better than the prevailing alternatives.

    We see that played out again and again in the stories. Tamar and Judah (and his sons) comes to mind. She masqueraded as a prostitute (and she was not far from being forced into that life in reality) in order to gain what was her right. Ruth was overtly and, in her context, shockingly sexually bold in order to secure a place for herself and her mother-in-law in a situation in which they had none at all. (I suppose some people might think it was actually Boaz’ “feet” which Ruth uncovered and lay upon. Sigh.)

    With that said, language like “skank” is the language of shame and even if it is not directed at or intended for the children who have been or are being sexualized, it will tend to be heard and internalized by them. I grasp that it’s intended to shame the parents and other adults, but it probably won’t. And like the scattershot of a shotgun blast, it’s hard to control what’s hit.

    There are many ways child sexualization can play out over the course of their lives. It’s easy for a person to internalize the idea that all they truly have to offer to another is sexual pleasure and if they fail at that they are worthless. Sex can also come to be perceived as a way to wield power over those who have wielded it against you. And power — even perceived power — can be intoxicating. That’s not to say that any of these are conscious or deliberate thoughts or understandings. It’s just a couple of many ways such things can work themselves out.

    No real suggestions, which is why I didn’t originally comment on this aspect. The fact that child sexualization is a deep and seemingly intractable problem does not mean there’s no use fighting it. We should do all we can to end it. But we also need to recognize how difficult an issue it truly is. The outward expression may shift, but the underlying reality does not.

    • Anonymous

      I love your thoughts, as usual, Scott. :) I’m curious, though, do you think there’s ever an occasion for using “language of shame”? I think when behavior is shameful, there ARE times when it’s fine to use a harsher word in order to draw attention to the egregious nature of the behavior. Sometimes it seems like we sugarcoat and use euphemisms even when talking about terrible things. There are times when using a sharp word goes straight to the point and really hits the mark. That’s why I chose the word skank–or skankerdoodle! :) What are your thoughts on this?

      • http://faithandfood.morizot.net/ Scott Morizot

         I’m hard-pressed to think of a situation in which efforts to employ shame as a behavior control mechanism is not toxic. It also tends to be internalized by the wrong people and generally ineffective on its intended targets.

        I’m also trying to think of any instance in which shaming techniques are employed in the NT and I can’t think of any. Even with the guy in Corinth who was sleeping with his father’s wife, Paul’s instructions were basically to bar him from the table (communion) and stop supporting his behavior in the hope that he would repent. Jesus’ harshest words were for the scribes and the pharisees, but even there he didn’t shame. (Heck, at the time ‘hypocrite’ wasn’t even seen as an insult, per se.) And he told people to do as they said, that they taught rightly, just don’t do as they do. He certainly didn’t shame the tax collectors, prostitutes, etc.

        And in this specific instance, I assume your intent is to shame the parents and other adults involved. Discussions about whether or not that could be effective aside in any circumstance aside, it’s the children you actually called ‘skankerdoodle’. As I mentioned, it’s hard to “aim” shame precisely. I think I can safely assume you would never intend to shame sexualized children (or the adults into whom they do eventually grow) for what is essentially done to them, but that’s essentially what you did.

  • Char

    Stick with tap dance and ballet, people! Stay away from “jazz” dance classes and anything else that isn’t a classic, tried and true form of dance.

    I have seen first-hand what they are teaching in competitive-crazy dance studios and it is bad news. The problem, of course, is that “all my friends are in JAZZ class!!!” Quite frankly, I’m not saying that the girls in jazz class don’t physically work hard, but really, there is little actual classical talent in those types of dancing. Slithering all over the floor and all that – boring.

    • Amy R

       Funny, but even tap has its dark side.  At the studio near me, my daughter, with several years of tap already, thought she might take a class there, as it was super convenient.  Sure.  Try a class with these ladies.  OK…she could not get out of there fast enough after seeing their sexy moves!  It FEELS completely wrong to her.  She about wept, cuz it was like they were wrecking something joyful.

  • http://www.ingridschlueter.wordpress.com/ Ingrid

    Three cheers! You nailed it absolutely. As a mothe of 2 daughters,, I am fed up with the basest, most vile conduct now being considered normative. The same is true in music. Our son is 15 and a prodigy on pipe organ and piano. Classical and sacred music. People look at him in pity. Real “musicians” are covered in tattoos from head to toe and sing about disemboweling cops. What is a piano? What’s an organ? REAL music makers dress in raw meat, right? It isn’t fun being a parent at the end of the West. It’s downright sad,  actually. Thanks again.